| Literature DB >> 31443473 |
Shazia Mansoor1, Pierre P D Kondiah1, Yahya E Choonara1, Viness Pillay2.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic illness estimated to have affected 451 million individuals to date, with this number expected to significantly rise in the coming years. There are two main classes of this disease, namely type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Insulin therapy is pivotal in the management of diabetes, with diabetic individuals taking multiple daily insulin injections. However, the mode of administration has numerous drawbacks, resulting in poor patient compliance. In order to optimize insulin therapy, novel drug delivery systems (DDSes) have been suggested, and alternative routes of administration have been investigated. A novel aspect in the field of drug delivery was brought about by the coalescence of polymeric science and nanotechnology. In addition to polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), insulin DDSes can incorporate the use of nanoplatforms/carriers. A combination of these systems can bring about novel formulations and lead to significant improvements in the drug delivery system (DDS) with regard to therapeutic efficacy, bioavailability, increased half-life, improved transport through physical and chemical barriers, and controlled drug delivery. This review will discuss how recent developments in polymer chemistry and nanotechnology have been employed in a multitude of platforms as well as in administration routes for the safe and efficient delivery of insulin for the treatment of DM.Entities:
Keywords: bioavailability; biodegradable platforms; insulin; nanotechnology; polymeric delivery systems
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443473 PMCID: PMC6780129 DOI: 10.3390/polym11091380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Summary of natural and synthetic polymers, their advantages, polymeric complexes, delivery systems, and alternative routes of administration employed in nano-insulin delivery. NPs: nanoparticles.
| Polymer | Advantages | Polymeric Complex and Delivery System | Route of Administration |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| CS |
Abundant in nature Mucoadhesive Biodegradable Nontoxic Inexpensive |
Trimethyl chitosan (TMC) NPs [ Chitosan (CS)/reduced gold (Au) nanoparticles (NPs) [ CS-g-polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether (mPEG) NP nanocomplex [ CS polyelectrolyte (PEC) NPs [ CS NPs [ |
Oral [ Nasal [ |
| Alginate |
Derived from nature Polyanionic Biodegradable Nontoxic Mucoadhesive Low immunogenicity Able to form a gel at acidic pH or if divalent cations are present |
Alginate/CS/β-cyclodextran NPs [ Alginate/CS PEC NPs [ Alginate/CS-coated NPs [ Calcium phosphate-coated alginate/CS/Vitamin B12 (VB12) NPs [ |
Oral [ |
| HA |
Biocompatible Biodegradable Low immunogenicity |
Hyaluronic Acid (HA)-coated calcium carbonate NPs [ HA NPs [ |
Oral [ |
| Dextran |
Biodegradable Biocompatible Hydrophilic OH functional groups allow for a variety of manipulations |
Dextran/alginate sulfate NPs with CS/albumin coating [ Dextran/ Poly-Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) NPs [ VB12/intrinsic factor conjugates on dextran NPs [ |
Oral [ |
| Gelatin |
Biodegradable Nontoxic Hydrophilic Polyampholyte Crosslinking potential |
Gelatin/glutaraldehyde NPs [ Gelatin/poloxamer NPs [ |
Oral [ Pulmonary [ |
|
| |||
| PLGA |
Biodegradable Controlled release kinetics |
Zinc insulin in PLGA NPs [ PLGA NPs [ PLGA-conjugated CS NPs [ PLGA NPs within polyvinyl alcohol PVA hydrogel [ |
Oral [ Intraperitoneal injection [ |
| PCL |
Biodegradable Degrade over a period of time Mucoadhesive |
Poly-ε-Caprolactone (PCL) NPs [ PCL-blended cationic acrylic NPs [ mPEG/PCL/ |
Oral [ |
| PVA |
Biocompatible Biodegradable Low toxicity Thermal stability High level of mechanical strength Blended (natural polymers) |
PVA/CS nano-insulin-loaded hydrogels [ PVA NPs [ |
Transdermal [ Oral [ |
| Polyamino Acids |
Chirality Reversible crosslinking Hydrophilic Hydrophobic Charge density |
CS/poly-g-glutamic acid NPs [ Gelatin-coated CS/poly (γ-glutamic acid) NPs [ L valine/PBA NPs [ |
Oral [ |
| Pluronic |
Biodegradable Amphiphilic Thermosensitive properties Soluble in aqueous, polar, and nonpolar solvents |
Poly lactic acid (PLA)/pluronic/PLA NPs [ Folic acid/pluronic/PLGA NPs [ |
Oral [ |
Figure 1Biodegradable polymers employed in the delivery of nano-insulin formulations.
Figure 2(a) Schematic process of fabricating ConA microspheres via w/o emulsion-based crosslinking, (b) preparation of the chitosan-based scaffolds for insulin delivery, and (c) chemical structures of dextran glycidyl methacrylate (Dex-GMA), concanavalin-A (ConA), chitosan, and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) (reproduced with permission from Reference [49]).
Figure 3Schematic illustrating the fabrication of alginate-dextran NPs via a w/o nanoemulsion technique (reproduced with permission from Reference [23]).
Figure 4(a) Schematic illustrating the mechanism of layer-by-layer insulin nanoparticle capsules and (b) illustrating the nanosphere, nanocapsules, dendrimers, SLNs, transfersomes, and nanogel platforms for insulin loading and delivery (adapted with permission from Reference [81]).
Summary of advantages and challenges associated with polymeric nanoplatforms for various insulin delivery approaches.
| Delivery Approach | Advantages | Challenges | Polymeric Systems | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oral |
Improved patient compliance Closely mimics physiological insulin route Good glucose homeostasis |
Acidic pH of GI Degradation by proteolytic enzymes Low permeation through intestine | Nanoparticles (NPs) | [ |
| Buccal |
Large surface area Easy and painless administration Permeation enhancers/enzymes can be incorporated |
Mucosal membranes may prevent drug from reaching systemic circulation Taste of drug system may result in poor patient compliance Accidental swallowing may occur | Transfersomes | [ |
| Nasal |
Easy introduction to systemic circulation Avoids gastric degradation |
Nasal mucosa barrier for insulin Mucociliary clearance | NPs | [ |
| Pulmonary |
Large surface area of alveolar epithelium resulting in quick systemic circulation |
Pulmonary administration may activate an immune response Mucosal barriers | Dendrimers | [ |
| Transdermal |
Sustained release Minimally invasive Avoidance of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) |
Skin barrier Epidermis limits drug diffusion to systemic circulation | NPs | [ |
Figure 5Differential morphology of the types of NPs employed for polymeric insulin delivery (reproduced with permission from Reference [52]).
Figure 6Illustration of stimuli-responsive mechanisms employing (A) temperature-sensitive polymer reactivity and (B) pH/temperature-responsive polymer reactivity undergoing sol–gel transition (adapted with permission from Reference [4]).
Figure 7Illustration of the mechanisms employed to achieve chemically controlled closed-loop systems for insulin release (adapted with modifications from Reference [102]).
Figure 8Illustration of an insulin patch and stimuli-responsive mechanism for transdermal insulin delivery (reproduced with permission from Reference [106]).
Figure 9Schematic representing (A) ConA, with an affinity to glucose, with four binding sites for glucose or glucose-linked molecules. (B) When an increase in blood glucose levels (BGLs) occurs, ConA binds to free glucose and releases its bonds to the matrix polymer, resulting in a separation of the polymeric chain. The hydrogel goes from gel to sol, with insulin being released. (C) With high BGLs, attachments between ConA and glycogen are destroyed, and the outer part of the carrier swells, with insulin being released (adapted with permission from Reference [4]).