| Literature DB >> 31440375 |
Hongkui Wei1, Xichen Zhao1,2, Mao Xia1, Chengquan Tan2, Jun Gao3, John K Htoo4, Chuanhui Xu1, Jian Peng1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the nutritional requirements of lactating modern genotype sows have increased. The current nutritional recommendations might be unable to meet the needs of increased litter size and milk production, and thus the nutritional requirements need to be re-evaluated. The current study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary methionine to lysine (Met:Lys) ratios on the performance of and methionine metabolism in lactating sows.Entities:
Keywords: Lactation; Met to Lys ratios; Methionine; Oxidative stress; Piglet growth performance; Sow performance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31440375 PMCID: PMC6704691 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0373-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Ingredients and nutrient composition of diets
| Items | Met:Lys | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | |
| Ingredients, % | ||||
| Corn | 42.75 | 42.74 | 42.85 | 42.94 |
| Soybean meal (46% CP) | 24.3 | 24.2 | 24 | 23.9 |
| Red sorghum | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
| Shelly barley | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12.7 | 12.7 |
| Soybean oil | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Limestone | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.68 |
| MDCP | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.46 |
| Premixa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Salt | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Methionine | – | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.27 |
| Lysine (98%) | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Mold Inhibitor | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Composition (analysis) | ||||
| Lys, % | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.09 |
| Met, % | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.55 |
| Cys, % | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.27 |
| SAAs, % | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.82 |
| Met/Lys | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.50 |
| Thr, % | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
| Trp, % | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Val, % | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| Ile, % | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
| Leu, % | 1.53 | 1.50 | 1.49 | 1.53 |
| Arg, % | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| His, % | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.46 |
| Composition (calculated)b | ||||
| NE, kcal/kg | 2451 | 2452 | 2455 | 2452 |
| CP, % | 17.3 | 17.32 | 17.28 | 17.3 |
| Ca, % | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Available phosphorus, % | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| SID Lys, % | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| SID Met, % | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.5 |
| SID Cys, % | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| SID SAAs, % | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| SID Met/Lys | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.57 |
| SID Thr, % | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 |
| SID Trp, % | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| SID Val, % | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| SID Ile, % | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| SID Leu, % | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.31 | 1.31 |
| SID BCAA, % | 2.65 | 2.64 | 2.63 | 2.62 |
| SID Arg, % | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| SID His, % | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
aProvided per kilogram of the diet: Cu 30 mg; Fe 160 mg; Zn 150 mg; Mn 50 mg; I 0.53 mg; Se 0.53 mg; Co 0.75 mg; Cr 0.22 mg; vitamin A 1.271 × 104U; vitamin D3 2853 U; vitamin E 180 mg; vitamin K3 3.85 mg; vitamin B1 1.6 mg; vitamin B2 5.75 mg; vitamin B6 2.88 mg; vitamin B12 0.02 mg; nicotinamide 32 mg; pantothenic acid 20 mg; folic acid 3.2 mg; biotin 0.44 mg; vitamin C 450 mg; choline 1800 mg
bCalculated chemical concentrations using values for feed ingredients from the NRC (2012)
Effect of Met:Lys ratio in the lactation diet on the performance of sows
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | ||
| Basic information | ||||||||
| No. of sows | 33 | 32 | 32 | 33 | ||||
| Culleda during lactation | 4 | 1 | – | 1 | ||||
| Average body weight, kg | 266.70 | 266.50 | 266.70 | 266.40 | 1.64 | |||
| Average parity | 4.40 | 4.10 | 4.00 | 4.38 | 0.07 | |||
| BW of sows, kg | ||||||||
| Day 110 of lactation | 268.9 | 266.4 | 265.8 | 266.8 | 1.7 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.93 |
| Parturition | 264.8 | 262.3 | 261.8 | 262.8 | 1.7 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| Weaning | 245.2 | 243.9 | 244.5 | 247.3 | 1.8 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.92 |
| Loss during lactation | −19.6 | −18.4 | −17.2 | −15.4 | 1.4 | 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| WEI of sows, d | ||||||||
| No. of sows | 29 | 31 | 31 | 32 | ||||
| Within 1 week | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0.13 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| After 1 week | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.22 |
| Estrus rate of sows, %b | ||||||||
| Within 1 week | 89.66 | 77.42 | 93.55 | 90.63 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.22 | |
| After 1 week | 96.55 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.35 | |
| Sow backfat thickness, mm | ||||||||
| No. of sows | 32 | 32 | 32 | 33 | ||||
| Day 110 of lactation | 15.72 | 15.97 | 15.72 | 15.33 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.83 |
| Parturition | 14.94 | 15.38 | 15.19 | 14.76 | 0.27 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.86 |
| No. of sows | 29 | 31 | 32 | 33 | ||||
| Weaning | 14.41 | 15.29 | 14.94 | 14.42 | 0.26 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.57 |
| Loss during lactation | −0.59 | −0.19 | −0.25 | −0.33 | 0.21 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| Lactation performance, kg | ||||||||
| Total milk yieldc | 203.59 | 207.18 | 213.29 | 210.94 | 3.26 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| Average daily milk yield | 11.10 | 11.34 | 11.62 | 11.44 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
SEM standard error of the mean, BW body weight, WEI weaning to estrous interval; Annotation: significance test for estrus rate of each group derived from the chi-square test; N indicates the number of sows
aThe sows eliminated in each group for death, lameness, limb hoof disease and so forth during lactation
bSignificance test for estrus rate of each group derived from the chi-square test
cThe result of total milk yield during the whole lactation period is shown as Lsmeans and derived from the mixed procedure of SAS (8.0). The formula for the calculation of total milk yield is total milk yield (kg) = piglet ADG × litter size × lactating days × 4 [13]
Effect of dietary Met:Lys ratio in the lactation diet on growth performance of piglets
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | ||
| No. of sows | 27 | 30 | 28 | 31 | ||||
| Litter size, number/litter | ||||||||
| After cross-fostering | 11.26 | 11.5 | 11.18 | 11.42 | 0.09 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.58 |
| At day 7 | 10.63 | 10.87 | 10.14 | 10.45 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.49 | 0.15 |
| At day 14 | 10.22 | 10.47 | 9.68 | 10.13 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.11 |
| Pigs weaned | 9.89 | 10.13 | 9.36 | 9.97 | 0.13 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.15 |
| Survival rate of piglets, % | 87.91 | 88.20 | 84.29 | 87.45 | 1.02 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.53 |
| Piglet mean BW, kge | ||||||||
| After cross-fostering | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.74 | 1.76 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.60 |
| At day 7c | 2.78B | 3.13A | 3.01AB | 3.04A | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.33 | < 0.0001 |
| At day 14 | 4.78 | 5.11 | 5.07 | 5.07 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 0.12 |
| At day 21d | 6.85b | 7.07ab | 7.55a | 7.25ab | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Piglet ADG, g/de | ||||||||
| Week 1c | 143B | 191A | 174AB | 179A | 2 | < 0.01 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Week 2 | 280 | 288 | 289 | 285 | 2 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.94 |
| Week 3 | 289 | 300 | 294 | 307 | 2 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.60 |
| Days 1–21 | 243 | 261 | 256 | 260 | 1 | 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.25 |
| Litter weight, kge | ||||||||
| After cross-fostering | 20.48 | 20.34 | 19.46 | 20.04 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
| At day 7 | 31.54 | 32.13 | 31.25 | 31.54 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.88 |
| At day 14 | 51.6 | 51.63 | 50.11 | 50.86 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 0.60 | 0.84 |
| At day 21 | 70.53 | 71.24 | 69.10 | 71.23 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.85 |
SEM standard error of the mean, BW body weight, ADG average daily gain
c, dMeans in the same row with different letters differ significantly; the different lowercase letters represent P < 0.05, and the different capital letters represent P < 0.01
eThe results of piglet mean BW, ADG and litter weight are expressed as Lsmeans
Influence of dietary Met:Lys ratio in lactation diet on composition of colostrum and milk
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | |||
| No. of sowsa | |||||||||
| Fat, % | Colostrum | 5.57 | 6.05 | 5.49 | 5.22 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.82 |
| Milk of day 7 | 7.02 | 7.86 | 7.48 | 7.98 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.45 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 6.94 | 6.93 | 7.45 | 7.27 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.47 | 0.46 | |
| Protein, % | Colostrum | 12.07 | 13.10 | 11.23 | 13.70 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.33 |
| Milk of day 7 | 6.31 | 7.09 | 6.49 | 6.96 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.2 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 6.31 | 6.25 | 6.29 | 6.20 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.9 | |
| Lactose, % | Colostrum | 4.90 | 4.59 | 5.17 | 4.65 | 0.09 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.1 |
| Milk of day 7 | 6.61 | 6.46 | 6.60 | 6.17 | 0.09 | 0.088 | 0.16 | 0.20 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 6.73 | 6.68 | 6.54 | 6.85 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.45 | |
| Total solids content, % | Colostrum | 30.01 | 31.19 | 29.30 | 30.91 | 0.47 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.49 |
| Milk of day 7 | 27.53 | 29.01 | 28.19 | 28.78 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.32 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 27.48 | 27.38 | 27.87 | 27.85 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.6 | |
| Moisture, % | Colostrum | 69.99 | 68.81 | 70.70 | 69.09 | 0.47 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.49 |
| Milk of day 7 | 72.47 | 70.99 | 71.81 | 71.22 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.32 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 72.52 | 72.62 | 72.13 | 72.15 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.6 | |
| Solid not fat, % | Colostrum | 20.75 | 21.41 | 20.09 | 22.11 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 0.38 |
| Milk of day 7 | 16.46 | 17.08 | 16.59 | 16.67 | 0.09 | 0.87 | 0.50 | 0.16 | |
| Milk of day 20 | 16.50 | 16.37 | 16.31 | 16.48 | 0.06 | 0.84 | 0.32 | 0.61 | |
aThe number of samples of sows in each group was more than 9 but not equal; SEM, standard error of the mean
Fig. 1Dietary effect on the concentration of urea nitrogen in plasma. Blood samples were collected from the ear vein of sows at the morning feeding and 2 h later. Data are presented as the means±SEM, n ≥ 10/lactation diet. a-bMeans in the same row with different letters differ significantly, P < 0.05
Effect of dietary Met:Lys ratio in the lactation diet on the levels of methionine metabolites in the blood of sows
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | ||
| No. of sows1 | ||||||||
| At parturition | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L3 | 26.88 | 27.97 | 34.11 | 34.37 | 1.92 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.43 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L3 | 26.78 | 27.40 | 26.82 | 25.47 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.85 |
| Cystine, μmol/L | 10.70 | 9.51 | 10.47 | 7.92 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.39 |
| Taurine, μmol/L3 | 52.2 | 46.1 | 55.7 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.85 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L | 74.58 | 76.77 | 77.77 | 79.34 | 1.52 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 0.55 |
| At day 7 | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L2,3 | 21.96C | 39.57B | 49.63B | 63.84A | 2.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L2,3 | 15.88B | 15.40B | 17.70AB | 19.76A | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cystine, μmol/L2 | 6.58ab | 7.16a | 5.78b | 5.49b | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Taurine, μmol/L3 | 43.3 | 61.1 | 72.7 | 79.9 | 5.2 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L | 55.14 | 53.55 | 55.34 | 54.76 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| At weaning | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L2,3 | 12.21D | 26.48C | 36.55B | 52.99A | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L2,3 | 13.88B | 14.55B | 15.40B | 18.96A | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cystine, μmol/L2 | 3.90ab | 4.11a | 3.40b | 3.34b | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Taurine, μmol/L2,3 | 23.3B | 36.6B | 30.4B | 64.7A | 3.8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L2 | 59.31B | 59.04B | 58.04B | 64.97A | 0.77 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
1The number of samples of sows in each group was more than 9 but not equal; SEM, standard error of the mean
2Means in the same row with different letters differ significantly; the different lowercase letters represent P < 0.05, and the different capital letters represent P < 0.01
3There was a treatment × sampling day interaction for plasma methionine (P < 0.001), homocysteine (P < 0.05) and taurine (P < 0.05) concentrations
Effect of dietary Met:Lys ratio in the lactation diet on the levels of methionine metabolites in the colostrum and milk of sows
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | ||
| No. of sows1 | ||||||||
| Colostrum | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L | 3.28 | 4.69 | 3.48 | 3.20 | 0.42 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L | 25.66 | 25.18 | 38.99 | 35.29 | 2.93 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.46 |
| Cystine, μmol/L | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.26 |
| Taurine, μmol/L3 | 575.7 | 501.7 | 552.8 | 552.4 | 34.7 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.92 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L | 53.06 | 52.72 | 51.88 | 50.23 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.31 |
| Milk at day 7 | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L | 14.18 | 16.30 | 16.13 | 18.56 | 0.74 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.23 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L | 30.39 | 38.19 | 30.62 | 32.99 | 2.33 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.66 |
| Cystine, μmol/L | 2.11 | 2.39 | 2.62 | 2.24 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.64 |
| Taurine, μmol/L3 | 780.4 | 944.7 | 851.9 | 790.4 | 24.7 | 0.70 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L | 45.63 | 47.36 | 47.41 | 50.16 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Milk at day 20 | ||||||||
| Methionine, μmol/L | 18.41 | 18.48 | 16.77 | 16.49 | 0.93 | 0.38 | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Homocysteine, μmol/L2 | 9.58B | 20.46A | 25.01A | 29.38A | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cystine, μmol/L | 2.01 | 3.39 | 3.40 | 2.82 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Taurine, μmol/L2,3 | 801.0b | 965.3a | 927.9ab | 1068.4a | 29.4 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Glutathione, μmol/L | 50.19 | 50.27 | 52.29 | 51.69 | 0.73 | 0.32 | 0.59 | 0.68 |
1The number of samples of sows in each group was more than 9 but not equal; SEM, standard error of the mean
2Means in the same row with different letters differ significantly; the different lowercase letters represent P < 0.05, and the different capital letters represent P < 0.01
3There was a treatment × sampling day interaction trend for the level of taurine in milk (P = 0.074)
Effect of dietary Met:Lys ratio in the lactation diet on oxidative stress parameters of sows
| Items | Met:Lys | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.57 | Linear | Quadratic | Feed | ||
| No. of sows1 | ||||||||
| At parturition | ||||||||
| GSH-Px, U/mL3 | 843.73 | 800.09 | 768.65 | 811.04 | 16.33 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.44 |
| T-AOC, U/mL3 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 0.08 |
| ROS, U/mL | 36.49 | 30.83 | 41.48 | 41.65 | 2.27 | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.30 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/mL | 37.44 | 33.07 | 37.72 | 33.26 | 1.83 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 0.70 |
| TBARS, nmol/mL | 3.08 | 3.1 | 2.81 | 2.71 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.79 |
| At day 7 | ||||||||
| GSH-Px, U/mL2,3 | 672.88B | 811.65A | 763.09A | 621.40B | 16.91 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| T-AOC, U/mL2,3 | 0.30C | 0.58B | 1.00A | 0.50BC | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ROS, U/mL | 34.66 | 32.54 | 39.11 | 38.22 | 1.87 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 0.12 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/mL2 | 50.05a | 43.08ab | 38.47b | 38.78b | 1.60 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| TBARS, nmol/mL2 | 3.82b | 3.78b | 4.51ab | 4.73a | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| At weaning | ||||||||
| GSH-Px, U/mL2,3 | 632.84C | 895.69A | 773.88B | 799.85B | 17.92 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| T-AOC, U/mL2,3 | 0.36B | 0.62B | 1.27A | 1.36A | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ROS, U/mL | 46.20 | 37.92 | 39.79 | 40.64 | 1.79 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.45 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/mL2 | 50.56a | 40.58b | 49.15a | 50.42a | 1.37 | 0.58 | 0.31 | 0.02 |
| TBARS, nmol/mL | 2.47 | 2.24 | 2.67 | 3.65 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.17 |
1The number of samples of sows in each group was more than 9 but not equal; SEM, standard error of the mean;
2Means in the same row with different letters differ significantly; the different lowercase letters represent P < 0.05, and the different capital letters represent P < 0.01;
3There was a treatment × sampling day interaction for plasma GSH-Px and T-AOC concentrations (P < 0.01), and the levels of GSH-Px and T-AOC in plasma at parturition and weaning were significantly higher than those at day 7 (P < 0.001);
GSH-Px glutathione peroxidase, T-AOC total antioxidant capacity, ROS reactive oxygen species; 8-OHdG 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine; TBARS thiobarbituric acid reactive substances
Fig. 2The trend change in homocysteine (Hcy) in plasma along with the lactation process. Blood samples were collected from the ear vein of sows at the morning feeding and 2 h later. Data are presented as the means±SEM, n ≥ 11/lactation diet. A-CMeans in the same row with different letters differ significantly, P < 0.01