BACKGROUND: Mechanical quantitative sensory testing (QST) assesses sensory functioning and detects functional changes in (central) nociceptive processing. It has been hypothesized that these functional changes might be apparent in people with nonspecific low back pain (LBP), although the results are mixed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to examine whether sensory function, measured with QST, was altered in people with nonspecific LBP. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched for relevant literature. Studies comparing mechanical QST measures involving people with subacute and chronic LBP and healthy controls were included if (1) pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), (2) temporal summation, or (3) conditioned pain modulation were reported. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. When possible, the results from different studies were pooled. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included. Scores on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale varied between 1 and 6 points. People with nonspecific LBP, compared to healthy controls, had significantly lower PPTs at remote sites and increased temporal summation at the lower back. The PPTs measured at the scapula were significantly lower in patients with nonspecific LBP than in healthy controls (pooled mean difference, 119.2 kPa; 95% confidence interval: 91.8, 146.6 kPa; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The PPT measurements at remote body parts were significantly lower in people with nonspecific LBP compared with healthy controls. Temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation measurements had mixed outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 3a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(10):698-715. Epub 23 Aug 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8876.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical quantitative sensory testing (QST) assesses sensory functioning and detects functional changes in (central) nociceptive processing. It has been hypothesized that these functional changes might be apparent in people with nonspecific low back pain (LBP), although the results are mixed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to examine whether sensory function, measured with QST, was altered in people with nonspecific LBP. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched for relevant literature. Studies comparing mechanical QST measures involving people with subacute and chronic LBP and healthy controls were included if (1) pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), (2) temporal summation, or (3) conditioned pain modulation were reported. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. When possible, the results from different studies were pooled. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included. Scores on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale varied between 1 and 6 points. People with nonspecific LBP, compared to healthy controls, had significantly lower PPTs at remote sites and increased temporal summation at the lower back. The PPTs measured at the scapula were significantly lower in patients with nonspecific LBP than in healthy controls (pooled mean difference, 119.2 kPa; 95% confidence interval: 91.8, 146.6 kPa; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The PPT measurements at remote body parts were significantly lower in people with nonspecific LBP compared with healthy controls. Temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation measurements had mixed outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 3a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(10):698-715. Epub 23 Aug 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8876.
Entities:
Keywords:
central sensitization; conditioned pain modulation; low back pain; pressure pain threshold; temporal summation
Authors: Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Angela Starkweather; Kathryn Ward; Bright Eze; Ahleah Gavin; Cynthia L Renn; Susan G Dorsey Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Paulo E P Teixeira; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Elif Uygur-Kucukseymen; Roberto Mathias Machado; Ana Balbuena-Pareja; Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Maria Alejandra Luna-Cuadros; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Paola Gonzalez-Mego; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Timothy Wagner; Laura Dipietro; Felipe Fregni Journal: Pain Med Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.637
Authors: Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Lynn Leemans; Ömer Elma; Jo Nijs; Timothy H Wideman; Carolie Siffain; Hester den Bandt; Sven Van Laere; David Beckwée Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.377