| Literature DB >> 31442291 |
Jordana C A Assis1, Danimar Lopez-Hernández1, Eduardo A Pulido-Murillo1, Alan L Melo1, Hudson A Pinto1.
Abstract
Hippocrepis hippocrepis is a notocotylid that has been widely reported in capybaras; however, the molluscs that act as intermediate hosts of this parasite remain unknown. Furthermore, there are currently no molecular data available for H. hippocrepis regarding its phylogenetic relationship with other members of the family Notocotylidae. In the present study, we collected monostome cercariae and adult parasites from the planorbid Biomphalaria straminea and in the large intestine of capybaras, respectively, from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. We subjected them to morphological and molecular (amplification and sequencing of partial regions of 28S and cox-1 genes) studies. Adult parasites collected from the capybaras were identified as H. hippocrepis and the sequences obtained for both molecular markers showed 100% similarity with monostome cercariae found in B. straminea. The sequences obtained for H. hippocrepis were compared with data available in public databases; analysis revealed this species differs from other notocotylids with available sequences (1.5-3.8% with respect to 28S and 11.4%-13.8% with respect to cox-1). On the phylogenetic analyses, H. hippocrepis appeared to be a distinct lineage in relation to other notocotylids. Some ecological aspects related to the infection of capybaras with H. hippocrepis are briefly discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31442291 PMCID: PMC6707557 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Morphometric data of cercariae, metacercariae and rediae of Hippocrepis hippocrepis found in Biomphalaria straminea from Brazil and measures of larval notocotylids reported in Biomphalaria spp. from South America by different authors.
Data are presented in micrometer (unless otherwise indicated) and are given by mean followed by the standard deviation and range between parentheses. Abbreviations: L: length; W: width.
| Species | Notocotylidae | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | Present study | Ostrowski | Veitenheimer- | Hamman | Flores and Brugni (2005) [ | |
| de Núñez (1976) [ | Mendes | |||||
| Host | ||||||
| Locality | Brazil | Argentina | Brazil | Argentina | Argentina | |
| Body | L | 291 ± 16 (273–314) | 233–350 | 140–315 | 348 ± 32 (315–394) | 369 (346–394) |
| W | 132 ± 10 (109–150) | 116 | 99–138 | 150± 17 (134–171) | 191 (154–221) | |
| Oral sucker | L | 41 ± 1 (37–43) | 40–45 | 34–58 | 48± 7 (36–58) | 42 (36–53) |
| W | 41 ± 2 (38–45) | 32–45 | – | – | 41 (34–50) | |
| Lateral eyespots | L | 19 ± 2 (15–23) | 1 8 | 14–16 | – | – |
| W | 19 ± 3 (15–25) | – | – | – | – | |
| Median eyespot | L | 13 ± 2 (10–15) | – | 8 | – | – |
| W | 12 ± 2 (10–15) | – | – | – | – | |
| Tail | L | 334 ± 53 (205–403) | 360–371 | 190–410 | 416 ±52 (360–495) | 702 (634–797) |
| W | 53 ± 6 (41–68) | 31 | 28–48 | 66 ±11 (54–81) | 62 (55–77) | |
| L | 146 ± 6 (137–163) | 156–175 | 140–196 | – | 152 (146–158) | |
| W | 143 ± 6 (128–154) | 148–168 | – | – | – | |
| Cystic wall | L | 15 ± 3 (9–21) | 13 | 14–22 | – | 14 (10–17) |
| Body | L | 1358 ± 199 (997–1891) | 1272 | – | – | 1013 (643–1248) |
| W | 277 ± 39 (189–361) | 310 | – | – | 218 (173–307) | |
| Pharynx | L | 54 ± 5 (47–67) | 59 | – | – | 68 (58–86) |
| W | 58 ± 6 (47–75) | 64 | – | – | 73 (58–96) | |
| Caecum | L | 996 ± 219 (602–1547) | – | – | – | 600 (288–893) |
| W | 164 ± 36 (102–239) | – | – | – | – |
Morphometric data obtained Hippocrepis hippocrepis found in capybaras from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais Brazil and data reported to Hippocrepis spp. from South America by different authors.
Data are presented in micrometer (unless otherwise indicated) and are given by mean followed by the standard deviation and range between parentheses. Abbreviations: L: length; W: width.
| Species | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | Present study | Kohn and Pereira (1970) [ | Sutton et al. (1997) [ | Travassos and Vogelsang, (1930) [ | Flores et al. (2007) [ | |
| Host | ||||||
| Locality | Brazil | Brazil | Argentina | Uruguay | Argentina | |
| Body | L | 7.9 ± 1.4 (6.0–10) mm | 6–17.5 mm | 8.8 (2.93–11.9) mm | 6–8 mm | 4.6 ± 0.85 (2.8–6.4) mm |
| W | 1.65 ± 275.4 (1.01–2.23) mm | 1.3–3.35 mm | 1.8 (0.71–2.5) mm | 1–1.5 mm | 1.2 ± 0.26 (0.79–1.6) mm | |
| Oral sucker | L | 593 ± 63 (453–714) | 360–960 | 670 (320–890) | 370–410 | 400 ± 60 (250–520) |
| W | 646 ± 115 (453–907) | 480–1080 | 780 (280–850) | 350–370 | 450± 60 (310–540) | |
| Cirrus sac | L | 2.6 ± 0.5 (1.8–3.4) mm | 1.6–5.73 mm | 3.46 (1.04–4.81) mm | 1.71–1.97 mm | 1.29 ± 0.28 (0.76–2.17) mm |
| Right testes | L | 737 ± 105 (485–1052) | 680–1600 | 750 (300–980) | 710–850 | 620± 90 (400–810) |
| W | 549 ± 98 (329–729) | 480–1060 | 580 (240–860) | 620–710 | 420± 70 (280–520) | |
| Left testes | L | 740 ± 145 (379–961) | 680–1380 | 740 (270–910) | 710–850 | 610 ± 110 (360–860) |
| W | 564 ± 115 (363–843) | 480–860 | 550 (240–760) | 620–710 | 400 ± 70 (280–520) | |
| Ovary | L | 280 ± 59 (186–400) | 260–680 | 330 (90–430) | 480–520 | 210 ± 40 (130–340) |
| W | 634 ± 90 (479–843) | 480–900 | 480 (160–630) | 310–420 | 370 ± 50 (250–450) | |
| Mehlis’ gland | L | 230 ± 45 (143–336) | 190–540 | 400 (310–460) | – | – |
| W | 448 ± 85 (300–593) | 360–700 | 540 (430–600) | – | – | |
| Eggs | L | 22 ± 2 (19–27) | 18–23 | 20 (16–25) | 27–29 | 26 ± 1 (24–26) |
| W | 12 ± 1.4 (11–16) | 9–14 | 10 (9–10) | 13 | 13 ± 1 (12–14) | |
| Egg filaments | L | 389 ± 36 (314–454) | 141–149 | - | Absent | 54 ± 16 (19–72) |
Fig 3Phylogenetic relationship between Hippocrepis hippocrepis (in bold) and other species of the superfamily Pronocephaloidea, as inferred from sequences of 28S rDNA analyzed by Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods.
Nodal support is indicated as BI/ML; values < 0.90 (BI) and < 50 (ML) are indicated by a dash. Asterisks indicate clades that were not present in tree obtained by ML.