Literature DB >> 31448635

Reach, Uptake, and Satisfaction of Three Delivery Modes of FUEL Your Life.

Heather M Padilla1, Heather Zuercher1, Melissa Robertson1, David M DeJoy1, Mark Wilson1, Robert J Vandenberg1, Phaedra S Corso1.   

Abstract

Background. FUEL Your Life (FYL) is a worksite translation of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). In a randomized controlled trial, participants in a phone coaching condition demonstrated greater weight loss compared to participants in a group coaching or self-study condition. The purpose of this article is to describe the differences in participant reach, intervention uptake, and participant satisfaction for each delivery mode. Method. Employees who were overweight, obese, or at high risk for diabetes were recruited from city-county governments. Process evaluation data were collected from health coach records, participant surveys, and research team records. Differences between groups were tested using Pearson chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance. Results. Employee reach of targeted enrollment was highest for the self-study condition. Overall, intervention uptake was highest in the phone coaching condition. Participants who received phone coaching had increased uptake of the participant manual and self-monitoring of food compared to participants who received group coaching or self-study. Discussion. FYL demonstrated that DPP could be effectively delivered in the worksite by three different modalities. When implemented in a self-study mode, reach is greater but intervention uptake is lower. Phone health coaching was associated with greater intervention exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes prevention program; health coach; obesity; process evaluation; translation; worksite health promotion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31448635      PMCID: PMC9534293          DOI: 10.1177/1524839919869921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  16 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Martin H Evans; Praphul Joshi
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-04

3.  A call for an end to the diet debates.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Bradley M Appelhans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  Robin Whittemore
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Effect of Intensity and Program Delivery on the Translation of Diabetes Prevention Program to Worksites: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fuel Your Life.

Authors:  Mark G Wilson; David M DeJoy; Robert J Vandenberg; Phaedra Corso; Heather Padilla; Heather Zuercher
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  A Prospective Programmatic Cost Analysis of Fuel Your Life: A Worksite Translation of DPP.

Authors:  Justin B Ingels; Rebecca L Walcott; Mark G Wilson; Phaedra S Corso; Heather M Padilla; Heather Zuercher; David M DeJoy; Robert J Vandenberg
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  The costs of obesity in the workplace.

Authors:  Eric A Finkelstein; Marco daCosta DiBonaventura; Somali M Burgess; Brent C Hale
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Development and validation of a patient self-assessment score for diabetes risk.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Alison M Edwards; Andrew S Bomback; Christie M Ballantyne; David Brillon; Mark A Callahan; Steven M Teutsch; Alvin I Mushlin; Lisa M Kern
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.