Literature DB >> 31449831

Focal High-intensity Focussed Ultrasound Partial Gland Ablation for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Report of Medium-term Outcomes From a Single-center in the United Kingdom.

Maximilian J Johnston1, Amr Emara2, Mohamed Noureldin2, Simon Bott3, Richard G Hindley2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our intermediate outcomes of the use of focal ablation for treating significant unilateral prostate cancer. This technique was adopted in our center 10 years ago. With improving diagnostic accuracy of index prostate cancer lesions and a low side-effect profile, use of focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is increasing.
METHODS: Patients were diagnosed using prostate specific antigen (PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and template transperineal biopsies. Focal ablation of significant cancer was performed with the Sonablate device. Follow-up consisted of magnetic resonance imaging scanning, PSA, validated questionnaires, biopsy for cause, and redo HIFU if required as part of the treatment strategy.
RESULTS: A total of 107 men underwent focal HIFU. In total, 88% had intermediate/high risk disease, and the mean pre-HIFU PSA was 7.7. A total of 31% had high volume Gleason 6 disease, 55% had Gleason 3+4 disease, and 13% had Gleason ≥ 4+3 disease. In total, 54 men received a hemiablation, 10 a focal ablation, and 43 a quadrant ablation. Median follow-up was 30 months, subjects' PSA dropped to an average 71% nadir. A total of 8% had biochemical recurrence and 11% required adjuvant treatment. Freedom from additional procedures for clinically significant recurrent disease, including redo-HIFU, was 85.5%. Postoperative complications included 1% new use of pads, 1.9% urethral stricture, 2.8% post-HIFU TURP, and new onset ED of 14%.
CONCLUSION: In a carefully chosen cohort of patients for focal HIFU our results suggest acceptable oncological control with minimal postoperative morbidity. Further studies are required to establish this technique as a less morbid alternative to radical therapy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31449831     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa; Bradford J Wood; Andre Luis Abreu; Bruno Nahar; Toshitaka Shin; Selcuk Guven; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Development and future prospective of treatment for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Norihiro Koizumi; Soichiro Yuzuriha; Tatsuo Kano; Takahiro Ogawa; Mayura Nakano; Masayoshi Kawakami; Masahiro Nitta; Masanori Hasegawa; Akira Miyajima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 4.  Focal prostate cancer therapy in the era of multiparametric MRI: a review of options and outcomes.

Authors:  John R Heard; Aurash Naser-Tavakolian; Michael Nazmifar; Michael Ahdoot
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 5.  Current status and future prospective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: development of multiparametric MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided biopsy, and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Sunao Shoji; Shinichiro Hiraiwa; Izumi Hanada; Hakushi Kim; Masahiro Nitta; Masanori Hasegawa; Yoshiaki Kawamura; Kazunobu Hashida; Takuma Tajiri; Akira Miyajima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Erectile function after focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fallara; Paolo Capogrosso; Paolo Maggio; Alessandro Taborelli; Francesco Montorsi; Federico Dehò; Andrea Salonia
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  The primary treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue He; Ping Tan; Mingjing He; Liang Hu; Jianzhong Ai; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Available evidence on HIFU for focal treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arnas Bakavicius; Giancarlo Marra; Petr Macek; Cary Robertson; Andre L Abreu; Arvin K George; Bernard Malavaud; Patrick Coloby; Pascal Rischmann; Marco Moschini; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Abhinav Sidana; Armando Stabile; Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa; Jean de la Rosette; Hashim Ahmed; Thomas Polascik; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Standardized Nomenclature and Surveillance Methodologies After Focal Therapy and Partial Gland Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus.

Authors:  Amir H Lebastchi; Arvin K George; Thomas J Polascik; Jonathan Coleman; Jean de la Rosette; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Michael A Gorin; Abhinav Sidana; Sangeet Ghai; Kae Jack Tay; John F Ward; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Berrend G Muller; Bernard Malavaud; Pierre Mozer; Sebastien Crouzet; Peter L Choyke; Osamu Ukimura; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 20.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.