Literature DB >> 31443639

Novel nonsense variants in SLURP1 and DSG1 cause palmoplantar keratoderma in Pakistani families.

Abida Akbar1,2, Claire Prince2, Chloe Payne2, James Fasham2, Wasim Ahmad3, Emma L Baple2, Andrew H Crosby2, Gaurav V Harlalka2,4, Asma Gul5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inherited palmoplantar keratodermas (PPKs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous and phenotypically diverse group of genodermatoses characterized by hyperkeratosis of the palms and soles. More than 20 genes have been reported to be associated with PPKs including desmoglein 1 (DSG1) a key molecular component for epidermal adhesion and differentiation. Mal de Meleda (MDM) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive genodermatosis characterized by transgrediens PPK, associated with mutations in the secreted LY6/PLAUR domain containing 1 (SLURP1) gene.
METHODS: This study describes clinical as well as genetic whole exome sequencing (WES) and di-deoxy sequencing investigations in two Pakistani families with a total of 12 individuals affected by PPK.
RESULTS: WES identified a novel homozygous nonsense variant in SLURP1, and a novel heterozygous nonsense variant in DSG1, as likely causes of the conditions in each family.
CONCLUSIONS: This study expands knowledge regarding the molecular basis of PPK, providing important information to aid clinical management in families with PPK from Pakistan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DSG1; Exome sequencing; Mal de Meleda; Mutation; Palmoplantar keratoderma; SLURP1; Variant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31443639      PMCID: PMC6708247          DOI: 10.1186/s12881-019-0872-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Background

Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) is a heterogeneous entity of both genetics and acquired keratinization disorder, which is characterized by persistent marked epidermal thickening of palms and soles [1]. Hereditary PPKs comprising an increasing number of entities with different prognoses, which may be associate with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations [2]. Depending on different patterns of hyperkeratosis, PPKs are further classified into four distinct types: diffuse, striate, focal and punctate [3, 4]. So far, deleterious mutations in > 20 genes have been reported in pathogenesis of different forms of hereditary PPKs [3, 4]. In last few years, advent of cutting edge genetic techniques such as whole genome microarray scans and whole exome sequencing have incredibly accelerated the identification of disease causing variants in many genes involved in various inherited forms of PPKs, and thus significantly increasing understanding about intricate molecular mechanisms of heterogeneous disorders, consecutively aiding valuable genetic counselling and patient care [3]. Mal de Meleda (MDM), a type of transgradient palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK), is a rare autosomal recessive disorder. Luca Stulli, a Croatian born scientist in 1826 first described Mal de Meleda on the Adriatic Meleda island (now Mljet) [5]. The disease can feature other potentially disfiguring effects on the hands and feet that can severely impact function. The disease onset is soon after birth and is clinically characterized by erythema, transgradients and progradients hyperkeratosis of palms and soles with well demarcated borders and hypohydrosis. Other associated features are brachydactyly, nail abnormalities and lichenoid plaques [6]. Rigorous keratoderma can lead to deformity in hands and feet and gradually this may results into severe impairment [7, 8]. Furthermore, previous reports have shown that MDM may be caused due to mutations in the SLURP1 gene (previously known as ARS-B gene) encoding a secreted toxin-like mammalian lymphocyte antigen 6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor-related protein 1(SLURP1). Expression of SLURP1 is reported in epithelium, stomach, sensory nerve cells, gums, esophagus and immune cells with highest level in keratinocytes especially in palms and soles [9-11]. Striate PPK type I is a rare type of PPK and shows the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance associated with DGS1 heterozygous mutation. Clinical features of this condition are linear hyperkeratotic lesions on the palms extending along the length of fingers and associated with thick patches of diffuse hyperkeratosis on the soles [12]. Heterozygous mutation in DSG1 gene in an autosomal dominant pattern have also been reported in focal PPK in a Libyan family, and in a Jewish Yemenite family with diffuse PPK [13, 14], a discovery which elucidates that different patterns of palmoplantar involvement may result from mutations in the DSG1 gene. Additionally, bi-allelic mutations in DSG1 gene have also been recently reported in the severe SAM syndrome, characterized by sinusitis, palmoplantar keratoderma, erythroderma, multiple allergies and metabolic defects, with heterozygous mutation carriers only presenting hyperkeratotic palmoplantar lesions [15]. Here we report findings regarding investigations of two families from Pakistan with clinically-defined PPK, for which the specific genetic basis was unclear.

Methods

Genetic studies

The research work presented in this manuscript was approved by the Ethical Review Boards Committee at International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan (IIUI; Pakistan). Informed written consent was obtained for all participants for the collection of blood samples, with clinical evaluations and family histories performed by a dermatologist. Extraction of high quality genomic DNA from the whole blood was carried out by using the ReliaPrep™ kit (Blood gDNA Miniprep System, Promega) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was undertaken on a NextSeq500 (Illumina, CA, San Diego, USA) with targeting using Agilent Sure select Whole Exome v6. The reads were aligned using BWA-MEM (v0.7.12), with mate-pairs fixed and duplicates removed using Picard (v1.129). InDel realignment and base quality recalibration were performed using GATK (v3.4–46). SNVs and InDels were detected using GATK Haplotype Caller or SnpEff tool (http://snpeff.sourceforge.net/SnpEff_manual.html), and annotated using Alamut batch (v1.4.4). Read depth was determined for the whole exome using GATK Depth of Coverage. Primer3 web software was used to design the allele-specific primers (primer sequences are available upon request) to validate and verify the segregation of identified variants via Sanger sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for all affected and healthy individuals of recruited families by using allele-specific primers following standard conditions, with products sequenced by Source Bio-Science Life Sciences (https://www.sourcebioscience.com/).

Results

Subjects

Pedigree analysis was indicative of an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern of family 1, and an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance of family 2 (Fig. 1). All 12 living affected individuals with PPK as well as 6 unaffected (healthy) individuals including parents and siblings from both families (Family 1 and 2) were investigated. The seven affected individuals from family 1:IV:7, IV:8, IV:12, V:2, V:4, V:8 and V:9 were 27, 22, 45, 16, 11, 15 and 13 years of age respectively at the time of examination, while the five affected individuals from family 2: III:2, III:5, III:6, IV:1 and IV:2 were 28, 36, 40, 12 and 8 years of age respectively. On the basis of basic clinical dermatological examination, PPK was the main finding exhibit in all patients (affected members) of the recruited families.
Fig. 1

SLURP1 Chr8(GRCh37):g.143823760C > T; c.44C > T; p.Trp15 (Family 1). DSG1 Chr18(GRCh37):g.28906885C > T; c.133C > T; p.Arg45* (Family 2). a, e Simplified pedigrees of the extended Pakistani families investigated with genotypes of affected and unaffected ndividuals. b Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of SLURP1 c.44 C > T in a heterozygous healthy carrier and homozygous affected individual. c-d Palmoplantar keratoderma in an individual homozygous for SLURP1 c.44 C > T. f Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of DSG1 c.133C > T in a wild type control and heterozygous affected individual. g-h Palmoplantar Keratoderma in an individual heterozygous for DSG1 c.133C > T

SLURP1 Chr8(GRCh37):g.143823760C > T; c.44C > T; p.Trp15 (Family 1). DSG1 Chr18(GRCh37):g.28906885C > T; c.133C > T; p.Arg45* (Family 2). a, e Simplified pedigrees of the extended Pakistani families investigated with genotypes of affected and unaffected ndividuals. b Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of SLURP1 c.44 C > T in a heterozygous healthy carrier and homozygous affected individual. c-d Palmoplantar keratoderma in an individual homozygous for SLURP1 c.44 C > T. f Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of DSG1 c.133C > T in a wild type control and heterozygous affected individual. g-h Palmoplantar Keratoderma in an individual heterozygous for DSG1 c.133C > T Disease onset was from 3 months to 1 year. Affected individuals of family 1 show cuff-like pattern with well demarcated margins and waxy yellow tone on hands and feet. Diffuse hyperkeratosis of hand and feet was common in patients. Fingers were tapered towards the tips and flexion deformity due to contractures was observed in 2 (IV:7 and IV:8) patients. Knuckle pads were observed in interphalangeal joints and hyperhidrosis was also common in all patients. Patients in family 2 showed diffuse hyperkeratosis with cracks and fissuring of the volar surface of the digits of hands and soles, toes were observed in two siblings. All other patients have mild hyperkeratosis. Mild to severe deafness was observed in patients and one patient (III:5) was deaf as well as mute. Both families’ phenotypes are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
Table 1

Clinical phenotypes of study participants of family 1 and 2

Family 1Family 2
IndividualsIV:7IV:8IV:12V:2V:4V:8V:9III:2III:5III:6IV:1IV:2
Age27 years22 years45 Years16 years11 years15 years13 years28 years36 years40 years12 years8 years
SexFFFMMFFMFFFF
Disease onset1 year1 year6 months6 months1 year3 months6 monthsBy birthBy birthBy birthBy birthBy birth
InheritanceAutosomal RecessiveAutosomal Dominant
Diffuse PPK++++++++++++
Scale colourYellowishYellowishYellowishYellowishYellowishYellowishYellowish
Cuff like margins++++++++++++++
Pseudoainhum
Cracked Hypekeratosis++++++++
DeafnessMildCompleteMildMildMild
Speech abnormalityMildComplete
Diffuse hyperkeratosisSevereSevereMildMildMild

Teeth, hairs and

nails

NormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Finger deformity+++++++
Hyperhidrosis+++++++
Cardiomyopathy

+ = presence of feature, − -absence of feature, +++ = present in severe form

Clinical phenotypes of study participants of family 1 and 2 Teeth, hairs and nails + = presence of feature, − -absence of feature, +++ = present in severe form All patients of family 1 and 2 were intellectually normal and hair, nail, teeth and cardiac anomalies were not observed in any of the patient. Disease conditions worsened due to aging.

Genetic findings

To identify the causative gene mutation, single affected individual from each of the family was initially selected to perform WES (subject IV:12 of family 1 and III:2 of family 2, Fig. 1) to generate a profile of rare and novel sequence variants, with regard to mode of inheritance in each of the families. After that, exome data was first reviewed to identify pathogenic variants in disease associated genes, filtering for highly likely deleterious (nonsense, frame-shift, non-synonymous exonic or splice-site) variants for comparison with allele frequencies in online genome databases (including the Exome Aggregation Consortium; ExAC, the 1000 Genomes Project and the Genome Aggregation Database; gnomAD). This identified a single candidate novel homozygous nonsense variant [NM_020427.2:c.44G > A; Chr8:143823760C > T (GRCh37)] in the first coding exon of SLURP1 gene (Fig. 1) in family 1. This variant leads to substitution of tryptophan by a premature termination codon and is at the evolutionary conserved position 15 (p.Trp15*). In family 2, a heterozygous variant [NM_001942.3:c.133C > T; Chr18:28906885C > T (GRCh37)] was identified in coding exon 3 of the DSG1 gene (Fig. 1), which is predicted to result in a premature stop codon (p.Arg45*). The SLURP1 gene variant in family 1 is not listed in online genome databases and segregates as predicted for an autosomal recessive form in family 1. The DSG1 gene variant identified of family 2 is listed in the gnomAD browser database in 1 Latino individual in heterozygous form out of 31,370 genomes, corresponding to a minor allele frequency of 0.00003188; both variants are summarized in Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2 alongside all other reported disease-associated SLURP1 and DSG1 variants.

Discussion

SLURP1 has been localized to the granular layer of epidermis [16], where it functions as part of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors found on keratinocyte cells as a pro-apoptotic protein [17]. Arredondo et al. [17] demonstrated that keratinocytes are stimulated by SLURP1 through nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, leading to decline in keratinocytes cell number, indicative of the inhibitory and regulatory nature of SLURP1. Therefore, when SLURP1 is non-functional, as seen in Mal de Meleda, severe hyperkeratosis results due to improper keratinocyte apoptosis regulation [8, 18]. We identified nonsense variant in family 1 which causes substitution of evolutionarily conserved tryptophan at 15th amino acid position in SLURP1 by a premature termination codon. Nonsense variant (c.129C > A; p.Cys43*) is also reported in exon 2 of SLURP1 gene in a Turkish family. Similarly another nonsense mutation (c.286C > T; p.Arg96*) is also found in exon 3 in Croatian family and is predicted to truncate protein synthesis via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay [19, 20]. Family reported in this study have same clinical features to previously reported Mal de Meleda families. The SLURP1 gene mutation p.Gly86Arg is most often found in sporadic patients with MDM of Asian origin [21, 22]. So far 20 mutations in SLURP1 are reported to cause Mal de Meleda, a form of PPK (Additional file 1: Table S1,). c.44G > A; p.Trp15Term is the second variant identified in Pakistan apart from c.2 T > C, p.Met1Thr variant which was recently reported [23]. “Desmoglein” comprises of the two Greek words “desmos” for “tie” and “glein” for “glue-like.” Perturbations of desmoglein expression in the epidermis have been known to impact cell adhesion properties. DSG1 is distinctively located, just above the stratum germinativum, to be candidate of epidermis stratification and differentiation [24]. A study in which DSG1 was down regulated in skin culture confirmed the importance of DSG1 for directing those functions [25]. In all reported PPKs cases where DSG1 gene variants (frameshift or nonsense) have been reported, there is evidence that affected protein haploinsufficiency leads to the striate, focal PPK and striate PPK with wooly hair and cardiomyopathy. Haploinsufficiency is predicted to cause through nonsense mediated mRNA decay because of premature termination codons [26, 27]. Interestingly, a heterozygous DSG1 mutation has also been reported in focal PPK [13]. To date, 31 mutations (8 nonsense mutations, 14 frame-shift variants and 9 splice-site variants) in DSG1 have been reported to cause striate/focal PPK (Additional file 1: Table S2). In 2009, Dua-Awereh et al. reported five heterozygous variants (p.Arg26*; c.373-2A > G; c.515C > T; c.1266-3C > G and c.1399delA) in DSG1 gene in five families with autosomal dominant striate PPK [28]. Thus, c.133C > T; p.Arg45* variant identified in this study is the sixth mutation underlying dominantly inherited form of striate PPK in Pakistan. MDM presented a consistently severe phenotype than Nagashima form of PPK. MDM shows progressive hyperkeratosis among all PPKs and causes flexion contracture and constricting band [29]. While, Nagashima PPK is characterized by non-progressive and mild hyperkeratosis and does not show flexion contracture and constricting band [30, 31]. Nagashima PPK is caused by biallelic loss of function mutation in SERPINB7 while, MDM is caused by SLURP1 gene mutation [20]. Therefore, MDM is genetically distinct from Nagashima PPK [32]. PPKs are diagnosed on the basis of differential diagnosis to find out the disease entity. Differential diagnosis of PPK is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Differential diagnosis of PPKs

NameDisease TypeClinical FeaturesHistopathologyGene
Mal de Meleda Diffuse PPK

1. Soon after birth

2.Severe diffuse yellow and waxy thick hyperkeratosis in a ‘glove-and-socks’ distribution

3.Sharp demarcation

4. Autosomal Recessive

1.Nonepidermolytic pattern

2.Increased stratum lucidum

3.Prominent perivascular inflammatory infiltrate

SLURP1
Unna-Thost

1.Soon after birth to early childhood

2.Diffuse yellowish thick hyperkeratosis with sharp demarcation at the volar border

3. Autosomal Dominant

1.Epidermolytic pattern

(perinuclear vacuolization and granular degeneration of keratinocytes in the spinous and granular layer)

KRT1, KRT9
Greither Disease

1.Soon after birth to childhood/adolescence

2. Diffuse red/yellow moderate to severe hyperkeratosis

3. Autosomal Dominant

1.Epidermolytic pattern KRT1
Nagashima PPK

1.Mostly within infancy

2. Diffuse mild reddish hyperkeratosis, red rim; white spongy appearance after water exposure

3. Autosomal Dominant

1.Nonepidermolytic pattern SERPINB7
Striate PPK
Striate Type I PPK Focal PPK

1.Childhood to adolescence

2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar surface of the fingers

2.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles

3.Autosomal Dominant

1.Hyperkeratosis

2. Widening of intercellular spaces in the spinous and granular layer

DSG1
Striate Type II PPK

1.Childhood to early adulthood

2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar aspect of fingers

3.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles

4. Autosomal Dominant

1.Hyperkeratosis

2.Widening of intercellular paces and

condensation of the keratin filament network in suprabasal cell layers

DSP
Punctate PPK
Punctate PPK Type IA Focal PPK

1.Late childhood to adulthood

2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation

3.Worsening of papules upon exposure to water

4. Autosomal Dominant

1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis

with central epidermal depression

AAGAB
Punctate PPK Type IB

1.Late childhood to adulthood

2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation

3. Autosomal Dominant

1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis

with central epidermal depression

COL14A1
Punctate PPK Type II

1.Puberty to early adulthood

2.Multiple spiny keratosispits with keratotic plugs (late onset)

4. Autosomal Dominant

1. Columns of parakeratotic corneocytes (cornoid lamellae)

2.Superficial epidermal depression where the granular layer is reduced or absent

Unknown
Punctate PPK Type III

1.Adolescence to adulthood

2.Translucent hyperkeratotic papules, sometimes umbilicated, on lateral aspects of palms and soles

3. Autosomal Dominant

1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis

2.Decreased number of fragmented elastic fibres

Unknown

PPK, Palmoplantar keratoderma; SLURP1, Secreted lymphocyte antigen 6 (LY6)/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-related protein-1; KRT, Keratin;SERPIN7, serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7; DSG1, Desmoglein1; DSP, Desmoplakin;AAGAB, Alpha- and gamma-adaptin-binding protein p34;COL14A1, Collagen XIV

Differential diagnosis of PPKs 1. Soon after birth 2.Severe diffuse yellow and waxy thick hyperkeratosis in a ‘glove-and-socks’ distribution 3.Sharp demarcation 4. Autosomal Recessive 1.Nonepidermolytic pattern 2.Increased stratum lucidum 3.Prominent perivascular inflammatory infiltrate 1.Soon after birth to early childhood 2.Diffuse yellowish thick hyperkeratosis with sharp demarcation at the volar border 3. Autosomal Dominant 1.Epidermolytic pattern (perinuclear vacuolization and granular degeneration of keratinocytes in the spinous and granular layer) 1.Soon after birth to childhood/adolescence 2. Diffuse red/yellow moderate to severe hyperkeratosis 3. Autosomal Dominant 1.Mostly within infancy 2. Diffuse mild reddish hyperkeratosis, red rim; white spongy appearance after water exposure 3. Autosomal Dominant 1.Childhood to adolescence 2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar surface of the fingers 2.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles 3.Autosomal Dominant 1.Hyperkeratosis 2. Widening of intercellular spaces in the spinous and granular layer 1.Childhood to early adulthood 2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar aspect of fingers 3.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles 4. Autosomal Dominant 1.Hyperkeratosis 2.Widening of intercellular paces and condensation of the keratin filament network in suprabasal cell layers 1.Late childhood to adulthood 2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation 3.Worsening of papules upon exposure to water 4. Autosomal Dominant 1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis with central epidermal depression 1.Late childhood to adulthood 2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation 3. Autosomal Dominant 1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis with central epidermal depression 1.Puberty to early adulthood 2.Multiple spiny keratosispits with keratotic plugs (late onset) 4. Autosomal Dominant 1. Columns of parakeratotic corneocytes (cornoid lamellae) 2.Superficial epidermal depression where the granular layer is reduced or absent 1.Adolescence to adulthood 2.Translucent hyperkeratotic papules, sometimes umbilicated, on lateral aspects of palms and soles 3. Autosomal Dominant 1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis 2.Decreased number of fragmented elastic fibres PPK, Palmoplantar keratoderma; SLURP1, Secreted lymphocyte antigen 6 (LY6)/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-related protein-1; KRT, Keratin;SERPIN7, serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7; DSG1, Desmoglein1; DSP, Desmoplakin;AAGAB, Alpha- and gamma-adaptin-binding protein p34;COL14A1, Collagen XIV

Conclusion

The identification of a novel homozygous nonsense variant in SLURP1, and a novel heterozygous nonsense variant in DSG1, as likely causes of PPK in the Pakistani families investigated alongside a review of previously reported variants adds to knowledge of the molecular causes of these conditions. Additionally, the data here provides important information regarding the nature, spectrum and molecular basis of PPK in Pakistan, enabling early clinical intervention, increased awareness regarding inherited disorders present in a community, and aiding diagnosis and counselling. Table S1. List of candidate pathogenic variants in SLURP1 gene previously reported in association with Mal de Meleda. Table S2. List of candidate pathogenic variants in DSG1 gene previously reported to be associated with Palmoplantar Keratoderma. (DOCX 66 kb)
  29 in total

1.  Mutations in SERPINB7, encoding a member of the serine protease inhibitor superfamily, cause Nagashima-type palmoplantar keratosis.

Authors:  Akiharu Kubo; Aiko Shiohama; Takashi Sasaki; Kazuhiko Nakabayashi; Hiroshi Kawasaki; Toru Atsugi; Showbu Sato; Atsushi Shimizu; Shuji Mikami; Hideaki Tanizaki; Masaki Uchiyama; Tatsuo Maeda; Taisuke Ito; Jun-ichi Sakabe; Toshio Heike; Torayuki Okuyama; Rika Kosaki; Kenjiro Kosaki; Jun Kudoh; Kenichiro Hata; Akihiro Umezawa; Yoshiki Tokura; Akira Ishiko; Hironori Niizeki; Kenji Kabashima; Yoshihiko Mitsuhashi; Masayuki Amagai
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Mal de Meleda in Indonesia: Mutations in the SLURP1 gene appear to be ubiquitous.

Authors:  Jessica A Taylor; Davide Bondavalli; Mastura Monif; Lee Mei Yap; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.875

3.  First Mal de Meleda report in Chinese Mainland: two families with a recurrent homozygous missense mutation in SLURP-1.

Authors:  J Zhang; R Cheng; C Ni; J Liang; M Li; Z Yao
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  A novel homozygous mutation disrupting the initiation codon in the SLURP1 gene underlies mal de Meleda in a consanguineous family.

Authors:  K Shah; A Nasir; S Shahzad; S Khan; W Ahmad
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.470

5.  SLURP1 is a late marker of epidermal differentiation and is absent in Mal de Meleda.

Authors:  Bertrand Favre; Laure Plantard; Lorène Aeschbach; Noureddine Brakch; Stephanie Christen-Zaech; Pierre A de Viragh; Ann Sergeant; Marcel Huber; Daniel Hohl
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma "clinical and genetic differential diagnosis".

Authors:  Tomo Sakiyama; Akiharu Kubo
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.005

Review 7.  Hereditary palmoplantar keratodermas. Part I. Non-syndromic palmoplantar keratodermas: classification, clinical and genetic features.

Authors:  L Guerra; M Castori; B Didona; D Castiglia; G Zambruno
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  Palmoplantar keratodermas: clinical and genetic aspects.

Authors:  Cristina Has; Kristin Technau-Hafsi
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.584

9.  Mutations in desmoglein 1 cause diverse inherited palmoplantar keratoderma phenotypes: implications for genetic screening.

Authors:  M-L Lovgren; M A McAleer; A D Irvine; N J Wilson; S Tavadia; M E Schwartz; C Cole; A Sandilands; F J D Smith; M Zamiri
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Focal palmoplantar keratoderma caused by an autosomal dominant inherited mutation in the desmoglein 1 gene.

Authors:  M Milingou; P Wood; I Masouyé; W H McLean; L Borradori
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.366

View more
  3 in total

1.  General gene expression patterns and stemness of the gingiva and dental pulp.

Authors:  Ko Eun Lee; Chung-Min Kang; Mijeong Jeon; Seong-Oh Kim; Jae-Ho Lee; Hyung-Jun Choi
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 2.  Diagnosis and Management of Inherited Palmoplantar Keratodermas.

Authors:  Bjorn R Thomas; Edel A O'Toole
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Differential Pathomechanisms of Desmoglein 1 Transmembrane Domain Mutations in Skin Disease.

Authors:  Stephanie E Zimmer; Takuya Takeichi; Daniel E Conway; Akiharu Kubo; Yasushi Suga; Masashi Akiyama; Andrew P Kowalczyk
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.590

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.