Literature DB >> 31448406

Impact of a Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme on allogeneic blood transfusions and related costs.

A Kaserer1, J Rössler1, J Braun2, F Farokhzad3, H-C Pape4, P Dutkowski4, A Plass4, T Horisberger1, J Volbracht3, M G Manz5, D R Spahn1.   

Abstract

A Patient Blood Management programme was established at the University Hospital of Zurich, along with a monitoring and feedback programme, at the beginning of 2014 with a first analysis reported in 2015. Our study aimed to investigate the further impact of this Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme on transfusion requirements and related costs. We included adult patients discharged between 2012 and 2017. A total of 213,882 patients underwent analysis: 66,659 patients in the baseline period (2012-2013); 35,309 patients in the year after the introduction of the Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme (2014) and 111,914 patients in the continued sustainability period (2015-2017). The introduction of the Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme reduced allogeneic blood product transfusions by 35%, from 825 units per 1000 hospital discharges in 2012 to 536 units in 2017. The most sustained effect was an approximately 40% reduction in red blood cell transfusions, from 535 per 1000 discharges to 319 units. Fewer patients were transfused in the periods after the introduction of the Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme (6251 (9.4%) vs. 2932 (8.3%) vs. 8196 (7.3%); p < 0.001). Compared with 2012, the yearly OR for being exposed to any blood transfusion declined steadily after the introduction of the Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme to 0.64 (95%CI 0.61-0.68; p < 0.001) in 2017. For patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transfusion requirements were also sustainably reduced. This reduction in allogeneic blood transfusions led to savings of 12,713,754 Swiss francs (£ 9,497,000 sterling; EUR 11,100,000; US$ 12,440,000) in blood product acquisition costs over 4 years. In-hospital mortality was not affected by the programme. The Patient Blood Management monitoring and feedback programme sustainably reduced transfusion requirements and related costs, without affecting in-hospital mortality.
© 2019 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Blood Management; adverse outcomes, mortality; allogeneic transfusion; healthcare costs; patient outcomes, monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31448406     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

Review 1.  Building a patient blood management program in a large-volume tertiary hospital setting: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  Serdar Günaydın; Donat R Spahn; Kanat Özışık; Aslı Demir; Göktan Aşkın; Doğan Emre Sert; Hale Bozkurt; Ali Şampiyon; Dilek Kazancı; Arnel Boke Kılıçlı; Şeref Alp Küçüker; Ümit Kervan; Mehmet Ali Özatik
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 0.332

2.  Characterising differences in red blood cell usage patterns between healthcare sectors in South Africa: 2014-2019.

Authors:  Larisse Bolton; Karin van den Berg; Ronél Swanevelder; Juliet R C Pulliam
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.752

3.  Preoperative iron treatment in anaemic patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley B Scrimshire; Alison Booth; Caroline Fairhurst; Alwyn Kotze; Mike Reed; Catriona McDaid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Making patient blood management the new norm(al) as experienced by implementors in diverse countries.

Authors:  Axel Hofmann; Donat R Spahn; Anke-Peggy Holtorf
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  When to transfuse your acute care patient? A narrative review of the risk of anemia and red blood cell transfusion based on clinical trial outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory M T Hare; Melina P Cazorla-Bak; S F Michelle Ku; Kyle Chin; Nikhil Mistry; Michael C Sklar; Katerina Pavenski; Ahmad Alli; Adriaan Van Rensburg; Jan O Friedrich; Andrew J Baker; C David Mazer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  How to detect a polytrauma patient at risk of complications: A validation and database analysis of four published scales.

Authors:  Sascha Halvachizadeh; Larissa Baradaran; Paolo Cinelli; Roman Pfeifer; Kai Sprengel; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Patient blood management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.

Authors:  D M Baron; M Franchini; S M Goobie; M Javidroozi; A A Klein; S Lasocki; G M Liumbruno; M Muñoz; A Shander; D R Spahn; K Zacharowski; P Meybohm
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.955

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.