Literature DB >> 31448993

Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: an experience sampling approach.

Minou Weijs-Perrée1, Lorell Buck1, Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek1, Theo Arentze1.   

Abstract

Although it is recognised that face-to-face interactions are important for sharing interests and (new) knowledge, it remains unknown how and where students and university employees interact in academic buildings. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyse the location choice for face-to-face interactions in an academic building, including several personal- and interaction characteristics. An Experience Sampling Method (ESM) was used to collect data on 643 face-to-face interactions during two weeks in the Flux building at Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. In general, students more often interacted in meeting rooms than teaching staff, and support staff interacted less in eat/drink areas and the hallways than other users. Unexpectedly, some of the lectures took place outside of traditional project-/lecture space. Real estate managers of university campuses could use these results to create better interactive work environments that stimulate face-to-face interactions among employees and students of different departments. Practitioner Summary: Based on longitudinal data of ftf interactions among students and employees in an academic building, results showed that ftf interaction characteristics, compared to personal characteristics, are most important for explaining the location choice of interactions. These insights could help to design academic work environments that optimise the support of interactions. Abbreviation: ABO: activity-based office; ANOVA: analyses of variance; ESM: experience sampling method; FTF: face-to-face; HR: human resources; MMNL: mixed multinomial logit model; NewWoW: new ways of working.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic building; Experience Sampling Method (ESM); face-to-face interaction (ftf); location choice; physical work environment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31448993     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1660419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  1 in total

1.  Sensor-based proximity metrics for team research. A validation study across three organizational contexts.

Authors:  Jörg Müller; Julio Meneses; Anne Laure Humbert; Elisabeth Anna Guenther
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.