| Literature DB >> 31440285 |
Fatemeh Farahmand1, Parvaneh Khorasani2, Mohsen Shahriari3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of a self-care education (SCE) discharge program with telephone follow-ups in managing hypertension (HTN) in older patients.Entities:
Keywords: Discharge Planning; Elderly; Hypertension; Patient Education; Self-Care; Telenursing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31440285 PMCID: PMC6679660 DOI: 10.22122/arya.v15i2.1787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ARYA Atheroscler ISSN: 1735-3955
Self-care education program and telephone follow-ups in the intervention group
| Educational subject | Summary of conversations and the outcome of the initial and final evaluation of the meeting Compliance with self-care recommendations related to in-person education at discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| First telephone call: familiarity with medications | Help questions: | ||
| 1. What have you changed in your diet? | |||
| The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain three changes in his/her diet that are related to blood pressure control. | ||
| -Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| -Review goals: | 2. Explain the amount of salt intake during the last week. | ||
| 1. Identifying and prescribing antihypertensive medications | Evaluation: Patient describes the amount of salt consumed by referring to the relevant principles in the previous class. | ||
| 2. Reporting the amount, frequency, time, and method of taking antihypertensive medication correctly in accordance with the latest prescription | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
| Second telephone call: Appropriate diet | Help questions: | ||
| 1. Explain the amount, timing, and frequency of taking two
consumable medicines. | |||
| The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain the amount, timing, and frequency of taking two consumable medicines referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
| -Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| -Review goals: | 2. Explain the relationship between the hypertensive
medication and its three side effects experienced by the patient. | ||
| 1. Explaining at least three of the principles of appropriate diet in hypertension by simple and complete words | Evaluation: Patient can relate medicinal side effects to the type of hypertensive medication consumed. | ||
| 2. Identifying the four main food groups in the hypertension diet | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
| Third telephone call: Physical activity and weight loss | Help questions: | ||
| 1. Explain at least three main principles of appropriate
diet in hypertension by using own words. | |||
| The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain three main principles of appropriate diet in hypertension referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
| -Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| -Review of goals: | 2. Describe the maximum amount of salt consumed. | ||
| 1. Explaining the type and required duration of physical activity to reduce blood pressure | Evaluation: Patient can describe the maximum amount of salt consumed referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
| 2. Explaining the importance of having physical activity regularly and its relationship with weight loss and blood pressure reduction in their own words | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
| Forth telephone call: Familiarity with hypertension symptoms and complications: | Help question: | ||
| 1. Explain the type and required duration of physical
activity for blood pressure reduction. | |||
| The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain the type and required duration of physical activity for blood pressure reduction referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
| -Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| -Review goals: | 2. Explain the importance of having physical activity
regularly in reduced blood pressure in their own words. | ||
| 1. Explaining at least three symptoms of increased blood pressure in its self | Evaluation: Patient can explain the importance of having physical activity regularly in reduced blood pressure referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
| 2. Explaining at least three symptoms of decreased blood pressure in its self | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
| □ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
| Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
Figure 1Diagram of the study
Demographic and confounding variables in the intervention and control groups at baseline
| Variable | Group | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (n = 28) | Control group (n = 28) | |||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Age (year) | 71.5 ± 5.4 | 69.03 ± 4.9 | p1 = 0.100 | |
| History of hypertension (year) | 9.9 ± 5.9 | 8.80 ± 8.2 | p1 = 0.570 | |
| Body Mass Index | 29.1 ± 4.1 | 28.40 ± 3.1 | p1 = 0.540 | |
|
|
| |||
| Gender | Female | 10 (41.7) | 12 (46.2) | p2 = 0.750 |
| Male | 14 (58.3) | 14 (53.8) | ||
| Marital status | Married | 17 (70.8) | 20 (76.9) | p2 = 0.610 |
| Widowed | 7 (29.2) | 6 (23.1) | ||
| Occupational status | Employed | 2 (8.3) | 4 (15.4) | p2 = 0.860 |
| Retired | 8 (33.3) | 9 (34.6) | ||
| Insurance Recipient | 5 (20.8) | 4 (15.4) | ||
| Housekeeper | 9 (37.6) | 9 (34.6) | ||
| Living status | Alone | 3 (12.5) | 3 (11.5) | p2 = 0.650 |
| With wife | 16 (66.7) | 20 (77.0) | ||
| With children | 5 (20.8) | 3 (11.5) | ||
| Level of Education | Illiterate | 3 (12.5) | 6 (23.1) | p3 = 0.920 |
| pre-high school diploma | 15 (62.5) | 11 (42.3) | ||
| High school diploma | 6 (25.0) | 8 (30.8) | ||
| Academic education | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | ||
| Hospitalization for HTN in the past year | less than once | 16 (66.7) | 20 (76.9) | p3 = 0.460 |
| one to two times | 6 (25.0) | 4 (15.4) | ||
| more than twice | 2 (8.3) | 2 (7.7) | ||
SD: Standard deviation; P1: Independent t-test; P2: Chi-Square test; P3: Mann-Whitney U test
Blood pressure status for intervention and control groups at three stages of the study
| Variable | Group | Time | P1 | P2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (before discharge) | 2 months after discharge | 3 months after discharge | ||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||
| SBP | Intervention group (n = 24) | 153.4 ± 13.7 | 145.7 ± 11.3 | 137.2 ± 9.0 | 0.043 | < 0.001 |
| Control group (n = 26) | 150.5 ± 15.6 | 151.3 ± 14.0 | 153.3 ± 13.7 | |||
| DBP | Intervention group (n = 24) | 87.6 ± 9.3 | 85.7 ± 8.9 | 84.1 ± 8.3 | 0.047 | 0.036 |
| Control group (n = 26) | 88.5 ± 10.5 | 89.4 ± 9.5 | 90.0 ± 7.9 | |||
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SD: Standard deviation
P1: Effect of group; P2: Effect of time;
P-value of less than 0.050 was considered as significant.
Frequency of managed hypertension (normal blood pressure) for the intervention and control groups at three stages of the study
| Group | Time | P2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (before discharge) | 2 months after discharge | 3 months after discharge | ||
| Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | ||
| Intervention group (n = 24) | 8 (30.8) | 7 (26.9) | 6 (23.1) | < 0.001 |
| Control group (n = 26) | 8 (33.3) | 10 (41.7) | 21 (87.5) | 0.470 |
| P1 | 0.76 | 0.27 | < 0.001 | |
P1: McNemar’s test;
P2: Cochran's Q test;
P-value of less than 0.050 was considered as significant.