Literature DB >> 31449187

A Virtual Crossmatch-based Strategy Facilitates Sharing of Deceased Donor Kidneys for Highly Sensitized Recipients.

Garrett R Roll1, Allison B Webber2, David H Gae3, Zoltan Laszik4, Mehdi Tavakol1, Luis Mayen5, Kelly Cunniffe3, Shareef Syed1, Ryutaro Hirose1, Chris Freise1, Sandy Feng1, John P Roberts1, Nancy L Ascher1, Peter G Stock1, Raja Rajalingam3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 19.2% of kidneys exported for candidates with >98% calculated panel reactive antibodies are transplanted into unintended recipients, most commonly due to positive physical crossmatch (PXM). We describe the application of a virtual crossmatch (VXM) that has resulted in a very low rate of transplantation into unintended recipients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of kidneys imported to our center to assess the reasons driving late reallocation based on the type of pretransplant crossmatch used for the intended recipient.
RESULTS: From December 2014 to October 2017, 254 kidneys were imported based on our assessment of a VXM. Of these, 215 (84.6%) were transplanted without a pretransplant PXM. The remaining 39 (15.4%) recipients required a PXM on admission using a new sample because they did not have an HLA antibody test within the preceding 3 months or because they had a recent blood transfusion. A total of 93% of the imported kidneys were transplanted into intended recipients. There were 18 late reallocations: 9 (3.5%) due to identification of a new recipient medical problem upon admission, 5 (2%) due to suboptimal organ quality on arrival, and only 4 (1.6%) due to a positive PXM or HLA antibody concern. A total of 42% of the recipients of imported kidneys had a 100% calculated panel reactive antibodies. There were no hyperacute rejections and very infrequent acute rejection in the first year suggesting no evidence for immunologic memory response.
CONCLUSIONS: Seamless sharing is within reach, even when kidneys are shipped long distances for highly sensitized recipients. Late reallocations can be almost entirely avoided with a strategy that relies heavily on VXM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31449187     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  S Peacock; D Briggs; M Barnardo; R Battle; P Brookes; C Callaghan; B Clark; C Collins; S Day; N Diaz Burlinson; P Dunn; R Fernando; S Fuggle; A Harmer; D Kallon; D Keegan; T Key; E Lawson; S Lloyd; J Martin; J McCaughan; D Middleton; F Partheniou; A Poles; T Rees; D Sage; E Santos-Nunez; O Shaw; M Willicombe; J Worthington
Journal:  Int J Immunogenet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.385

Review 2.  Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Madhu C Bhaskaran; Sebastiaan Heidt; Thangamani Muthukumar
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Trends and impact on cold ischemia time and clinical outcomes using virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Dana Jorgensen; Jonathan G Yabes; Kwonho Jeong; Adriana Zeevi; John Lunz; Amit D Tevar; Michele Molinari; Sumit Mohan; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 18.998

4.  Technical and clinical aspects of the histocompatibility crossmatch assay in solid organ transplantation

Authors:  Ana María Arrunátegui; Daniel S Ramón; Luz Marina Viola; Linda G Olsen; Andrés Jaramillo
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.173

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.