Literature DB >> 31446171

Bt-induced hormesis in Bt-resistant insects: Theoretical possibility or factual concern?

Silvério O Campos1, Isabella V Santana1, Cleomar Silva2, Oscar F Santos-Amaya3, Raul Narciso C Guedes4, Eliseu José G Pereira5.   

Abstract

The biphasic dose-response of a stressor where low amounts of a toxicant may stimulate some biological processes is a recent focus of attention in insecticide ecotoxicology. Nonetheless, the importance and management consequences of this phenomenon of pesticide-induced hormesis remain largely unrecognized. Curiously, the potential induction of hormesis by insecticidal proteins such as Bacillus thuringiensis toxins (i.e., Bt toxins), a major agriculture pest management tool of widespread use, has been wholly neglected. Thus, we aimed to circumvent this shortcoming while assessing the potential occurrence of hormesis induced by the Bt toxin Cry1Fa in its main target pest species - the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. Concentration-response bioassays were carried out in a Bt-susceptible and a Bt-resistant population providing the purified Cry1Fa toxin in artificial diet and recording the insect demographic parameters. As significant hormetic effect was detected in both populations with a significant increase in the net reproductive rate and the intrinsic rate of population growth, the potential occurrence of Bt-induced hormesis was subsequently tested providing the insects with leaves from transgenic Bt maize expressing the toxic protein. The performance of the Bt-resistant insects was not different in both maize genotypes, indicating that the leaf expression of the Bt protein did not promote hormesis in the resistant insects. Thus, despite the Bt-induced hormesis detected in the purified protein bioassays, the phenomenon was not detected with current levels of Bt expression in maize minimizing the risk of this additional efficacy constraint besides that of field occurrence of Bt resistance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biphasic dose-response; Bt maize; Cry1Fa resistance; Fall armyworm; Pest outbreaks; Sublethal exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31446171     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  4 in total

1.  Impact of transgenic insect-resistant maize HGK60 with Cry1Ah gene on community components and biodiversity of arthropods in the fields.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Mengyun Ren; Libo Pan; Bo Liu; Xiao Guan; Jun Tao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Comparison of genetically modified insect-resistant maize and non-transgenic maize revealed changes in soil metabolomes but not in rhizosphere bacterial community.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Libo Pan; Mengyun Ren; Junsheng Li; Xiao Guan; Jun Tao
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Insecticide resistance in Australian Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) and development of testing procedures for resistance surveillance.

Authors:  Lisa Bird; Melina Miles; Adam Quade; Helen Spafford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of Insect-Resistant Maize 2A-7 Expressing mCry1Ab and mCry2Ab on the Soil Ecosystem.

Authors:  Shuke Yang; Xin Liu; Xiaohui Xu; Hongwei Sun; Fan Li; Chaofeng Hao; Xingbo Lu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.