| Literature DB >> 31447723 |
Yexi Leng1, Xi He1, Baijie Zhu2, Ping Li1, Chuan Xiao1, Weiqi He1.
Abstract
Everyone benefits from social networking as a daily tool, but there are potential addictions. However, little is known about the craving and excitability of social networking sites addiction, and mode of change in psychological craving. The study consisted of two experiments that used a cue-reactivity paradigm to study the cravings and excitement of social networking sites (SNSs) addiction and the changing regulars in cravings. Sixty subjects were divided into a high-score group and a low-score group. In Experiment 1, all subjects evaluated word clues. The results showed that the SNS-related clues only induced the craving and excitability of the high-score group, but not the low-score group, and the craving fluctuated. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, image clues were used. The results showed that the craving induced by an image clue is significantly higher than the craving induced by a word clue, and there is no difference in excitability. Taken together, our findings suggest the SNS-related stimulation, especially image clues, could significantly induce subjects for the craving and excitability of social networks, and the craving fluctuates.Entities:
Keywords: addiction; craving; cue-reactivity; excitability; social networking
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447723 PMCID: PMC6696620 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The paradigm used in the experiment.
Figure 2Comparison of pre- and post-craving measurements in Experiment 1. C1 is the pre-craving and C9 is post-craving. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3The change trend of craving in Experiment 1.
Figure 4Comparison of pre- and post-craving measurements in Experiment 2. C1 is the pre-craving and C9 is post-craving. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5The change trend of craving in Experiment 2.
Three-way AVONA of craving.
| SS | df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 192.604 | 1 | 246.556*** | 0.810 |
| Clue type | 5.704 | 1 | 5.474* | 0.086 |
| Stimulus material | 90.038 | 1 | 174.024*** | 0.750 |
| Group × clue type | 37.604 | 1 | 36.085*** | 0.384 |
| Group × stimulus material | 7.704 | 1 | 14.891*** | 0.204 |
| Clue type × stimulus material | 8.438 | 1 | 19.362*** | 0.250 |
| Group × clue type × stimulus material | 3.038 | 1 | 6.970* | 0.107 |
*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Analysis of excitability.
| High-score group | Low-score group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Arousal of SNS-related | 3.69 | 2.76 | −8.986*** |
| Urgency of SNS-related | 3.60 | 2.50 | −9.201*** |
| Arousal of neutral | 2.90 | 2.95 | 0.379 |
| Urgency of neutral | 2.79 | 2.71 | −0.713 |
***p < 0.001.
Analysis of excitability.
| High-score group | Low-score group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Arousal of SNS-related | 3.51 | 3.13 | −3.698*** |
| Urgency of SNS-related | 3.56 | 3.19 | −3.853*** |
| Arousal of neutral | 2.82 | 2.76 | −0.848 |
| Urgency of neutral | 2.77 | 2.74 | −0.383 |
***p < 0.001.
Three-way AVONA on arousal.
| SS | df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 6.478 | 1 | 26.835*** | 0.316 |
| Clue type | 10.417 | 1 | 112.596*** | 0.660 |
| Stimulus material | 0.026 | 1 | 0.118 | 0.002 |
| Group × clue type | 6.245 | 1 | 67.504*** | 0.538 |
| Group × stimulus material | 0.728 | 1 | 3.310 | 0.054 |
| Clue type × stimulus material | 0.808 | 1 | 7.957** | 0.121 |
| Group × clue type × stimulus material | 1.655 | 1 | 16.289*** | 0.219 |
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Three-way AVONA on urgency.
| SS | df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 2132.509 | 1 | 59.556*** | 0.507 |
| Clue type | 12.691 | 1 | 118.251*** | 0.671 |
| Stimulus material | 1.600 | 1 | 7.429** | 0.114 |
| Group × clue type | 7.111 | 1 | 66.256*** | 0.553 |
| Group × stimulus material | 2.278 | 1 | 10.577** | 0.154 |
| Clue type × stimulus material | 1.542 | 1 | 15.084*** | 0.206 |
| Group × clue type × stimulus material | 1.768 | 1 | 17.287*** | 0.230 |
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.