| Literature DB >> 31450639 |
Adriana Iriarte1,2,3, Agnes Figueras4,5, Pau Cerdà1,2,3, José María Mora1,2,3, Anna Jucglà1,3,6, Rosa Penín3,7, Francesc Viñals8,9,10, Antoni Riera-Mestre11,12,13,14.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia (HHT) type 2 patients have increased activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway in telangiectasia. The main objective is to evaluate the activation of the PI3K pathway in cutaneous telangiectasia of HHT1 patients. A cutaneous biopsy of a digital hand telangiectasia was performed in seven HHT1 and eight HHT2 patients and compared with six controls. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of our center. A histopathological pattern with more dilated and superficial vessels that pushed up the epidermis was identified in HHT patients regardless of the type of mutation and was associated with older age, as opposed to the common telangiectasia pattern. The mean proliferation index (Ki-67) was statistically higher in endothelial cells (EC) from HHT1 than in controls. The percentage of positive EC for pNDRG1, pAKT, and pS6 in HHT1 patients versus controls resulted in higher values, statistically significant for pNDRG1 and pS6. In conclusion, we detected an increase in EC proliferation linked to overactivation of the PI3K pathway in cutaneous telangiectasia biopsies from HHT1 patients. Our results suggest that PI3K inhibitors could be used as novel therapeutic agents for HHT.Entities:
Keywords: Smad pathway; hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia; mTOR inhibitors; phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; rare diseases; telangiectasia; transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450639 PMCID: PMC6770684 DOI: 10.3390/cells8090971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1 and 2 patient characteristics.
| No. | Age, Years | M/F | TTE | Thoracic CT | Abdominal CT | GI Telangiectasia | CI, L/min/m2 | ESS | Mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | F | 2 | Pulmonary AVM RUL, LUL, LLL (embolized) | Pancreatic telangiectasias | Esophagus–duodenum | 3.06 | 4.75 | |
| 2 * | 52 | F | 1 | Pulmonary AVM LLL (embolized) | No pathological findings | Gastroduodenal, proximal–middle jejunum | 2.47 | 3.04 | |
| 3 | 59 | F | 2 | Pulmonary AVM LUL, RLL, RUL (embolized) | Ileal-jejunum AVM | Stomach–proximal–middle jejunum | 2.32 | 7.68 | |
| 4 | 38 | M | 3 | Pulmonary AVM LLL, RUL (embolized) | Intrahepatic telangiectasias Hepatic AP shunt | Not performed | 3.4 | 3.84 | |
| 5 * | 43 | M | 3 | Pulmonary AVM LUL, RUL (embolized) | No pathological findings | Not performed | 2.44 | 4.42 | |
| 6 | 42 | M | 1 | No pathological findings | Intrahepatic telangiectasias | Stomach–ascending colon | 2.77 | 3.33 | |
| 7 * | 56 | F | 2 | No pathological findings | No pathological findings | Gastroduodenal–Ileocecal valve | 3.36 | 5.47 | |
| 8 + | 62 | F | 1 | No pathological findings | Intrahepatic telangiectasias Hepatic AV shunt Hepatic artery enlargement FNH Intrapancreatic AVM Ileal AVM Cecal AVM Uterine AVM | Not performed | 3.74 | 2.83 | |
| 9 | 49 | M | 1 | No pathological findings | No pathological findings | Not performed | 2.28 | 6.38 | |
| 10 ** | 41 | F | 3 | Pulmonary AVM LLL | Intrahepatic telangiectasias Hepatic AV shunt Hepatic artery enlargement NRH Uterine AVM | Not performed | 3.12 | 2.93 | |
| 11 **,+ | 70 | F | 0 | No pathological findings | Hepatomegaly Hepatic AV shunt Hepatic artery enlargement Intrapancreatic AVM Left renal artery aneurysm | Not performed | 3.7 | 6.59 | |
| 12 | 49 | M | 0 | Not performed | Intrahepatic telangiectasias Intrapancreatic AVM Gastro-omental artery aneurysms | Not performed | 4.57 | 13.5 | |
| 13 + | 51 | M | 1 | No pathological findings | Hepatomegaly Hepatic AP shunt Hepatic artery enlargement | Not performed | 3.3 | 6.05 | |
| 14 | 51 | F | 1 | No pathological findings | Hepatic telangiectasias Hepatic AP shunt Hepatic AV shunt | Not performed | 3.2 | 1.41 | |
| 15 | 60 | M | 0 | No pathological findings | Hepatic telangiectasias Hepatic AP shunt Hepatic AV shunt Intrapancreatic AVM | Gastroduodenal | 2.9 | 6.09 |
Contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Computed tomography (CT). Arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Cardiac index (CI). Epistaxis severity score (ESS). Female (F). Right upper lobe (RUL), left upper lobe (LUL), left lower lobe (LLL), right lower lobe (RLL). AP indicates arterioportal (hepatic artery to portal vein); AV, arteriovenous (hepatic artery to hepatic vein); Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH); Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH); * Patients 2, 5, and 7 are relatives. ** Patient 11 is the mother of patient 10. + HHT2 patients already enrolled in our previous study with available sample to repeat PI3K immunohistochemistry studies [12].
Figure 1Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) microscope images. Scale bars, 100 µm. (A) Examples of conventional telangiectasia characterized by the presence of dilated microvessels at the superficial dermis (black arrows). Normal vessels are indicated with red arrows. One HHT1 patient and one HHT2. (B) Examples of more dilatated vessels expanding the papillary dermis between rete ridges that crowd up the epidermis layer (black arrows) (angiokeratoma-like pattern). One HHT1 patient and one HHT2.
Clinical characteristics of HHT patients according to different histological patterns.
| Conventional Pattern | Angiokeratoma-Like Pattern | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 7 (46.6) | 8 (53.3) | NA |
| Female gender | 3 (42.8) | 5 (62.5) | 0.619 |
| Age, years | 47.2 (9.5) | 57.2 (7.0) | 0.042 * |
| Mutation | |||
|
| 5 (87.5) | 2 (25) | 0.132 |
|
| 2 (28.5) | 6 (75) | |
| ESS | 3.9 (0.6) | 5.4 (1.5) | 0.049 * |
Standard deviation (SD); endoglin (ENG); activin (ACVRL1); epistaxis severity score (ESS); * p < 0.05.
Figure 2Increased vessels size and collagen IV staining in HHT1 and HHT2 cutaneous telangiectasia biopsies. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE), CD34, and collagen IV staining of one control, two HHT1 patients and one HHT2 patient biopsies. Scale bars, 100 µm. (B) Quantification of the vessel area in controls (n = 6), HHT1 (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 5). Results are represented as % relative to the control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Statistical significance of two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests: ** p < 0.01. (C) Quantification of the collagen IV width in controls (n = 6), HHT1 (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 5). Results are represented as % relative to the control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Statistical significance of two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Increased endothelial cell proliferation in HHT1 cutaneous telangiectasia biopsies. (A) Ki-67 (brown nuclei, arrows) staining of endothelial cells in one control and two HHT1 patients. Scale bars, 100 µm. (B) Quantification of the percentage of Ki-67-positive endothelial cells in controls (n = 6), HHT1 patients (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 5). Error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean. Statistical significance of two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Increased activation of PI3K signaling in HHT1 cutaneous telangiectasia biopsies. (A) pAKT, pNDRG1, and pS6 staining of a control and two HHT1 patient biopsies. Scale bars, 100 µm. (B) Quantification of the percentage of pAKT-positive endothelial cells in controls (n = 6), HHT1 patients (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 4). Results are represented as % relative to the control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (C) Quantification of the percentage of pNDRG1-positive endothelial cells in controls (n = 6), HHT1 patients (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 5). Results are represented as % relative to the control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Statistical significance of two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests: ** p < 0.01. (D) Quantification of the percentage of pS6-positive endothelial cells in controls (n = 6), HHT1 patients (n = 7), and HHT2 patients (n = 5). Results are represented as % relative to the control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Statistical significance of two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.