| Literature DB >> 31447589 |
Jian Chen1,2, Xiangru Wu3, Gang Ren1, Rong Cai4, Ting Gui1, Jianxi Zhao1, Huali Li1, Chen Guo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monitoring the fate of implanted cells over time in an experimental animal may provide a new way to track the metastatic process. Lymph node metastase is of extremely importance for the prognostic prediction of gastric carcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using micron-sized superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (MPIO), for monitoring of the fate of gastric cancer cells and detecting the migration of gastric cancer cells through the lymphatic system in a mouse model.Entities:
Keywords: gastric cancer; lymph node metastasis; magnetic iron oxide particles; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447589 PMCID: PMC6683948 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S206043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1In vitro dilution of MPIO in SGC-7901 cells that were exposed to a range of particle concentrations as measured by flow cytometry. (A) Flow cytometry data of labeling efficiency for different particle concentrations is shown. (B) Plots of flash green fluorescence intensity show that the average iron content of the SGC-7901 cells reached a plateau (90.0%) after 24 hrs of incubation with MPIO at a concentration of 49.2 mg iron/ml (based on unlabeled control sample).
Figure 2Representative cell samples of MPIO-labeled SGC-7901 cells at 1, 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 days after labeling. (A) Photomicrographs of MPIO-labeled cells show the rapid disappearance of iron in dividing cells. (B) Fluorescence microscopy of MPIO-labeled SGC-7901 cells show that iron-labeled cells could still be detected after 16 days of cell division.
Figure 3Coronal in vivo T2-weight images of labeled tumors over time and the corresponding PPB-stained sections. The tumor growth from iron-labeled SGC-7901 cells was monitored postinjection. The signal loss caused by the iron-labeled cells was evident at day 14 postinjection and persisted as the tumor developed. PPB-stained sections show the presence of iron-labeled cells within the tumor. (A) MR image of the labeled tumor. (B) PPB-stained section showing the iron content of labeled tumor over time.
Figure 4Appearance of labeled and unlabeled tumors over time and the corresponding T2 mapping colour images. (A, B) Conventional T2 images and pseudocolor images derived from T2 mapping images from mice at days 14, 21, 28, and 35 postinjection with labeled cells compared with images from the corresponding control groups. (C) The T2 values were compared over time between the labeled group and control group after injection of tumor cells (P<0.001).
Figure 5MRI and iron staining of an inguinal lymph node 35 days after injection of iron-labeled SGC-7901 cells in nude mice. (A) Coronal T2-weighted images of the primary tumor. (B) Axial T2-weighted image of the same mouse reveals a region of signal loss in the ipsilateral inguinal node (arrow). (C) Section of lymph node stained with PPB for iron detection at ×10 magnification shows iron-positive cells in the area of the node corresponding to the region signal loss in the MR image (arrow). (D) Iron-positive area of the node at ×40 magnification, where the MPIO beads can be seen (arrow), suggesting that the SGC-7901 cells have retained iron particles after migrating to the node.