| Literature DB >> 31443178 |
Eleftheria Kotroni1, Eleftheria Simirioti1, Stefanos Kikionis2, Ioannis Sfiniadakis3, Aggeliki Siamidi1, Vangelis Karalis1, Andreas Vitsos1, Marilena Vlachou1, Efstathia Ioannou2, Vassilios Roussis4, Michail Rallis5.
Abstract
Skin inflammation is the most common symptom in dermatological diseases. It is usually treated by topically applied products, such as creams, gels and lotions. Skin dressings offer a promising alternative as they are endowed with more controlled administration conditions. In this study, the anti-inflammatory activity of electrospun alginate micro/nanofibrous dressings loaded with the aqueous extract of Pinus halepensis bark (PHBE) was evaluated in vivo in mice. The upper back skin of SKH-1 female hairless mice was exposed to a single dose of ultraviolet radiation (3 MEDs) and the inflamed area was treated daily by the direct application of a nanofibrous patch. The condition of the skin was evaluated primarily on the basis of clinical observation, photo-documentation and histopathological assessment, while measurements of the erythema, hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and sebum production were also taken into account. The results showed that the topical application of alginate micro/nanofibrous dressings loaded with PHBE on UV-inflamed skin significantly attenuated inflammation damage, reducing the healing period. Increase of the loading dose of PHBE resulted in a proportional reduction of the extent, the density and the depth of skin inflammation. With the steadily increasing interest of the skin dressing industry towards nanofibrous matrices, electrospun nonwovens could serve as ideal candidates for the development of multifunctional anti-inflammatory care systems.Entities:
Keywords: Pinus halepensis bark extract; UV-induced inflammation; anti-inflammatory activity; electrospun nanofibrous patches; mice; skin
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443178 PMCID: PMC6720688 DOI: 10.3390/ma12162596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Electrospun micro/nanofibrous mats composed of different weight ratios of pine bark extract.
| % w/w/patch | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch | CA 1 | PHBE 2 | PEO 3 | SA 4 |
| CA-PEO | 80 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| CA-(PEO/SA) | 80 | 0 | 6.7 | 13.3 |
| (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-A | 76.6 | 4.3 | 6.4 | 12.8 |
| (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-B | 73.5 | 8.2 | 6.1 | 12.2 |
| (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-C | 67.9 | 15.1 | 5.7 | 11.3 |
| (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-D | 59.0 | 26.2 | 4.9 | 9.8 |
1 Cellulose acetate; 2 Pinus halepensis bark aqueous extract; 3 Polyethylene oxide; 4 Sodium alginate.
Figure 1SEM images of (a) CA, (b) PEO, (c) PEO/SA, (d) CA-PEO, (e) CA-(PEO/SA) and (f) (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-D patches.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of CA-(PEO/SA), PHBE and (CA/PHBE)-(PEO/SA)-D patches.
Figure 3Histograms of (a) erythema, (b) hydration, (c) TEWL and (d) sebum production in relation to time after UV exposure.
Figure 4Representative images of the mice back skin before (day 1), during (days 4 and 7) and at the end (day 10) of the treatment period.
Figure 5Histological evaluation: skin sections of the different mice groups (magnification 100×).