| Literature DB >> 31440378 |
Takehiko Yamanaka1,2, Yuto Uchida1, Keita Sakurai3, Daisuke Kato1, Masayuki Mizuno1, Toyohiro Sato1, Yuta Madokoro1, Yuko Kondo1, Ayuko Suzuki1, Yoshino Ueki4, Fumiyasu Ishii2, Cesar V Borlongan5, Noriyuki Matsukawa1.
Abstract
Although several studies have demonstrated correlation between white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and impairment of executive functions, the underlying anatomical-functional relationships are not fully understood. The present study sought to investigate the correlations between the volume of WMH and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) using quantitative magnetic resonance image (MRI) and a variety of executive function assessments. A total of 91 patients ranging in age from 58 to 90 years with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or early phase AD were recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Department of Neurology of Nagoya City University Hospital. We administered neuropsychological batteries evaluating verbal memory, orientation, spatial ability, sustained attention, and a variety of executive functions, including verbal fluency, flexibility, inhibition, and working memory. Quantitative MRI analyses were performed using Dr. View/Linux software and a voxel-based specific regional analysis system. Significant correlations were observed between WMH, as well as MTA, and some executive function scores. Regression analysis revealed that MTA was the strongest predictor of flexibility and verbal fluency. These findings provide new insight into the relationship between quantitative MRI analyses and various types of executive dysfunction in elderly people with MCI due to AD and/or early phase AD. When cognitive function is examined in elderly patients with MCI due to AD or early phase AD, it is important to consider the involvement of WMH and MTA, which is indicative of AD pathology in cognitive dysfunction, particularly executive function.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; executive function; quantitative analysis; white matter hyperintensity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31440378 PMCID: PMC6675535 DOI: 10.14336/AD.2018.0929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Dis ISSN: 2152-5250 Impact factor: 6.745
Figure 1.Quantitative analysis of white matter hyperintensity volume
A representative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image (A). Using the bitmap statistics method in Dr. View/Linux, white matter hyperintensity volume segmentations are automatically generated (B).
Clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Number (Male / Female) | 91 (37 / 54) |
| Age (years) | 75.9 ± 6.3 |
| Education (years) | 11.4 ± 3.1 |
| Mini-Mental State Examination | 23.5 ± 4.1 |
| Clinical Dementia Rating Scale | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
| MTA Z score | 2.4 ± 1.1 |
| WMH volume (cm^3) | 29.3 ± 23.1 |
| PVH volume (cm^3) | 15.3 ± 9.9 |
| DSWMH volume (cm^3) | 14.0 ± 15.5 |
| DSWMH-F volume (cm^3) | 5.7 ± 6.8 |
Data are mean ± SD.
MTA = medial temporal lobe atrophy; WMH = white matter hyperintensity; PVH = periventricular hyperintensity; DSWMH, deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity; DSWMH-F = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity of frontal lobe.
Correlation between cognitive performance and MRI variables.
| Cognitive function test (max score) | Value | MTA | PVH | DSWMH | DSWMH-F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10WDR (10) | 2.5 ± 2.4 | -0.309 | -0.228 | -0.028 | -0.069 | ||
| ADAS-J | 1.5 ± 1.5 | 0.301 | 0.155 | 0.137 | 0.106 | ||
| ADAS-J | 0.5 ± 0.5 | -0.229 | 0.005 | 0.225 | 0.193 | ||
| TMT-A | 79.7 ± 42.5 | -0.074 | 0.367 | 0.443 | 0.353 | ||
| Working Memory | DST-B | 3.7 ± 1.0 | -0.046 | -0.266 | -0.172 | -0.128 | |
| Inhibition | MST-B | 56.8 ± 31.6 | 0.065 | 0.280 | 0.282 | 0.172 | |
| Flexibility | TMT-B/A | 3.4 ± 2.7 | 0.305 | -0.029 | -0.142 | -0.072 | |
| Verbal Fluency | SVF | 11.2 ± 4.4 | -0.336 | -0.391 | -0.311 | -0.288 | |
| FAB (18) | 13.9 ± 2.7 | -0.132 | -0.219 | -0.219 | -0.180 | ||
MRI = magnetic resonance image; MTA = medial temporal lobe atrophy; PVH = periventricular hyperintensity; DSWMH = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity; DSWMH-F = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity of frontal lobe; 10WDR = 10 words delay recall; ADAS-J = Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale Japanese version; TMT = Trail making test; DST-B = digit span test backward; MST-B = Modified stroop test part B; SVF = semantic verbal fluency; FAB = Frontal assessment battery.
Significant difference (p < 0.05);
Significant difference (p < 0.01).
Figure 2.Correlation analyses between verbal fluency scores and imaging parameters
Significant negative correlations were confirmed with MTA (r = -0.336, p = 0.003; A) PVH (r = -0.391, p < 0.001; B) DSWMH (r = -0.311, p = 0.006; C) DSWMH-F (r = -0.288, p = 0.013; D) MTA = medial temporal lobe atrophy; PVH = periventricular hyperintensity; DSWMH = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity; DSWMH-F = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity of frontal lobe.
Predictive values of MRI valuables for cognitive performance.
| Cognitive function test (max score) | MTA | PVH | DSWMH | DSWMH-F | Age | Education | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10WDR (β) | -0.309 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| ADAS-J Orientation (β) | 0.320 | - | - | - | - | -0.392 | ||
| ADAS-J Copy (β) | -0.310 | - | - | - | - | -0.230 | ||
| TMT-A (β) | - | - | 0.405 | - | - | -0.379 | ||
| Working Memory | DST-B (β) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.258 | |
| Inhibition | MST-B (β) | - | - | 0.816 | 0.623 | 0.276 | -0.287 | |
| Flexibility | TMT-B/A (β) | 0.345 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Verbal Fluency | SVF (β) | -0.290 | -0.268 | - | - | - | 0.409 | |
| FAB (β) | - | -0.215 | - | - | - | 0.397 | ||
MRI = magnetic resonance image; MTA = medial temporal lobe atrophy; PVH = periventricular hyperintensity; DSWMH = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity; DSWMH-F = deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity of frontal lobe; 10WDR = 10 words delay recall; ADAS-J = Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale Japanese version; TMT = Trail making test; DST-B = digit span test backward; MST-B = Modified stroop test part B; SVF = semantic verbal fluency; FAB = Frontal assessment battery.
Significant difference (p < 0.05);
Significant difference (p < 0.01).