Literature DB >> 31443108

Automated classification of gastric neoplasms in endoscopic images using a convolutional neural network.

Bum-Joo Cho1,2,3, Chang Seok Bang3,4,5, Se Woo Park4,5, Young Joo Yang3,4,5, Seung In Seo4,5, Hyun Lim4,5, Woon Geon Shin4,5, Ji Taek Hong4,5, Yong Tak Yoo6, Seok Hwan Hong6, Jae Ho Choi3, Jae Jun Lee3,7, Gwang Ho Baik4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visual inspection, lesion detection, and differentiation between malignant and benign features are key aspects of an endoscopist's role. The use of machine learning for the recognition and differentiation of images has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice. This study aimed to establish convolutional neural network (CNN) models to automatically classify gastric neoplasms based on endoscopic images.
METHODS: Endoscopic white-light images of pathologically confirmed gastric lesions were collected and classified into five categories: advanced gastric cancer, early gastric cancer, high grade dysplasia, low grade dysplasia, and non-neoplasm. Three pretrained CNN models were fine-tuned using a training dataset. The classifying performance of the models was evaluated using a test dataset and a prospective validation dataset.
RESULTS: A total of 5017 images were collected from 1269 patients, among which 812 images from 212 patients were used as the test dataset. An additional 200 images from 200 patients were collected and used for prospective validation. For the five-category classification, the weighted average accuracy of the Inception-Resnet-v2 model reached 84.6 %. The mean area under the curve (AUC) of the model for differentiating gastric cancer and neoplasm was 0.877 and 0.927, respectively. In prospective validation, the Inception-Resnet-v2 model showed lower performance compared with the endoscopist with the best performance (five-category accuracy 76.4 % vs. 87.6 %; cancer 76.0 % vs. 97.5 %; neoplasm 73.5 % vs. 96.5 %; P  < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the Inception-Resnet-v2 model and the endoscopist with the worst performance in the differentiation of gastric cancer (accuracy 76.0 % vs. 82.0 %) and neoplasm (AUC 0.776 vs. 0.865).
CONCLUSION: The evaluated deep-learning models have the potential for clinical application in classifying gastric cancer or neoplasm on endoscopic white-light images. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31443108     DOI: 10.1055/a-0981-6133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  31 in total

Review 1.  State of the Art: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy 2020.

Authors:  Jiyoung Lee; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 2.  The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review.

Authors:  Kailai Xiang; Baihui Jiang; Dong Shang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 3.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Protruded Lesions Using Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Eun Jeong Gong; Chang Seok Bang; Jae Jun Lee; Ki Tae Suk; Gwang Ho Baik
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-17

4.  No-Code Platform-Based Deep-Learning Models for Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Histology from White-Light Endoscopy Images: Development and Performance Verification.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Gong; Chang Seok Bang; Jae Jun Lee; Seung In Seo; Young Joo Yang; Gwang Ho Baik; Jong Wook Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-12

5.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fei Kuang; Juan Du; Mengjia Zhou; Xiangdong Liu; Xinchen Luo; Yong Tang; Bo Li; Song Su
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Application of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Na Hu; Zhi-Yin Huang; Bin Song; Chun-Cheng Wu; Fan-Xin Zeng; Min Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  Computer tomographic differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst: classification using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Mayara Simões Bispo; Mário Lúcio Gomes de Queiroz Pierre Júnior; Antônio Lopes Apolinário; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Braulio Carneiro Junior; Frederico Sampaio Neves; Iêda Crusoé-Rebello
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review.

Authors:  Mate E Maros; Thomas Ganslandt; Hee E Kim; Alejandro Cosa-Linan; Nandhini Santhanam; Mahboubeh Jannesari
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Prediction of Submucosal Invasion for Gastric Neoplasms in Endoscopic Images Using Deep-Learning.

Authors:  Bum-Joo Cho; Chang Seok Bang; Jae Jun Lee; Chang Won Seo; Ju Han Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.