| Literature DB >> 31443579 |
Biagina Chiofalo1, Esterina Fazio2, Salvatore Cucinotta2, Cristina Cravana2.
Abstract
Nutrition plays a leading role that most influences thyroid response and energetic metabolism. Aim was to compare the effect of diet on thyroid and lipid status in guide dogs during a 12-weeks training period. Eight Labrador Retrievers were divided into two groups homogeneous for sex, age, body weight, and Body Condition Score (BCS) and fed two commercial diets one, HPF, characterized by low-carbohydrate/high-protein/high-fat (29%:39%:19% as-fed) and the other, LPF, by high-carbohydrate/low-protein/low-fat (50%:24%:12% as-fed) content. The serum thriiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), cholesterol (CHOL), triglycerides (TAGs) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were determined at Day 0, 28, 56, and 84, before the daily training. Statistical model included the effects of Diet (HPF vs. LPF) and Time (Day 0 to Day 84), and their interaction. In the HPF group, Diet significantly (p < 0.01) increased T4, CHOL, and TAGs and decreased NEFA. In both groups, Time significantly (p < 0.05) increased T4 and TAGs, CHOL at Day 28, and NEFA at Day 56. The interaction did not influence serum hormones and lipid pattern. The adjustments in thyroid and lipid responses to moderate exercise in HPF group were driven mainly by the nutrient composition of the diet in relation to the involvement of metabolic homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: dietary protein/fat ratio; guide dog; lipid panel; thyroid hormones; training
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443579 PMCID: PMC6769750 DOI: 10.3390/ani9090597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical composition and metabolizable energy of the diets 1.
| Diet 2 | Anonymous 3 | HPF 4 | LPF 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture, g/100g as-fed | 9.0 | 5.42 | 0.48 | 6.12 | 0.57 |
| CP, g/100g as-fed | 26 | 39.24 | 0.84 | 24.40 | 0.32 |
| Fat, g/100g as-fed | 15.50 | 18.69 | 0.51 | 11.78 | 0.29 |
| OM, g/100g as-fed | ND | 86.83 | 0.27 | 86.50 | 1.20 |
| TDF, g/100g as-fed | 2.80 | 11.59 | 1.13 | 13.03 | 1.46 |
| Ash, g/100g as-fed | 4.9 | 7.91 | 0.23 | 7.51 | 0.55 |
| ME 3, kcal/kg as-fed | 3900 | 4330 | - | 3423 | - |
CP = Crude Protein; OM = Organic Matter; TDF = Total Dietary Fibre; ME = Metabolizable Energy. ND = Not Determined; 1 Values are means ± standard deviation; 2 Anonymous was the normal maintenance diet usually used in the Centre along training work; HPF was the “performance” diet with low-carbohydrate/high-protein/high-fat diet and LPF was the “normal maintenance” diet with high-carbohydrate/low-protein/low-fat diet administered during the trial; 3 Values reported on the label; 4 Values determined analytically.
Effect of the diets on BW and BCS of the trial 1.
| Items | Groups 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPF | SEM | LPF | SEM | ||
| BW, kg | 25.40 a | 0.21 | 23.44 b | 0.26 | <0.001 |
| BCS, score 1–9 | 4.64 a | 0.12 | 4.01 b | 0.15 | 0.003 |
BW = Body weight; BCS = Body Condition Score; 1 Values are means (LSM) ± standard error of the mean (SEM); 2 HPF = low-carbohydrate/ high-protein and fat diet; LPF = high-carbohydrate/low-protein and fat diet; 3 Probability values for the effects of Diet; a, b Within a row, means with different superscript letter were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effect of the diet on serum hormonal and lipid panel concentrations for the whole trial period 1.
| Items | Groups 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPF | SEM | LPF | SEM | ||
| T3 (nmol/L) | 2.64 | 0.83 | 2.48 | 0.83 | 0.617 |
| T4 (nmol/L) | 33.19 a | 1.12 | 29.10 b | 1.17 | 0.003 |
| CHOL (mg/dL) | 175.82 a | 3.34 | 141.43 b | 4.98 | 0.001 |
| TAGs (mg/dL) | 53.98 a | 2.33 | 42.06 b | 2.44 | 0.006 |
| NEFA (mg/dL) | 0.50 b | 0.04 | 0.64 a | 0.04 | <0.001 |
T3 = Thriiodothyronine; T4 = Thyroxine; CHOL= Cholesterol; TAGs= Tryglicerides; NEFA= Non Esterificated Fatty Acids; 1 Values are means (LSM) ± standard error of the mean (SEM); 2 HPF = low-carbohydrate/high-protein and fat diet; LPF = high-carbohydrate/low-protein and fat diet; 3 Probability values for the effects of Diet; a, b Within a row, means with different superscript letter were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Profile of serum hormonal and lipid panel concentrations during the trial 1.
| Groups 2 | Time 3 | SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 28 | 56 | 84 | Diet | Time | D × T | |||
| T3 (nmol/L) | HPF | 2.58 | 2.69 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 0.39 | 0.617 | 0.963 | 0.872 |
| LPF | 2.42 | 2.54 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 0.38 | ||||
| T4 (nmol/L) | HPF | 32.06 a | 28.69 b | 36.44 a,x | 34.30 a,x | 1.19 | 0.003 | 0.023 | 0.274 |
| LPF | 33.91 a | 27.77 b | 29.23 b,y | 29.47 b,y | 1.16 | ||||
| CHOL (mg/dL) | HPF | 172.60 b | 182.40 a | 168.00 b,x | 180.60 a,x | 3.82 | 0.001 | 0.031 | 0.449 |
| LPF | 161.50 b | 176.50 a | 131.50 by | 154.00 b,y | 4.54 | ||||
| TAGs (mg/dL) | HPF | 64.30 a | 60.30 a,x | 42.33 b | 48.00 b | 2.12 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.373 |
| LPF | 54.00 a | 46.00 a,b,y | 42.00 b | 32.00 b | 2.34 | ||||
| NEFA (mg/dL) | HPF | 0.26 b | 0.54 b,y | 0.70 b | 0.53 b,y | 0.03 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.126 |
| LPF | 0.36 b | 0.62 b,x | 0.82 b | 0.74 a,x | 0.03 | ||||
T3 = Thriiodothyronine; T4 = Thyroxine; CHOL= Cholesterol; TAGs= Tryglicerides; NEFA= non-esterified fatty acids. 1 Values are means (LSM) ± standard error of the mean (SEM); 2 HPF = low-carbohydrate/ high-protein and fat diet; LPF = high-carbohydrate/low-protein and fat diet; 3 Blood sampling at Day 0, Day 28, Day 56, and Day 84, before the exercise; 4 Probability values for the effects of Diet, Time, and Diet × Time; a,b Within row, means with different superscripts letter were significantly different (p < 0.05) due to time; x,y Within column, means with different superscript letter were significantly different (p < 0.05) due to diet.