Deokhoon Jun1,2, Shaun O'Leary1,3, Steven M McPhail4,5, Venerina Johnston1,6. 1. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungsung University, Busan, South Korea. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia. 5. School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 6. RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Work-related psychosocial factors such as job strain are thought to contribute to elevated psychological stress in office workers. One factor that may impact the relationship between job strain and psychological distress is the individual's coping resources. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction effect of coping resources on the relationship between job strain and psychological distress in office workers. METHODS: 220 office workers in Australia and Korea completed the Job Content Questionnaire (to evaluate job strain and social support at work), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale, (DASS-21, a measure of psychological distress), and the Coping with Job Stress Scale to assess control and escape coping. Hierarchical regression analyses were executed to examine the interaction and moderating effect of coping resources. RESULTS: Job strain had a direct positive relationship with all three domains of psychological distress. The relationship between job strain and depression was positively moderated by escape coping, but negatively moderated by social support. Use of higher levels of escape coping predicted higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms when higher levels of job strain were perceived. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest there may be a direct relationship between job strain and psychological distress in office workers. This relationship, however, may be moderated by the office workers coping resources (coping strategies and social support). It is suggested that the evaluation of coping might be a key consideration in the elements of the assessment of psychological distress in office workers.
BACKGROUND: Work-related psychosocial factors such as job strain are thought to contribute to elevated psychological stress in office workers. One factor that may impact the relationship between job strain and psychological distress is the individual's coping resources. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction effect of coping resources on the relationship between job strain and psychological distress in office workers. METHODS: 220 office workers in Australia and Korea completed the Job Content Questionnaire (to evaluate job strain and social support at work), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale, (DASS-21, a measure of psychological distress), and the Coping with Job Stress Scale to assess control and escape coping. Hierarchical regression analyses were executed to examine the interaction and moderating effect of coping resources. RESULTS: Job strain had a direct positive relationship with all three domains of psychological distress. The relationship between job strain and depression was positively moderated by escape coping, but negatively moderated by social support. Use of higher levels of escape coping predicted higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms when higher levels of job strain were perceived. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest there may be a direct relationship between job strain and psychological distress in office workers. This relationship, however, may be moderated by the office workers coping resources (coping strategies and social support). It is suggested that the evaluation of coping might be a key consideration in the elements of the assessment of psychological distress in office workers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Interaction effect; coping strategy; social support; work zzm321990stress
Authors: Rémi Colin-Chevalier; Bruno Pereira; Amanda Clare Benson; Samuel Dewavrin; Thomas Cornet; Frédéric Dutheil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tiago Santos; António de Sousa Uva; José Fernandes Rodrigues; Regina Ferreira; Diogo Monteiro; Antonio Hernández-Mendo; Filipe Rodrigues Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Edwin Ck Tan; Kuan-Yu Pan; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Johan Fastbom; Hugo Westerlund; Hui-Xin Wang Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Chang Liu; Melinda McCabe; Andrew Dawson; Chad Cyrzon; Shruthi Shankar; Nardin Gerges; Sebastian Kellett-Renzella; Yann Chye; Kim Cornish Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.390