Literature DB >> 31449138

Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results of an International Survey of Current Practice.

Bradley N Reames1, Alex B Blair2, Robert W Krell3, Vincent P Groot4, Georgios Gemenetzis5, James C Padussis1, Sarah P Thayer1, Massimo Falconi6, Christopher L Wolfgang2, Matthew J Weiss7, Chandrakanth Are1, Jin He2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeon preferences for the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
BACKGROUND: Select patients with LAPC may become candidates for curative resection following neoadjuvant therapy, and recent reports of survival are encouraging. Yet the optimal management approach remains unclear.
METHODS: An extensive electronic survey was systematically distributed by email to an international cohort of pancreas surgeons. Data collected included practice characteristics, management preferences, attitudes regarding contraindications to surgery, and 6 clinical vignettes of patients that ultimately received a margin negative resection (with detailed videos of post-neoadjuvant imaging) to assess propensity for surgical exploration if resection status is not known.
RESULTS: A total of 153 eligible responses were received from 4 continents. Median duration of practice is 12 years (interquartile range 6-20) and 77% work in a university setting. Most surgeons (86%) are considered high volume (>10 resections/yr), 33% offer a minimally-invasive approach, and 50% offer arterial resections in select patients. Most (72%) always recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 65% prefer FOLFIRINOX. Preferences for the duration of chemotherapy varied widely: 39% prefer ≥2 months, 43% prefer ≥4 months, and 11% prefer ≥6 months. Forty-one percent frequently recommend neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and 53% prefer 5 to 6 weeks of chemoradiation. The proportion of surgeons favoring exploration following neoadjuvant varied extensively across 5 vignettes of LAPC, from 14% to 53%. In a vignette of oligometastatic liver metastases, 31% would offer exploration if a favorable therapy response is observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In an international cohort of pancreas surgeons, there is substantial variation in management preferences, perceived contraindications to surgery, and the propensity to consider exploration in LAPC. These results emphasize the importance of a robust and nuanced multidisciplinary discussion for each patient, and suggest an evolving concept of "resectability."
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31449138     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  8 in total

1.  Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Samer Tohme; Richard Hoehn; Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Amer H Zureikat; Paniccia Alessandro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Anatomic Criteria Determine Resectability in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Minako Nagai; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He; Vincent P Groot; Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Amol Narang; Daniel Laheru; Kelly Lafaro; Joseph M Herman; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  CA19.9 Response and Tumor Size Predict Recurrence Following Post-neoadjuvant Pancreatectomy in Initially Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Roberto Salvia; Giulio Belfiori; Sara Nobile; Giulia Gasparini; Gabriella Lionetto; Claudio Luchini; Paola Mattiolo; Marco Schiavo-Lena; Claudio Doglioni; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Pancreatic cancer survival by stage and age in seven high-income countries (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study.

Authors:  Citadel J Cabasag; Melina Arnold; Mark Rutherford; Aude Bardot; Jacques Ferlay; Eileen Morgan; Alana Little; Prithwish De; Elijah Dixon; Ryan R Woods; Nathalie Saint-Jacques; Sue Evans; Gerda Engholm; Mark Elwood; Neil Merrett; David Ransom; Dianne L O'Connell; Freddie Bray; Isabelle Soerjomataram
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Carbon-Ion Beam Irradiation and the miR-200c Mimic Effectively Eradicate Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells Under in vitro and in vivo Conditions.

Authors:  Sei Sai; Eun Ho Kim; Woong Sub Koom; Guillaume Vares; Masao Suzuki; Shigeru Yamada; Mitsuhiro Hayashi
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Paradigm shift for defining the resectability of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mee Joo Kang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-11-30

7.  Geographic variation in attitudes regarding management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Logan R McNeil; Alex B Blair; Robert W Krell; Chunmeng Zhang; Aslam Ejaz; Vincent P Groot; Georgios Gemenetzis; James C Padussis; Massimo Falconi; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Chandrakanth Are; Jin He; Bradley N Reames
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-06

8.  Do we need sequential local therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Christoph W Michalski
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-12-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.