| Literature DB >> 31447237 |
Zeno Sparchez1, Tudor Mocan2, Claudia Hagiu1, Gabriel Kacso3, Toader Zaharie4, Ioana Rusu4, Nadim Al Hajjar5, Daniel Corneliu Leucuta6, Mihaela Sparchez7.
Abstract
We aimed to compare contrast-enhanced-guided liver biopsy (CEUSLB) and ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (USLB) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) developed on a background of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Between 2011 and 2019, patients diagnosed with liver tumors on a background of ACLD were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the CEUSLB or USLB group. In total, 144 patients were randomly assigned to either CEUSLB (n = 79) or USLB (n = 65). Overall, in the CEUSLB group, the sensitivity was significantly better (94.74% vs. 74.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). Both the fragment length of the biopsy specimen and the single puncture success rate were statistically higher in the CEUSLB group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.0006, respectively). There was no difference in terms of major or minor complications (p = 0.682). CEUSLB is a feasible technique that increases the diagnostic sensitivity for liver tumors developed in ACLD.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced chronic liver disease; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound–guided liver biopsy; Focal liver lesions; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447237 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol ISSN: 0301-5629 Impact factor: 2.998