| Literature DB >> 31448571 |
Xue Gong1, Xu Liu1, Chen Li1, Chu Chen1, Jingfang Lin1, Aiqing Li1, Dongmei An1, Dong Zhou1, Zhen Hong1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diversity and composition of the fecal microbiota in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31448571 PMCID: PMC6764498 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Figure 1Flow chart depicting study enrollment.
Demographic data for the study populations.
| AE1 | AE2 | AE3 | Con | Pro > F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 10 | 7 | 13 | 12 | |
| Sex (Female/male) | 6/4 | 2/5 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 0.195 |
| MRI | 9/1 | 5/2 | 8/5 | 0/0 | <0.01 |
| CSF | 7/3 | 4/3 | 4/9 | 0/0 | <0.01 |
| EEG | 9/11 | 5/2 | 8/5 | 0/0 | <0.01 |
| Age (year) | 32.2 ± 13.2 | 37.1 ± 19.8 | 29 ± 10.6 | 30.4 ± 10.5 | 0.265 |
| Months of follow‐up | 0 ± 0 | 18.4 ± 13.4 | 17.6 ± 18.2 | 0 ± 0 | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m | 21.24 ± 2.76 | 21.03 ± 2.03 | 29.47 ± 3.21 | 21.61 ± 2.26 | 0.66 |
| Blood systolic pressure (mmHg) | 116.8 ± 10.5 | 124.4 ± 11 | 114.8 ± 10.4 | 112 ± 9 | 0.227 |
| Blood diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 74.7 ± 8.9 | 80.4 ± 9.2 | 71.9 ± 12.5 | 75 ± 9 | 0.892 |
| mRS scales | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0 ± 0 | <0.01 |
| Energy (kcal) | 2144.30 ± 288.53 | 2075.43 ± 243.69 | 1993.62 ± 212.84 | 2071.83 ± 195.41 | 0.49 |
| Protein (g) | 93.04 ± 19.52 | 93.66 ± 9.03 | 87.88 ± 8.51 | 87.63 ± 8.02 | 0.68 |
| Fat (g) | 48.12 ± 8.61 | 50.14 ± 12.89 | 52.73 ± 11.63 | 56.43 ± 11.69 | 0.36 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 316.78 ± 53.84 | 331.21 ± 56.16 | 316.05 ± 45.82 | 280.66 ± 52.83 | 0.15 |
| Fiber (g) | 25.26 ± 4.31 | 25.19 ± 7.73 | 21.32 ± 4.51 | 24.28 ± 6.00 | 0.40 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 521.50 ± 173.31 | 500.57 ± 166.03 | 530.92 ± 153.61 | 529.75 ± 157.39 | 0.98 |
| Vitamin A (µg/RE) | 471.30 ± 113.51 | 535.57 ± 212.23 | 628.00 ± 167.06 | 537.75 ± 150.51 | 0.15 |
| Thiamine (mg) | 1.76 ± 0.35 | 1.61 ± 0.35 | 1.49 ± 0.46 | 1.61 ± 0.54 | 0.55 |
| Riboflavin (mg) | 1.54 ± 0.26 | 1.52 ± 0.31 | 1.29 ± 0.24 | 1.57 ± 0.39 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin B6 (mg) | 0.47 ± 0.34 | 0.41 ± 0.35 | 0.53 ± 0.40 | 0.61 ± 0.12 | 0.51 |
| Vitamin B12 (µg) | 0.44 ± 0.89 | 0.34 ± 0.91 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.58 | 0.43 |
| Folvite (µg) | 646.20 ± 118.86 | 474.43 ± 101.36 | 600.99 ± 195.49 | 526.25 ± 104.14 | 0.16 |
| Niacin (mg) | 16.14 ± 2.02 | 17.33 ± 4.40 | 16.58 ± 2.21 | 18.21 ± 4.94 | 0.57 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 188.40 ± 59.92 | 158.36 ± 35.63 | 150.00 ± 35.31 | 151.08 ± 20.52 | 0.15 |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 31.77 ± 8.99 | 39.11 ± 16.33 | 31.56 ± 14.17 | 26.21 ± 8.35 | 0.10 |
| Ca (mg) | 690.10 ± 122.86 | 663.14 ± 110.56 | 723.23 ± 125.46 | 731.17 ± 160.42 | 0.67 |
| P (mg) | 1673.20 ± 149.79 | 1584.00 ± 94.74 | 1510.00 ± 119.32 | 1575.67 ± 183.27 | 0.07 |
| K (mg) | 2683.40 ± 184.28 | 2634.14 ± 272.71 | 2418.31 ± 221.89 | 2481.00 ± 297.24 | 0.10 |
| Na (mg) | 1712.30 ± 247.71 | 1702.29 ± 196.61 | 1677.77 ± 236.19 | 1906.21 ± 241.39 | 0.15 |
| Mg (mg) | 466.20 ± 111.48 | 421.29 ± 70.59 | 431.46 ± 84.54 | 411.00 ± 92.94 | 0.56 |
| Fe (mg) | 25.61 ± 5.97 | 21.80 ± 2.68 | 23.25 ± 2.30 | 23.10 ± 2.74 | 0.12 |
| Zn (mg) | 15.24 ± 1.20 | 15.05 ± 1.54 | 13.79 ± 1.57 | 14.47 ± 1.79 | 0.18 |
| Se (ug) | 63.99 ± 5.34 | 56.05 ± 6.80 | 59.66 ± 9.54 | 68.54 ± 16.00 | 0.07 |
| Cu (mg) | 3.36 ± 0.59 | 2.45 ± 0.77 | 2.77 ± 0.64 | 2.84 ± 0.75 | 0.15 |
| Mn (mg) | 8.35 ± 1.42 | 7.12 ± 1.93 | 7.48 ± 1.80 | 6.25 ± 1.94 | 0.06 |
| I (mg) | 153.99 ± 22.98 | 139.67 ± 34.79 | 143.21 ± 12.69 | 148.22 ± 35.37 | 0.64 |
| Vitamin D (µg) | 2.00 ± 0.84 | 2.27 ± 0.61 | 2.53 ± 0.82 | 2.28 ± 0.87 | 0.47 |
Measurement data are expressed as mean ± SD according to the normality of distribution.
χ2‐test
Wilcoxon rank sum test
Student’s t‐test
ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare the means of each nutrient among the four groups
EEG results were assessed by certified neurophysiologists, and MRI results were evaluated by a fellowship‐trained pediatric neuroradiologist with 10 years of postfellowship experience who was blinded to the original EEG and MRI report.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS): The scale runs from 0 to 6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. 0 ‐ No symptoms; 1 ‐ No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms; 2 ‐ Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities; 3 ‐ Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted; 4 ‐ Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted; 5 ‐ Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent; 6 ‐ Dead.f
Figure 2Differential operational taxonomic unit (OTU) abundance in different subgroups of anti‐NMDAR encephalitis patients relative to healthy controls. Venn diagram of core OTUs among each subgroup OTU clustering result.
Figure 3Relative abundance composition of the fecal microbiome in different patient groups and the control group. (A) Variations in the relative top 10 abundances of fecal bacterial taxa at the phylum level; (B) variations in the heatmap of the top 35 abundances of fecal bacterial taxa at the genus level; (C) box plot representation of the relative abundance ratio of the phyla Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes between subgroups of anti‐NMDAR encephalitis patient and healthy control profiles.
Figure 4Box plot representation of gut microbiota richness and diversity distribution across the histogram of alpha diversity indexes. (A) PD‐whole tree index to reflect the relationships of species within the community. The results suggest a distant species phylogeny relationship between different paired groups; (B) Chao1 estimator and (C) ACE estimator were used to identify community richness. The results suggest anti‐NMDAR encephalitis participants tended to have greater species richness (D) Coverage was used reflecting sequencing depth, which suggest that good coverage was achieved in the tests for all groups. (E) Shannon and (F) Simpson indexes were used to identify community diversity for both diversity and evenness between subgroups of patients and healthy controls, which suggests that there were no differences in both community diversity and species evenness between study subjects (*P < 0.05).
Figure 5Differences in bacterial composition between anti‐NMDAR encephalitis patients with various subgroups and controls. (A) The unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) scatter plot based on the Wilcox rank sum test of patients’ fecal sample composition structure showed the trend that the two groups were well separated from healthy controls. The first two components were 11.05% and 8.90%. (B) The PCoA analysis box plot showed a significant difference within all the subgroups compared to the healthy group (AE1 vs. AE2, P = 0.0779), (AE1 vs. AE3, P = 0.0616), (AE2 vs. AE3, P < 0.001***), (AE1 vs. Con, P < 0.0001 ****), (AE2 vs. Con, P < 0.001***), (AE3 vs. Con, P < 0.0001 ****)
Figure 6(A) LEfSe analysis was utilized to identify the “signature” taxa that are highlighted in the phylogenetic tree in cladogram format. (B) The LD scores showed at phylum, family, order, class, and genus level.