| Literature DB >> 31443487 |
Jassada Saingamsook1,2, Jintana Yanola3, Nongkran Lumjuan4, Catherine Walton5, Pradya Somboon6.
Abstract
Knockdown resistance (kdr) and detoxification enzymes are major resistance mechanisms in insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti throughout the world. Persistence of the resistance phenotype is associated with high fitness of resistance alleles in the absence of insecticide pressure. This study determined the relative fitness cost of three insecticide-resistant strains of Aedes aegypti-PMD, PMD-R, and UPK-R-and a hybrid under similar laboratory conditions in the absence of insecticide. The PMD strain is resistant to DDT with no kdr alleles; the PMD-R is resistant to DDT and permethrin with 1534C homozygous kdr alleles; and UPK-R is resistant to DDT, permethrin, and deltamethrin with 989P + 1016G homozygous alleles. The DDT-resistant PMD strain had the highest fitness compared with the two DDT/pyrethroid-resistant strains (PMD-R and UPK-R) and hybrid. Consistent fitness costs were observed in the DDT/pyrethroid-resistant strains and hybrid, including shorter wing length, reduced egg hatchability, shorter female lifespan, and shorter viability of eggs after storage, whereas no effect was observed on blood feeding rate. In addition, reduced egg production was observed in the PMD-R strain and prolonged developmental time was seen in the UPK-R strain. The corresponding hybrid that is heterozygous for kdr alleles was fitter than either of the homozygous mutant genotypes. This is in accordance with the high frequency of heterozygous genotypes observed in natural populations of Ae. aegypti in Chiang Mai city.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; fitness; insecticide resistance; kdr
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443487 PMCID: PMC6780153 DOI: 10.3390/insects10090265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Comparison of life-trait parameters of PMD, PMD-R, and UPK-R strains and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid.
| Parameter | Strain (Mean ± SE) * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMD | PMD-R | UPK-R | Hybrid | |
| Pupation time (day) 1 | 11.6 ± 0.1 a | 11.5 ± 0.1 a | 12.6 ± 0.1 b | 11.8 ± 0.1 a |
| Pupation rate (%) 2 | 89.5 ± 4.0 a | 85.0 ± 2.5 a | 89.0 ± 1.3 a | 95.0 ± 1.7 a |
| Adult emergence time (day) 3 | 14.9 ± 0.1 a | 14.6 ± 0.1 a | 15.8 ± 0.1 b | 14.9 ± 0.1 a |
| Adult emergence rate (%) 4 | 89.0 ± 3.8 a | 85.0 ± 2.5 a | 87.5 ± 1.0 a | 95.0 ± 1.7 a |
| Wing length (mm) | 3.29 ± 0.02 a | 2.98 ± 0.03 b | 3.14 ± 0.02 c | 3.08 ± 0.01 c |
| Eggs/female (egg) | 94.8 ± 2.6 a | 74.7 ± 3.8 b | 91.9 ± 1.7 a | 87.4 ± 1.6 a |
| Eggs hatching rate (%) | 96.0 ± 0.6 a | 84.7 ± 0.3 b | 84.7 ± 0.3 b | 80.7 ± 0.9 c |
* Values indicate mean and standard error. The same superscript letters in each row indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05, ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test). 1 Duration of L1 larvae developing to pupae. 2 Percent of larvae developing to pupae. 3 Duration of L1 larvae developing to adults. 4 Percent of larvae developing to adults.
Figure 1Development time of larvae to pupae of PMD, PMD-R, UPK-R strains, and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid. The cumulative mean percentage of pupae formation and standard error are indicated.
Blood feeding capacity of the PMD, PMD-R, UPK-R, and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid.
| Parameter | PMD | PMD-R | UPK-R | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood feeding rate (%) | 94.0 ± 0.6 a | 93.0 ± 0.6 a | 95.0 ± 1.2 a | 95.7 ± 0.3 a |
| No. of pool 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Before blood meal (mg) 2 | 12.58 ± 0.23 a | 9.90 ± 0.61 b | 10.75 ± 0.12 b | 11.54 ± 0.31 a |
| After blood meal (mg) 2 | 27.55 ± 0.45 a | 20.37 ± 0.73 b | 22.18 ± 0.28 b,c | 23.83 ± 0.43 c |
| Weight of blood ingested (mg) 2 | 14.97 ± 0.25 a | 10.47 ± 0.76 b | 11.43 ± 0.31 b | 12.29 ± 0.43 b |
| Weight increase ratio | 2.19 ± 0.02 a | 2.09 ± 0.13 a | 2.07 ± 0.03 a | 2.07 ± 0.06 a |
Values indicate mean and standard error. The same superscript letters in each row indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05, ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test). 1 Five females in each pool. 2 Average per pool.
Figure 2Egg hatching rates of PMD, PMD-R, UPK-R, and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid. Mean and standard deviation are indicated.
Figure 3Survival curves of males (a) and females (b) of PMD, PMD-R, and UPK-R strains, and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid under laboratory conditions.
Summary of relative fitness cost on life-trait parameters of the pyrethroid-resistant PMD-R and UPK-R strains and F1 (PMD-R × UPK-R) hybrid compared with the pyrethroid-susceptible PMD strain.
| Life-Trait Parameter | PMD-R | UPK-R | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developmental time (larval to adult) | equal | longer | equal |
| Wing length | shorter | shorter | shorter |
| Blood feeding rate | equal | equal | equal |
| Blood ingestion volume | smaller | smaller | equal |
| Eggs/female | lower | equal | equal |
| Egg hatchability | lower | lower | lower |
| Egg viability duration | shorter | shorter | shorter |
| Adult longevity | shorter | shorter | shorter |
Figure 4Cumulative adult emergence from the first appearance until the last emergence of PMD-R and UPK-R strains when they were reared together under limited space and food. The percentages of emerging adults are indicated above each bar.
Frequencies of V1016G and F1534C alleles in F1 adult progeny reared from eggs obtained from cages containing equal pairs of males and females of PMD-R and UPK-R strains.
| No. of Mosquito (%) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cage | |||
| A | B | ||
| 1016V/V + 1534C/C | 5 (16.7) | 4 (13.4) | 9 (15.0) |
| 1016G/G + 1534F/F | 10 (33.3) | 13 (43.3) | 23 (38.3) |
| 1016V/G + 1534F/C | 15 (50.0) | 13 (43.3) | 28 (46.7) |
| Total | 30 (100.0) | 30 (100.0) | 60 (100.0) |