S K Kannath1, S Mandapalu2, B Thomas3, J Enakshy Rajan3, C Kesavadas3. 1. From the Department of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology (S.K.K., B.T., J.E.R., C.K.), Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India drsanthoshkannath@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology (S.M.), NRI Medical College, Chinakakani, Guntur, Andra Pradesh, India. 3. From the Department of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology (S.K.K., B.T., J.E.R., C.K.), Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging or time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA is used in the detection and characterization of spinal vascular malformations, though inherent trade-offs can affect their overall sensitivity and accuracy. We compared the efficacy of volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted and time-resolved contrast-enhanced images in spinal vascular malformation diagnosis and feeder characterization and assessed whether a combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with spinal vascular malformations (spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, spinal cord arteriovenous malformation, and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula) were prospectively enrolled. MR images were separately analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Both sequences demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 93.5% accuracy for the detection of spinal vascular malformations. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (100% versus 90% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy), however, for the diagnosis of perimedullary arteriovenous fistula, time resolved contrast enhanced MRI was found to perform better than the volumetric T2 sequence (80% versus 60% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy). Both sequences showed equal sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (87%) for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy across all types of spinal vascular malformation. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior or equal to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for feeder identification of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas for both observers (90.9% and 72.7% versus 72.7%), which improved to 90.9% when the sequences were combined. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed better for major and total feeder identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformation (80% versus 60%) and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula (80% versus 60%-80%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of spinal vascular malformation diagnosis, classification, and feeder characterization.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging or time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA is used in the detection and characterization of spinal vascular malformations, though inherent trade-offs can affect their overall sensitivity and accuracy. We compared the efficacy of volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted and time-resolved contrast-enhanced images in spinal vascular malformation diagnosis and feeder characterization and assessed whether a combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with spinal vascular malformations (spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, spinal cord arteriovenous malformation, and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula) were prospectively enrolled. MR images were separately analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Both sequences demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 93.5% accuracy for the detection of spinal vascular malformations. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (100% versus 90% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy), however, for the diagnosis of perimedullary arteriovenous fistula, time resolved contrast enhanced MRI was found to perform better than the volumetric T2 sequence (80% versus 60% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy). Both sequences showed equal sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (87%) for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy across all types of spinal vascular malformation. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior or equal to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for feeder identification of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas for both observers (90.9% and 72.7% versus 72.7%), which improved to 90.9% when the sequences were combined. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed better for major and total feeder identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformation (80% versus 60%) and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula (80% versus 60%-80%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of spinal vascular malformation diagnosis, classification, and feeder characterization.
Authors: Patrick H Luetmer; John I Lane; Julie R Gilbertson; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; John L D Atkinson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.825