Literature DB >> 31447199

Developing theory- and evidence-based counseling for a health promotion intervention: A discussion paper.

Sanni Tiitinen1, Sakari Ilomäki1, Jaana Laitinen2, Eveliina Elisabet Korkiakangas3, Heli Hannonen2, Johanna Ruusuvuori1.   

Abstract

Although the use of theories and evidence is often stressed in the development of health promotion interventions, this does not guarantee the success of an intervention. Thus, we need to reflect on intervention development processes that use different types of theories and evidence. In this paper, we provide a reflective discussion on how we identified evidence-based behavior change techniques and counseling themes for a health promotion intervention. In addition, we discuss the challenges that we encountered and what we learned during the process: a) a lack of previous research and meta-analyses, b) inconsistencies in evidence, c) integrating evidence and theories that have different starting points, and d) collaborating with researchers who represent different evidence and theories. During the process, we benefitted from having the clear goal of conducting evidence- and theory-based work. We solved the challenges by, for example, utilizing different types of evidence and being reflective about the reasons behind any inconsistencies in the evidence. In retrospect, we would have benefitted from closer collaboration between the teams that worked separately with different evidence. These kinds of reflective descriptions of development processes and the challenges encountered during them may help other researchers and professionals avoid encountering the same challenges.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Behavior change; Counseling; Evidence; Theory; Work ability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31447199     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  1 in total

1.  The effects of counseling via a smartphone application on microentrepreneurs' work ability and work recovery: a study protocol.

Authors:  J Laitinen; E Korkiakangas; J P Mäkiniemi; S Tiitinen; P Tikka; H Oinas-Kukkonen; A M Simunaniemi; S Ahola; J Jaako; M Kekkonen; M Muhos; K Heikkilä-Tammi; H Hannonen; S Lusa; A Punakallio; J Oksa; S Mänttäri; S Ilomäki; A Logren; J Verbeek; J Ruotsalainen; J Remes; J Ruusuvuori; T Oksanen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.