| Literature DB >> 31443417 |
Yuhui Pi1, Zhe Huang2, Yingxing Pi1, Guangcan Li3, Yan Li3.
Abstract
Based on an analysis of the cold regeneration mechanism of emulsified asphalt, the emulsified asphalt binders and cement were applied to prepare the cold recycled mixtures, and the main technical performances of the designed mixtures were evaluated, including high-temperature stability, water stability, and fatigue characteristics. A high content of 65% recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) material was used with some new aggregates and mineral powders, and the optimal emulsified asphalt binder and cement dosages were determined as 2.9% and 1.5% respectively. The technical performance test results show that: (1) The well-designed emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixtures have good high-temperature stability and water stability, and can meet the requirements of the road base layer and the lower layer. (2) When the stress level is lower, the fatigue performance of mixtures with lower emulsified asphalt binder dosage and lower cement content is better, but when the stress level is higher, the high dosage of emulsified asphalt binder is more favorable, while the cement content has little effect on the fatigue property. (3) The emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixtures have relatively poor fatigue resistance, and their fatigue life is significantly lower than that of the hot mixed asphalt mixtures.Entities:
Keywords: cold recycled asphalt mixtures; composition design; emulsified asphalt; fatigue characteristics; technical performance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443417 PMCID: PMC6747590 DOI: 10.3390/ma12172682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Technical properties of emulsified asphalt.
| Indexes | Test Results | Technical Requirements | Technical Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen residual | <0.1 | ≤0.1 | T0652 |
| Determination of Residue by Evaporation, % | 58.7 | ≥55 | T0651 |
| Demulsification Rate | Slow | Slow | T0658 |
| Charge | Cationic | Cationic | T0653 |
| Penetration (25 °C), 1/10mm | 88 | 45–150 | T0604 |
| Softening Point, °C | - | T0606 | |
| Ductility (15 °C), cm | 87.0 | ≥40 | T0605 |
| Storage Stability 5d | 3.5 | <5 | T0655 |
| Solubility (Trichloroethylene), % | 99 | >97.5 | T0607 |
| Standard Viscosity C25.3, s | 15.0 | 10–60 | T0621 |
| binding area | ≥4/5 | ≥4/5 |
Technical properties of P.O. 32.5 cement.
| Indexes | Test Result | Technical Requirements | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fineness (%) (0.08 mm square hole sieve residue) | 3.4 | ≤15 | |
| Initial setting time (min) | 180 | ≥45 | |
| Final setting time (min) | 360 | ≤390 | |
| Stability (boiling) | Qualified | Qualified required | |
| Compressive strength (MPa) | 3 days | 20.1 | ≥16 |
| 28 days | 48.8 | ≥42.5 | |
| Flexural strength (MPa) | 3 days | 4.6 | ≥3.4 |
| 28 days | 7.8 | ≥6.4 | |
Passing rate of the key sieve for the design mixture.
|
| 26.5 | 19 | 9.5 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 0.3 | 0.075 |
|
| 100 | 99.4 | 67.0 | 44.3 | 29.2 | 9.1 | 4.9 |
Figure 1Gradation Curve of Emulsified Asphalt Cold Recycling Mixtures (65%RAP).
Figure 2Marshall Stability Trend Chart.
Figure 3Void volume Trend Chart.
Splitting test results of emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixtures.
| Cement Content (%) | Emulsified Asphalt Content (%) | 15 °C Splitting Strength (MPa) | Technical Requirements (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2.9 | 0.56 | ≥0.5 |
| 1.5 | 2.9 | 0.59 | |
| 2.0 | 2.9 | 0.61 |
Dynamic stability of two gradations.
| Grading Type | 45 min Deformation/mm | 60 min Deformation/mm | Dynamic Stability/Cycles·mm−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% RAP | 3.683 | 4.087 | 1560 |
| 65% RAP | 3.293 | 3.535 | 2157 |
Figure 4Comparison of Strength of Two Mixtures.
The dry, freeze-thaw and wet splitting strengths.
| Mixtures Type | Dry Splitting Strength (MPa) | Freeze-Thaw Splitting Strength (MPa) | Wet Splitting Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixture with 100%RAP | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Mixture with 65%RAP | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.41 |
Fatigue times of recycled materials with different parameters.
| Asphalt Content (%) | Cement Content (%) | Splitting Strength (MPa) | Stress Ratio | Dry Splitting Fatigue Life | Wet Splitting Fatigue Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2 | 0.65 | 0.5 | 13,725 | |
| 0.6 | 2512 | ||||
| 0.7 | 600 | ||||
| 4 | 2 | 0.71 | 0.4 | 10,500 | |
| 0.5 | 3800 | 1500 | |||
| 0.6 | 1100 | 700 | |||
| 0.7 | 620 | 260 | |||
| 0.8 | 350 | ||||
| 5 | 2 | 0.62 | 0.4 | 22,000 | |
| 0.5 | 6700 | ||||
| 0.6 | 5500 | ||||
| 0.7 | 4300 | ||||
| 0.8 | 3400 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 0.59 | 0.4 | 25,550 | |
| 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0.5 | 7438 | |
| 0.6 | 1736 | ||||
| 0.7 | 600 | ||||
| 0.8 | 290 |
Figure 5Logarithm of fatigue life with different parameters. (a) (3,2) Fatigue equation; (b) (4,2) fatigue equation; (c) (4,1) fatigue equation; (d) (4,3) fatigue equation; (e) (5,2) fatigue equation.
Fatigue equations for different asphalt and cement contents.
| Emulsified Asphalt and Cement Content | Linear Equation | Fatigue Equation |
|---|---|---|
| (3%, 2%) | y = 0.1075x − 0.1437 |
|
| (4%, 2%) | y = 0.1794x − 0.337 |
|
| (5%, 2%) | y = 0.3558x − 1.1229 |
|
| (4%, 1%) | y = 0.1612x − 0.3105 |
|
| (4%, 3%) | y = 0.1432x − 0.2484 |
|
Figure 6Comparison of dry and wet fatigue times.
Figure 7Fatigue times of different asphalt contents.
Figure 8Fatigue times of different cement contents.
Figure 9Comparison of Emulsified Asphalt Cold Recycled Mixtures and Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures.
Figure 10Comparison of emulsified asphalt cold recycled mixtures and foamed asphalt mixtures.