Literature DB >> 31440553

Experimental data of the distillation of bio-oil from thermal cracking of methyl ester in castor oil.

Guilherme Menshhein1, Vanderlei Costa1, Luana M Chiarello1, Dilamara R Scharf1, Edesio L Simionato2, Vanderleia Botton1, Henry F Meier1, Vinicyus R Wiggers1, Laércio Ender1.   

Abstract

This article presents the experimental data on distillation of bio-oil obtained from thermal cracking of a mixture of castor oil and its methyl esters. The interpretation of the data can be found in Menshhein et al. (2019) available on https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.136. Experiments were carried out using a simple distillation apparatus and the products were quantified and qualified from Gas Chromatography - Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID) with standards compounds. Data were presented in terms of distillation equipment and distillation curve values of volume and temperature of the crude bio-oil sample. Information about GC-FID methods and chromatograms of from standard heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate and their analytical curve. Carbon number data of crude bio-oil sample was also showed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-oil; Distillation; Gas chromatographic analyses

Year:  2019        PMID: 31440553      PMCID: PMC6699470          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table The data provides details from noncomplex distillation equipment and the distillation curve of the bio-oil from thermal cracking of methyl ester in castor oil, which will enable comparison of results; This data provides a GC-FID chromatogram and data from crude bio-oil presenting the different carbon range of this sample; Information regarding GC-FID chromatograms detailing the analytical curves of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate standards.

Data

Fig. 1 presented the distillation equipment design. Table 1 shows the distillation curve values of volume and temperature of the crude bio-oil sample. Table 2 presents the gas chromatography methods used in this work. In Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Table 3 are the observed chromatograms of GC-FID from standard heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate and their analytical curve as graphic and table, respectively. Fig. 4 illustrates the chromatogram of carbon number of crude bio-oil sample. Table 4 presents the carbon number data for the crude bio-oil sample.
Fig. 1

Distillation equipment design: 1) distillation apparatus 2) pump and 3) thermostatic bath.

Table 1

Distillation curve data of the crude bio-oil sample.

Temperature (°C)Distilled volume (%)
120.4 ± 4.30
144.0 ± 6.05
207.5 ± 5.415
216.6 ± 1.720
219.7 ± 1.225
221.5 ± 1.230
225.4 ± 5.840
235.3 ± 1.445
275.5 ± 3.950
297.9 ± 1.955
307.9 ± 7.360
314.6 ± 3.565
327.5 ± 7.970
348.6 ± 3.275
367.6 ± 4.380
378.1 ± 5.684
398.2 ± 7.985
412.3 ± 6.286
424.9 ± 1.287
439.2 ± 6.588
Table 2

Gas chromatography with flame ionization detector methods.

DescriptionAnalysesColumnCarrier gasOven Heating methodInjector/DetectorT (°C)
GC-2010 ShimadzuCarbon numberOV-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm x 0.25 μm)HeliumInitially 150 °C (for 1 min), increasing to 280 °C at a ramp of 5 °C min−1. The T was kept at 280 °C for 23 min.250/280
StandardHeptaldehydeMethyl undecenoate
Purity (%)≥9296
SupplierSigma-AldrichSigma-Aldrich
7890B AgilentDesired compoundsStabilwax capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm x 0.25 μm)HeliumInitially 50 °C (for 3 min), increasing to 250 °C at a ramp of 5 °C min−1. The T was kept at 250 °C for 7 min.250/300
StandardC8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17C18C19
Purity (%)98.099.099.899.899.899.599.599.899.899.899.899.0
SupplierS-AaVbFcFFFFFFFFS-A

S-A = Sigma-Aldrich.

V = Vetec.

F = Fluka.

Fig. 2

Chromatograms of GC-FID from standard of (a) heptaldehyde and (b) methyl undecenoate with concentration of these compounds varying from 0.46 to 48%.

Fig. 3

Analytical curve of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate, with R2 of 0.9962 and 0.9967, respectively.

Table 3

Data from analytical curve of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate.

Concentration (%)Area (AU)
HeptaldehydeMethyl undecenoate
0.46185.2
0.48272.5
0.92286.3
0.96492.1
7.362651.9
7.683789.8
18.46584.1
19.29906.2
27.611476.4
28.815029
32.212825.6
33.616298.2
46.017647.2
48.022780.7
Fig. 4

Carbon number chromatograms of crude bio-oil sample.

Table 4

Carbon number range for the crude bio-oil sample.

Carbon RangeCrude bio-oil (%)
Below C914.79 ± 0.65
C9 to C1041.16 ± 1.37
C10 to C115.31 ± 0.17
C11 to C123.87 ± 0.06
C12 to C132.07 ± 0.11
C13 to C142.16 ± 0.05
C14 to C1512.65 ± 0.27
C15 to C161.09 ± 0.02
C16 to C171.50 ± 0.04
C17 to C183.65 ± 0.13
C18 to C190.79 ± 0.04
Above C1911.13 ± 1.17
Distillation equipment design: 1) distillation apparatus 2) pump and 3) thermostatic bath. Distillation curve data of the crude bio-oil sample. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detector methods. S-A = Sigma-Aldrich. V = Vetec. F = Fluka. Chromatograms of GC-FID from standard of (a) heptaldehyde and (b) methyl undecenoate with concentration of these compounds varying from 0.46 to 48%. Analytical curve of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate, with R2 of 0.9962 and 0.9967, respectively. Data from analytical curve of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate. Carbon number chromatograms of crude bio-oil sample. Carbon number range for the crude bio-oil sample.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Materials

Experiments were carried out with bio-oil produced by Botton et al. [2] from thermal cracking of methyl ester in castor oil at 475–525 °C with residence time of 44–104 s.

Distillation curve

Experiments were performed in an automatic vacuum distiller as illustrated in Fig. 1 (B/R Instrument, model M690) [3], [4], based on the standards for petroleum characterization [5], [6]. The data obtained in this analysis is show in Table 1.

GC-FID analyses

All these analyses were performed in triplicate (Table 2). The desired compounds - heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate - were analyzed by GC-FID using an Agilent GC-FID, model 7890B (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, EUA) (Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Table 3). The carbon number of bio-oil samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu GC-FID, according to Beims et al. [3] by n-alkane comparison (Fig. 4 and Table 4).

Specifications table

Subject areaThermal cracking (pyrolysis) of triglycerides
More specific subject areaBio-oil distillation
Type of dataFigures and tables
How data was acquiredExperiments, physicochemical and chromatographic analysis (distiller: B/R Instrument, model M690, GC-FID: 7890B/Agilent and 2010/Shimadzu)
Data formatRaw and tabulated data collection
Experimental factorsVolumetric data from distillation curve of thermal cracking fraction and chromatographic data
Experimental featuresDistillation cuts of bio-oil from thermal cracking of methyl ester in castor oil
Data source locationBlumenau/SC – Brazil, University of Blumenau – FURBChemical Engineering Department
Data accessibilityData is with this article
Related research articleMenshhein et al., Concentration of Renewable Products of Crude Bio-Oil from Thermal Cracking of the Methyl Esters in Castor Oil[1].
Value of the data

The data provides details from noncomplex distillation equipment and the distillation curve of the bio-oil from thermal cracking of methyl ester in castor oil, which will enable comparison of results;

This data provides a GC-FID chromatogram and data from crude bio-oil presenting the different carbon range of this sample;

Information regarding GC-FID chromatograms detailing the analytical curves of heptaldehyde and methyl undecenoate standards.

  1 in total

1.  Experimental data of thermal cracking of soybean oil and blends with hydrogenated fat.

Authors:  R F Beims; V Botton; L Ender; D R Scharf; E L Simionatto; H F Meier; V R Wiggers
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-01-31
  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pyrolysis of Methyl Ricinoleate: Distribution and Characteristics of Fast and Slow Pyrolysis Products.

Authors:  Xiaoning Mao; Qinglong Xie; Ying Duan; Shangzhi Yu; Yong Nie
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.