| Literature DB >> 31450597 |
Rongshan Wei1, Weiwen Lin2, Xiaoxia Xiao2, Qunchao Chen2, Fanyang Li2.
Abstract
This study aims to propose a capacitance-to-digital converter (CDC) based on a third-order cascade of integrators with a feed-forward (CIFF) incremental sigma-delta modulator for smart humidity sensor application. Disguised zoom-in technology was proposed to enlarge the measurable range of the CDC. The input range of the CDC was 0-388 pF. The proposed CDC was realized using 0.18 μm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor technology. Results show that the CDC performs a 13-bit capacitance-to-digital conversion in 0.8 ms. The analog system consumes 169.7 μA from a 1.8 V supply, which corresponds to a figure of merit (FOM) of 3.0 nJ/step. The proposed CDC was combined with a HS1101 humidity sensor to demonstrate its incorporation in an overall system design. The resolution was 0.7% relative humidity (RH) over a range of 30%-90% RH.Entities:
Keywords: cascade of integrators with a feed-forward (CIFF); humidity sensor; sigma-delta modulator
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450597 PMCID: PMC6780520 DOI: 10.3390/mi10090561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Charge balanced operation of the capacitance-to-digital converter (CDC).
Figure 2Overview of the analog-to-digital converter (ADC).
Figure 3Scalable Cx circuit.
Figure 4Zoom-in circuit.
Figure 5Third-order cascade of integrators with a feed-forward (CIFF) modulator structure and the main signal flow.
Figure 6First-stage integrator op amp.
Figure 7Second- and third-stage integrator op amps.
Figure 8The circuit of the comparator.
Figure 9Micrograph of the CDC chip.
Figure 10Output spectrum of the bitstream.
Figure 11Measured Dout.
Figure 12Error of measured capacitance at 25 °C.
Figure 13Measured relative humidity error at 25 °C.
Performance comparison with previously reported capacitance-to-digital converters (CDCs).
| Ref. | Supply Voltage (V) | Power (μW) | Measurement Time (ms) | ENOB (bit) | Input Range (pF) | Accuracy (pF) | FOM (nJ/step) | Area (mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 1.2 | 6.4 | 0.016 | 11.6 | 0–12.66 | - | 0.000033 | 0.2 |
| [ | 3.3 | 760 | 10.5 | 16.7 | 6–22 | 0.2% | 0.074 | - |
| [ | 1.5 | 52.5 | 3.2 | 13 | 0.27–0.9 | - | 0.021 | 0.148 |
| This work | 1.8 | 305.46 | 0.8 | 13 | 0–388 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.57 |
ENOB—effective number of bits; FOM—figure of merit.
Performance comparison with previously reported humidity sensors.
| Ref. | Supply Voltage (V) | Power (μW) | Measurement Time (ms) | Relative Humidity Range | Resolution (%RH) | Error (%RH) | Area (mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | - | 150 | 1000 | 20%–80% | 0.02 | - | - |
| [ | 3 | 3.2 | 1000 | 0%–100% | 0.7 | ±2.0 | - |
| [ | 1.8 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 20%–90% | 0.1 | - | 0.25 |
| This work | 1.8 | 305.46 | 0.8 | 30%–90% | 0.7 | +3.2/−2.7 | 0.57 |