Literature DB >> 31440801

Resolution of indeterminate MRI with CEUS in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Jinghui Hu1, Deepak Bhayana1, Kelly W Burak1, Stephanie R Wilson2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To show the contribution of CEUS to characterization of indeterminate MRI observations in high-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: From July to December 2015, 42 consecutive patients referred to CEUS with indeterminate MRI scans comprise our study cohort. There are 50 indeterminate nodule-like observations and 10 arterial phase hyperenhancing foci, suggesting pseudolesions/arterio-portal shunts. MRI and CEUS lesions are classified according to their enhancement features in all phases and Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS) in a blind read format. Clinical pathologic correlation and 24 months follow-up are performed.
RESULTS: A majority, 37/50 (74%), of indeterminate nodule-like observations have arterial phase enhancement without washout on MRI. CEUS further characterizes enhancement and shows washout in 14/37 (38%). In total, CEUS diagnoses 16 malignant lesions in 14 patients including 14 HCC and 2 ICC. 12/16 (75%) malignant lesions are confirmed by biopsy or follow-up. Ultrasound identification of a nodule differentiates real nodules from pseudolesions. Of the ten suspected arterial-portal shunts on MRI, two show a real nodule on ultrasound, confirmed as an HCC and a regenerative nodule. 15/42 (36%) patients have LI-RADS escalated from LR-3 or 4 on MRI to LR-4 or 5 on CEUS. Overall, the sensitivity of CEUS is (13/16) 81.3% and specificity is (37/37) 100% for malignant diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Grayscale ultrasound detects true nodules. Dynamic CEUS detects and characterizes washout, correctly predicting HCC. CEUS is complimentary to MRI and can serve as a problem-solving tool when MRI is indeterminate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEUS; Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Indeterminate MRI observations; MRI

Year:  2020        PMID: 31440801     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  6 in total

Review 1.  Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Characterize Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  David T Fetzer; Yuko Kono; Shuchi K Rodgers
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

2.  Use of CEUS LI-RADS for the Accurate Diagnosis of Nodules in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Alina Makoyeva; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Alejandra Medellin; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-03-27

3.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients.

Authors:  Vincent Schwarze; Constantin Marschner; Wiebke Völckers; Sergio Grosu; Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo; Johannes Rübenthaler; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  The Relationship between Ultrasonographic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Severity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Expression of PTEN and Tg737.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Yan Zhang; Qiong Zhou; Qiaojun Hong; Zhanggui Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?

Authors:  Cosmin Caraiani; Bianca Boca; Vlad Bura; Zeno Sparchez; Yi Dong; Christoph Dietrich
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 6.  Imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Future directions with special emphasis on hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Junghoan Park; Jeong Min Lee; Tae-Hyung Kim; Jeong Hee Yoon
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.