Giorgia Olivieri1, Stefano Pro2, Daria Diodato3, Matteo Di Capua2, Daniela Longo4, Diego Martinelli1, Enrico Bertini3, Carlo Dionisi-Vici5. 1. Division of Metabolism, Department of Pediatric Specialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. 2. Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRRCS, Rome, Italy. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Muscular and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. 4. Neuroradiology Unit, Imaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRRCS, Rome, Italy. 5. Division of Metabolism, Department of Pediatric Specialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. carlo.dionisivici@opbg.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome is a rare disorder of urea cycle characterized by progressive pyramidal and cerebellar dysfunction, whose pathophysiology is not yet fully understood. Here we describe the spectrum of the long fibers involvement in HHH syndrome, attempting a correlation between clinical, electrophysiological and neuro-radiological data. METHODS: Nine HHH patients were longitudinally evaluated by clinical examination, neurophysiological assessment including motor (MEPs), somato-sensory evoked potentials (PESS) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV), brain and spinal cord MRI RESULTS: All patients had pyramidal dysfunction and 3/9 an overt spastic paraplegia. Mild to moderate cerebellar signs were found in 7/9, intellectual disability in 8/9. At lower limbs, MEPs resulted abnormal in 7/8 patients and PESS in 2/8; peripheral sensory-motor neuropathy was found in 1/9. MRI documented atrophic changes in supra-tentorial brain regions in 6/9 patients, cerebellum in 6/9, spinal cord in 3/7. CONCLUSIONS: A predominant corticospinal dysfunction is evident in HHH syndrome, along with milder cerebellar signs, intellectual disability of variable degree and rare peripheral neuropathy. Phenotypical similarities with other disorders affecting the urea cycle (argininemia and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase deficiency) suggest possible common mechanisms contributing in the maintenance of the corticospinal tract integrity. HHH syndrome phenotype largely overlaps with complex Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias (HSPs), in the list of which it should be included, emphasizing the importance to screen all the unsolved cases of HSPs for metabolic biomarkers.
BACKGROUND:Hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome is a rare disorder of urea cycle characterized by progressive pyramidal and cerebellar dysfunction, whose pathophysiology is not yet fully understood. Here we describe the spectrum of the long fibers involvement in HHH syndrome, attempting a correlation between clinical, electrophysiological and neuro-radiological data. METHODS: Nine HHHpatients were longitudinally evaluated by clinical examination, neurophysiological assessment including motor (MEPs), somato-sensory evoked potentials (PESS) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV), brain and spinal cord MRI RESULTS: All patients had pyramidal dysfunction and 3/9 an overt spastic paraplegia. Mild to moderate cerebellar signs were found in 7/9, intellectual disability in 8/9. At lower limbs, MEPs resulted abnormal in 7/8 patients and PESS in 2/8; peripheral sensory-motor neuropathy was found in 1/9. MRI documented atrophic changes in supra-tentorial brain regions in 6/9 patients, cerebellum in 6/9, spinal cord in 3/7. CONCLUSIONS: A predominant corticospinal dysfunction is evident in HHH syndrome, along with milder cerebellar signs, intellectual disability of variable degree and rare peripheral neuropathy. Phenotypical similarities with other disorders affecting the urea cycle (argininemia and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase deficiency) suggest possible common mechanisms contributing in the maintenance of the corticospinal tract integrity. HHH syndrome phenotype largely overlaps with complex Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias (HSPs), in the list of which it should be included, emphasizing the importance to screen all the unsolved cases of HSPs for metabolic biomarkers.
Hyperornithinemia–hyperammonemia–homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome (OMIM # 238970), caused by mutations in ORNT1 (SLC25A15) gene, is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of the urea cycle [1, 2]. The metabolic triad of hyperammonemia, hyperornithinemia and homocitrullinuria establishes the diagnosis. Clinical manifestations are widely heterogeneous, ranging from neonatal life-threatening hyperammonemic crises to milder forms with onset at variable ages. Once the treatment is started, the clinical course is usually stable, but a progressive lower limb spasticity and a cerebellar dysfunction appear in most cases, leading to mild gait disturbance up to loss of deambulation [3-7]. Intellectual disability of variable degree and, more rarely, focal dystonia and myoclonus may also occur [3-6]. Pathophysiology of pyramidal and cerebellar dysfunction remains to be elucidated. To date, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies have been conducted only in few patients. Somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and peripheral nerve conduction velocity (NCV) were occasionally found to be abnormal [6]. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have been rarely performed and, despite pyramidal dysfunction is presumed to be progressive, no longitudinal studies have been reported so far [4, 5]. Similarly, available neuroimaging data are mostly based on anecdotal descriptions [5, 8–12]. Herein we describe neurological, neurophysiological and neuroradiological findings, collected over a 15-year follow-up, in 9 HHHpatients. We aimed to correlate long motor and sensitive tracts and peripheral nervous system involvement with neuroimaging and neuro-functional outcome data.
Patients and methods
We report on 9 patients (5 female, 4 male; mean age at last examination 24.4 ± 16.3 years; range 7–52.6), with genetically confirmed HHH syndrome, regularly followed at the Division of Metabolism of the Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital in Rome. The early course and molecular abnormalities of 8/9 patients have been reported in previous studies [3, 5, 12–15]. Clinical features are summarized in Table 1. Follow-up had a mean duration of 15.9 ± 12.6 years (range 3–34 years) and encompassed clinical, neurological, neurophysiological and neuro-radiological data, retrospectively reviewed and prospectively integrated whenever necessary.
Table 1
Main clinical and genetic features in nine patients with HHH syndrome
PtGender (age at last evaluation)
Genotype
Onset
Diagnosis
Previous coma
Previous lethargy
Seizures/ myoclonus
Intellectual disabilty
Adaptive functions
Reference
Daily activity
Employment/ scholarization
1
male (53 years)
79G > A/79G > A
G27R/G27R
2 yrs
41 yrs
+
+
–
borderline
1
+ (1)
[3, 12]
2
male (44 years)
535C > T/535C > T
R179X/R179X
12 yrs
26 yrs
–
+
+
mild
2
none (2)
[3, 5]
3
male (35 years)
861insG/861insG
S90X/S90X
14 d
2 yrs
+
+
+
severe
3
none (3)
[3, 5, 14]
4
female (34 years)
79G > A/79G > A
G27R/G27R
4 d
3 mo
+
–
+
borderline
1
+ (1)
[3, 5, 13, 14]
5
female (34 years)
824G > A/824G > A
R275Q/R275Q
3 yrs
7 yrs
–
+
–
moderate
2
none (3)
[3, 5, 15]
6
male (29 years)
IVS5 + 1G > A/IVS5 + 1G/A (exon skipping)
18 yrs
21 yrs
+
+
+
borderline
3
none (3)
[3, 5]
7a
female
(12 years)
79G > A/823C > G
G27R/R275G
1 yr
8 yrs
–
–
–
borderline
1
+ (2)
[3]
8a
female (8 years)
79G > A/823C > G
G27R/R275G
1 yr
4 yrs (prospective)
–
–
–
borderline
1
+ (2)
[3]
9
female (8 years)
68G > A/86C > G
C23Y/P29R
1 yr
5 yrs
–
–
–
no (selective skills impairment)
1
+ (2)
Legend: aSiblings. For adaptive functions: 1 = autonomous, 2 = assisted; 3 = dependent. yrs years, mo months, d days, + present, – absent
Main clinical and genetic features in nine patients with HHH syndrome1male (53 years)79G > A/79G > AG27R/G27R2male (44 years)535C > T/535C > TR179X/R179X3male (35 years)861insG/861insGS90X/S90X4female (34 years)79G > A/79G > AG27R/G27R5female (34 years)824G > A/824G > AR275Q/R275Q6male (29 years)7afemale(12 years)79G > A/823C > GG27R/R275G8afemale (8 years)79G > A/823C > GG27R/R275G9female (8 years)68G > A/86C > GC23Y/P29RLegend: aSiblings. For adaptive functions: 1 = autonomous, 2 = assisted; 3 = dependent. yrs years, mo months, d days, + present, – absent
Neurological assessment
Spastic paraparesis was assessed according to Harding [16], and the severity of the motor phenotype was evaluated by the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) [17]. Central and peripheral somato-sensory signs, and cerebellar signs were evaluated as well.
Neurophysiological assessment
Long fibers tract assessment encompassed MEPs at upper and lower limbs for the corticospinal tract, and SSEPs at lower limbs for the afferent somato-sensory tracts. Neurophysiological assessments were completed by NCV at lower limbs.MEPs recordings were performed at the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle for the upper limbs, and at the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle or, in few cases, at the abductor hallucis (AH) muscle for the lower limbs. Assessments consisted in the recording of the central motor conduction time (CMCT) at the target muscle, in both conditions of rest and of slight tonic voluntary contraction (facilitation). CMCT values were considered abnormal if > 20 ms or with a side-to-side difference > 2 ms [18]. Normative CMCT values were obtained from literature data for adult patients [19] and from studies performed at our hospital on healthy age-matched subjects for pediatric ones. SSEPs were measured at the posterior tibial muscle by the central sensory conduction time (CSCT). Motor NCV was recorded at the popliteus sciaticus internus (PSI) or popliteus sciaticus externus (PSE) nerves, and sensory NCV at the sural nerve. In all the cases, single assessments encompassed side-to side recordings and mean values between right and left side were considered.
Neuroradiological assessment
MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5 or 3-Tesla MR scanner, and included sagittal T1w, axial T2w, FLAIR and diffusion weighted images. As comprehensive of all the required sequences, three brain MRI assessments performed in other institutions were considered as well. Images have been evaluated for the evidence of supra-tentorial, sub-tentorial, spinal cord involvement, and corpus callosum abnormalities. To assess the severity of atrophy in each area, and its progression over follow-up, a severity score was designed: - (absent/normal), + (mild), ++ (moderate), +++ (severe).
Results
Table 2 summarizes the neurological findings at follow-up. All patients showed variable signs of pyramidal dysfunction, and an overt spastic paraplegia was detected in 3/9 patients. The remaining ones showed milder symptoms, such as lower limbs hyperreflexia or bilateral clonus. Seven out of 9 patients had mild to moderate cerebellar signs. Notably, the two patients lacking cerebellar symptoms were the youngest in our cohort. At last examination, all patients were able to walk alone for few meters at least, except for patient #3 who was wheelchair-bound since the age of 20 years. Romberg’s test was assessed in 8/9 patients and resulted negative. Peripheral neuropathy was clinically evident only in patient #3. As assessed by SPRS, spasticity severity reached a median score of 17.8/54 (SD ±15.4), and no correlation was found when SPRS scores were matched with age at evaluation (p = > 0.05). Eight out of 9 patients had an intellectual disability of variable degree.
Table 2
Main neurological, neurophysiological and neuroradiological findings at last follow-up in nine patients with HHH syndrome
Pt (age at last evaluation)
Higher motor ability
Spastic paraplegia
Pyramidal signs
SPRS (max 52)
Cerebellar signs
Somato-sensory signs
Neuropathysigns
Lower limb neurophysiological findings
Romberg Discrimination touch Vibration
Pain Termic Protopatic touch
MEPs (CMCT)
SSEPs (CSCT)
NCV
rest/ facilitation
motor
sensory
1 (53 years)
run
–
+
9
+
–
–
–
NE/NE
delayed
normal
normal
2 (44 years)
deambulant with assistance
+
+
31
+
–
–
–
delayed/delayed
normal
normal
normal
3 (35 years)
wheelchair bound
+
+
44
+
nd
nd
+
nd
nd
NE
NE
4 (34 years)
deambulant
–
+
13
+
–
–
–
NE/ normal
normal
normal
normal
5 (34 years)
deambulant
–
+
20
+
–
–
–
NE/normal
normal
normal
normal
6 (29 years)
deambulant with assistance
+
+
37
+
–
–
–
NE/delayed
normal
normal
normal
7 (12 years)
run
–
+
4
+
–
–
–
normal/normal
normal
normal
normal
8 (8 years)
run
–
+
2
–
–
–
–
delayed/delayed
normal
normal
normal
9 (8 years)
run
–
+
1
–
–
–
–
NE/delayed
delayed
normal
normal
Legend: CMCT Central motor conduction time, CSCT Central sensory conduction time, FU Follow-up, MEPs Motor evoked potentials, NCV Nerve conduction velocity, NE Not evocable, nd not done, SSEPs Somato-sensory evoked potentials, SPRS Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale, + present, – absent
Main neurological, neurophysiological and neuroradiological findings at last follow-up in nine patients with HHH syndromeLegend: CMCT Central motor conduction time, CSCT Central sensory conduction time, FU Follow-up, MEPs Motor evoked potentials, NCV Nerve conduction velocity, NE Not evocable, nd not done, SSEPs Somato-sensory evoked potentials, SPRS Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale, + present, – absentClinical assessment of the somato-sensory system (performed in 8/9 patients) resulted invariable negative. However, beside some easily recognizable neurological signs (e.g. Romberg test), the ones depending on patient’s perception (e.g. discriminative and protopatic touch, sense of vibration, pain, heat) resulted often difficult to assess, because of the cognitive impairment of the patients themselves.One patient (#3) was excluded due to peripheral neuropathy, and neurophysiological assessment was finally performed in 8/9 patients.
Central motor pathway
Lower limb MEPs were recorded at TA muscle in 7/8 patients and at AH muscle in 1/8 patient (#6). One patient (#4) underwent recordings at both the muscles over its follow-up. Seven out of eight patients were tested at least twice (mean interval between first and last assessment 8.3 ± 6.9 years). Recordings at TA muscles showed mean CMCT 21.2 ± 4.8 ms at relaxed muscle (n.v. 15.9 ± 1.5) and 18.0 ± 4.4 ms at facilitation [n.v.12.5 ± 1.5 [19] for adults; 11.5 ± 1.6 for paediatric patients]. Longitudinal neurophysiological data for each patient are showed in Table 3. Mean TA CMCT values compared to healthy controls are shown in Fig. 1. Recordings at HA muscle showed no evocable response at relaxed muscle and a mean CMCT 21.0 ± 1.7 ms at facilitation [n.v. 16.9 ± 0.9 [20]]. At last follow-up, MEPs resulted pathological (absent or delayed) in 7/8 patients (87.5%) at rest, and in 5/8 (62.5%) at facilitation.
Table 3
Longitudinal MEPs values in 9 patients with HHH syndrome
Pt
CMCT (ms) at rest/facilitation
I
II
III
IV
V
1
NE/23.5
NE/NE
–
–
–
2
19/18.6
19.5/18.9
20.3/19.45
23.4/20,25
26.35/21.25
3
–
–
–
–
–
4
NE/14.5
NE/15.0
aNE/19.2
aNE/20.0
–
5
NE/12.1
NE/12.3
–
–
–
6
aNE/22.0
aNE/22.9
–
–
–
7
16.6/12.5
21.8/12.8
15.9/11.6
–
–
8
27.6/22.8
–
–
–
–
9
NE/25.4
NE/17.45
NE/21.95
–
–
Legend: recordings were performed at tibialis anterior muscle (TA), or at abductor halluces (AH) musclea. NE Not evocable, – not done
Fig. 1
Lower limbs motor evoked potential (MEPs) in eight patients with HHH syndrome. Mean central motor conduction time (CMCT) at rest and during muscle facilitation (tibialis anterior muscle) in HHH patients (grey bars) in comparison with healthy controls (white bars). Values are expressed as milliseconds (ms)
Longitudinal MEPs values in 9 patients with HHH syndromeLegend: recordings were performed at tibialis anterior muscle (TA), or at abductor halluces (AH) musclea. NE Not evocable, – not doneLower limbs motor evoked potential (MEPs) in eight patients with HHH syndrome. Mean central motor conduction time (CMCT) at rest and during muscle facilitation (tibialis anterior muscle) in HHHpatients (grey bars) in comparison with healthy controls (white bars). Values are expressed as milliseconds (ms)Upper limb MEPs were recorded in 3/8 patients, with one patient tested twice at an interval of 5 years. Values resulted within the normal range with a mean CMCT 9.9 ± 1.7 ms [n.v. 7.9 ± 2.1; +3SD =14.2 [21]].
Central somato-sensory pathways
All patients but one (#5) were tested at least twice (mean interval between first and last assessment 7.1 ± 6.9 years). Mean CSCT was 19.8 ± 3.9 ms [n.v. 16.4 ± 1.4; +3SD = 20.6 [22, 23]]. Patient # 8 showed a progressively improving trend from infancy to adolescence, reaching borderline/normal values at 9 years. At last follow up, 2/9 patients showed abnormal responses (#1, 9). No correlation between SSEPs values and clinical findings were found.
Peripheral nerve conduction
Assessments included 14 PSI, 10 PSE and 16 sural nerve recordings in 8/9 patients. Six patients were tested at least twice (mean interval between first and last evaluation 6.7 ± 9.6 years). Eight out of 9 patients showed normal results [24]. Patient #3 showed progressively worsening NCVs with no evocable responses since the age of 18 years.
Neuroradiological findings
Assessments included 14 brain and 7 spinal cord MRI. All patients underwent at least one brain MRI. Brain neuro-radiological findings at follow-up are shown in Fig. 2. Atrophic changes were found in supratentorial and/or subtentorial regions in 7/9 patients. As shown in Table 4, atrophy involved supra-tentorial white matter in 6/9 patients, mild in 2 and moderate in 4. As for sub-tentorial regions, 6/9 patients showed mild atrophic changes of cerebellar vermis. Corpus callosum abnormalities were found in 5/9 patients with mild atrophy in 3 and moderate in 2. Four out of 9 patients (# 2, 4, 5, 6) underwent two or more brain MRI (mean age at baseline 19.4 ± 10.0 years; mean interval between first and last assessment 8.7 ± 2.9 years) with two patients (#2 and 5) showing a worsening trend over years.
Fig. 2
Brain MRI in patients with HHH syndrome. T2 weighted axial (upper panel), coronal (middle panel), and T1 weighted sagittal (lower panel) brain MRI. Atrophy of variable degree is detected in supra-tentorial region (moderate in patients #2, 3, 5 and 6; mild in patient # 4; absent in patients #8, and 9), corpus callosum (moderate in patients #3 and 5; mild in patients # 2, 4 and 6; absent in patients # 8 and 9) and cerebellum (mild in patients #2, 4, 5, 6 and 9, absent in patients # 3, and 8)
Table 4
Main neuroradiological findings over follow-up in 9 patients with HHH syndrome
Brain MRI in patients with HHH syndrome. T2 weighted axial (upper panel), coronal (middle panel), and T1 weighted sagittal (lower panel) brain MRI. Atrophy of variable degree is detected in supra-tentorial region (moderate in patients #2, 3, 5 and 6; mild in patient # 4; absent in patients #8, and 9), corpus callosum (moderate in patients #3 and 5; mild in patients # 2, 4 and 6; absent in patients # 8 and 9) and cerebellum (mild in patients #2, 4, 5, 6 and 9, absent in patients # 3, and 8)Main neuroradiological findings over follow-up in 9 patients with HHH syndromeLegend: +, mild; ++, moderate; +++, severe; absent, −. n.d not doneNeuroradiological findings at spinal cord are shown in Fig. 3. Spinal cord atrophy was detected in 3/7 patients (Table 4). In one patient (#3), the neuroradiological features were consistent with the particularly severe clinical and neurophysiological outcome.
Fig. 3
Spinal cord MRI in patients with HHH syndrome. T1 weighted spinal cord MRI showed atrophy of variable degree (severe in patients #3, moderate in patient #2, mild in patient #4, and absent in patients #5, 8 and 9)
Spinal cord MRI in patients with HHH syndrome. T1 weighted spinal cord MRI showed atrophy of variable degree (severe in patients #3, moderate in patient #2, mild in patient #4, and absent in patients #5, 8 and 9)
Discussion
This study reports on the longitudinal description of neurological, neurophysiological and neuroradiological patterns in HHH syndrome. In our cohort, pyramidal signs were invariably present, with an overt picture of spastic paraplegia detectable in one third of the cases. Other clinical features encompassed a cognitive impairment of variable degree, a frequent cerebellar dysfunction, and more rarely a secondary peripheral neuropathy, which enlarges the spectrum of the phenotypic disease severity. Characteristically, clinical signs of central sensory dysfunction were never observed. Neurophysiological data confirmed a prominent involvement of the primary motor descending pathway compared to the long fibers sensory tracts, and a less frequent involvement of peripheral nerve. Neuroradiological studies, despite not completed by diffusion tensor imaging techniques, confirmed the prominent affection of the regions anatomically corresponding to pyramidal tract (frontal subcortical white matter and, in the most severe cases, cortical gray matter as well). With regard to the final clinical outcome, our findings show heterogeneous profiles, which are apparently independent from the age at evaluation, from the age of treatment initiation, as well as from the length of the disease course, which is particularly difficult to assess in patients who never experienced overt hyperammonemia, which correspond to one third of our cohort.The association of lower limbs spasticity with mild cerebellar signs, cognitive impairment, and possible neuropathy indicates that HHH syndrome should be listed among the hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs). In particular, given its composite phenotypic picture, HHH syndrome fulfills the diagnostic criteria of complex HSPs [25].Nowadays, HSPs encompass more than 80 loci and over 60 genes [26, 27], nevertheless, many conditions remain undiagnosed, suggesting that new genetic determinants still remains to be identified.With regard to neurophysiological findings in HHH syndrome, our data are consistent with the clinical picture, highlighting the predominant involvement of the descending motor tracts compared to the ascending sensory ones. MEPs recorded at lower limbs showed delayed or not evocable response in about 90% of our patients. This occurred in both adults and children, showing a progressive worsening trend over time. A slowing-down, up to the loss, of an evocable response of CMCT was mostly detectable at rest at first evaluation, but it progressively involved the response also at muscle contraction at follow-up. This is in line with the neurophysiological response to a progressive neuronal degeneration in which a pathological response at rest can be hided or mitigated in facilitation conditions, when higher threshold and faster pyramidal neurons are recruited [28, 29]. What follows is that the SPRS scale, which scores spastic paraplegia according to patient’s age and disease duration, is not an optimal tool to quantify the severity of pyramidal dysfunction in HHH syndrome.Contrarily to MEPs, SSEPs resulted unaltered in the most of our patients. Accordingly, clinical signs of sensory defects were never recorded, not even in the two patients who showed mildly delayed SSEPs values.Neuroradiological data also confirm a slow progression of the disease. Atrophy primarily affects the subcortical white matter and, in the most severe cases, mildly involving cortical gray matter as well, whilst cerebellum is less affected. These findings are in line with literature reports on brain lesions observed in urea cycle disorders, which selectively and primarily affects the deep white matter [30]. Since the disease course in HHH syndrome is usually stable, with low risk of hyperammonemia once diet and pharmacological therapy are started, brain lesions are milder if compared to other urea cycle disorders, presenting a more severe long-term course [31, 32]. Therefore, brain abnormalities detected in HHH syndrome are likely to be not only dependent on the severity and duration of hyperammonemia alone. In fact, the 4/9 patients in our cohort who experienced hyperammonemic coma showed heterogeneous MRI findings: #3 and #6 had the most severe clinical and neuroradiological outcome, while #1 and #4 had mild lesions, comparable to those of patients who never experienced severe hyperammonemia.Concerning spinal cord, MRI changes suggest a correlation with the clinical outcome, with the most severe atrophic degeneration observed in patients with the higher SPRS score (patient #3 who is wheelchair bound, and patient #2 who hardly maintains autonomous gait, only for a few steps). Although spinal cord atrophy progression rate cannot be determined since patients underwent a single MRI study, the ongoing trend of neurophysiological assessments suggest a similar evolution.Clinical, neurophysiological and neuroradiological findings in HHH syndrome resemble those observed in argininemia and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) deficiency [33-36], two other disorders of aminoacid metabolism connected to the distal part of the urea cycle (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Urea cycle and related pathways. The illustration shows the biochemical pathways connecting HHH syndrome, argininemia and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase deficiency (gray boxes), the three disorders of aminoacid metabolism related to the distal part of the urea cycle sharing phenotypic similarities. AGAT, l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase; ASL, argininosuccinate lyase; ASS, argininosuccinate synthetase; CPS, carbamyl-phosphate synthetase; GAA, guanidinoacetate; GAMT, guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase; OAT, ornithine aminotransferase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; ORNT1, ornithine/citrulline antiporter; OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase; P5C, pyrroline-5-carboxylate; P5CR, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase; P5CS, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase
Urea cycle and related pathways. The illustration shows the biochemical pathways connecting HHH syndrome, argininemia and pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase deficiency (gray boxes), the three disorders of aminoacid metabolism related to the distal part of the urea cycle sharing phenotypic similarities. AGAT, l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase; ASL, argininosuccinate lyase; ASS, argininosuccinate synthetase; CPS, carbamyl-phosphate synthetase; GAA, guanidinoacetate; GAMT, guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase; OAT, ornithine aminotransferase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; ORNT1, ornithine/citrulline antiporter; OTC, ornithine transcarbamylase; P5C, pyrroline-5-carboxylate; P5CR, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase; P5CS, pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthaseIt is noteworthy that, as in HHH syndrome, these diseases are associated with spastic paraplegia, variable cognitive impairment and possible cerebellar signs, then suggesting possible common mechanisms connecting urea cycle-related pathways with the maintenance of the cortico-spinal tract integrity [37]. Possible shared mechanisms include abnormalities of arginine, creatine, polyamines, and proline metabolism, and dysregulation of the autophagy machinery, this last representing a known cause of some HSPs [38].
Conclusions
Our study highlights the progressive involvement of the corticospinal tract in HHH syndrome. With regard to neurophysiological data, corticospinal system dysfunction resulted clearly predominant if compared to central sensory system and to peripheral nervous system. MEPs showed a pathological pattern with a progressive worsening trend with age. Although the cause of the selective involvement of cortical spinal tract in HHH syndrome remains to be elucidated, the similarities with argininemia and P5CS deficiency, suggest possible common pathophysiological mechanisms.The presence of pyramidal signs/lower limb spasticity associated with cerebellar signs and cognitive impairment, highlights the importance to list HHH syndrome among the complex form of HSPs.
Authors: T Miyamoto; N Kanazawa; S Kato; M Kawakami; Y Inoue; T Kuhara; T Inoue; K Takeshita; S Tsujino Journal: J Hum Genet Date: 2001 Impact factor: 3.172
Authors: Stefania Zampatti; Marco Castori; Bjoern Fischer; Paola Ferrari; Livia Garavelli; Carlo Dionisi-Vici; Emanuele Agolini; Anita Wischmeijer; Eva Morava; Giuseppe Novelli; Johannes Häberle; Uwe Kornak; Francesco Brancati Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Diego Martinelli; Johannes Häberle; Vicente Rubio; Cecilia Giunta; Ingrid Hausser; Rosalba Carrozzo; Nadine Gougeard; Clara Marco-Marín; Bianca M Goffredo; Maria Chiara Meschini; Elsa Bevivino; Sara Boenzi; Giovanna Stefania Colafati; Francesco Brancati; Matthias R Baumgartner; Carlo Dionisi-Vici Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: J F Lemay; M A Lambert; G A Mitchell; M Vanasse; D Valle; J F Arbour; J Dubé; J Flessas; M Laberge; L Lafleur Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 4.406