Lissandra Cavalli1, Mohamed F Jeebhay2, Flavielle Marques3, Rebecca Mitchell4, Barbara Neis5, Dorothy Ngajilo2, Andrew Watterson6. 1. Health and Biosafety/Technological Innovation in Aquaculture, Department of Agricultural Diagnosis and Research - DDPA, Secretariat of Agriculture of the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Seapdr, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 2. Occupational Medicine Division/Centre for Environmental & Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Department of Agricultural Diagnosis and Research - DDPA, Secretariat of Agriculture of the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Seapdr, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 4. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. 5. SafetyNet Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Research and Department of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. 6. Occupational and Environmental Health Research Group, Public Health & Population Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Pathfoot Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
Abstract
Objectives: In 2017 the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Committee on Fisheries committed to prioritize occupational safety and health issues in aquaculture (AOSH). An international team was established to synthesize OSH knowledge concerning more than 19 million, often vulnerable, aquaculture workers found globally. Methods: The study was conducted as a desktop scoping exercise using both peer-reviewed and gray literature and the knowledge and expertize of an international panel. Collated information used a standard proforma. Panel members developed draft national and regional AOSH profiles outlining occupational hazards contributing to occupational injuries, diseases, and known solutions. These were work-shopped and refined after gathering additional information and used to compile the first global scoping review report on AOSH. Results: Synthesized results revealed multiple hazards, significant global knowledge gaps and some successful and unsuccessful global, national and industry-specific AOSH policies, practices and standards along the primary supply chain, in marine and freshwater contexts. Some constructive initiatives by the International Labor Organization (ILO) and FAO, industry, labor and civil society groups in a range of employment and geographical settings and across diverse populations of workers were identified. Conclusion: Global commitment to AOSH should be given the same focus as product quality, biosecurity, food safety and environmental sustainability in the sector. This needs development and implementation of integrated AOSH actions appropriate for diverse settings especially in low and middle-income countries encompassing greater uptake of international codes, better risk assessment and OSH management, adoption of technological innovations, effective OSH regulation and enforcement, adequate resources, training and information.
Objectives: In 2017 the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Committee on Fisheries committed to prioritize occupational safety and health issues in aquaculture (AOSH). An international team was established to synthesize OSH knowledge concerning more than 19 million, often vulnerable, aquaculture workers found globally. Methods: The study was conducted as a desktop scoping exercise using both peer-reviewed and gray literature and the knowledge and expertize of an international panel. Collated information used a standard proforma. Panel members developed draft national and regional AOSH profiles outlining occupational hazards contributing to occupational injuries, diseases, and known solutions. These were work-shopped and refined after gathering additional information and used to compile the first global scoping review report on AOSH. Results: Synthesized results revealed multiple hazards, significant global knowledge gaps and some successful and unsuccessful global, national and industry-specific AOSH policies, practices and standards along the primary supply chain, in marine and freshwater contexts. Some constructive initiatives by the International Labor Organization (ILO) and FAO, industry, labor and civil society groups in a range of employment and geographical settings and across diverse populations of workers were identified. Conclusion: Global commitment to AOSH should be given the same focus as product quality, biosecurity, food safety and environmental sustainability in the sector. This needs development and implementation of integrated AOSH actions appropriate for diverse settings especially in low and middle-income countries encompassing greater uptake of international codes, better risk assessment and OSH management, adoption of technological innovations, effective OSH regulation and enforcement, adequate resources, training and information.
Entities:
Keywords:
Global aquaculture occupational health safety