Literature DB >> 31439456

Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluations of Meniscal Repairs Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Ryo Kanto1, Motoi Yamaguchi2, Ken Sasaki2, Akio Matsumoto2, Hiroshi Nakayama3, Shinichi Yoshiya3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the healing status of meniscal repair performed concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with our current indication and surgical procedure based on second-look arthroscopic results. Additionally, the significance of the demographic and clinical factors that can potentially influence the healing rate was statistically assessed.
METHODS: Between January 2009 and January 2015, second-look was performed for patients who opted to have tibial screw removal and agreed to have concomitant arthroscopy. The healing status of the repaired meniscus was classified into 3 conditions: healed, incompletely healed, and not healed. In addition, clinical outcomes were evaluated at a minimal 1-year follow-up. The effects of patient factors on the meniscal healing rate were statistically assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 217 knees underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair concomitant with ACL reconstruction, while second-look was performed for 105 knees. The average period from index surgery to second-look was 15.0 months. Clinical evaluation was conducted at a mean of 17 months (12-50 months). Based on the second-look arthroscopic findings, 64 menisci, 22 menisci, and 29 menisci were categorized as healed, incompletely healed, and not healed, respectively. When the not healed condition was defined as failed repair, a Tegner activity score of 8 or more, recurrent instability, tears in the red-white to white-white zones, and time from injury to surgery of 4 months or longer were identified as clinical factors significantly correlated with failure (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal repair in ACL reconstructed knees with expanded indications achieved a healing rate (including incomplete healing) of 75%. Clinical factors such as high sports activity level, recurrent ACL instability, poor vascularity of the repaired site, and long duration from injury to surgery were shown to impair the healing status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅳ, therapeutic study, case series.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31439456     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  4 in total

Review 1.  Blood in the joint: effects of hemarthrosis on meniscus health and repair techniques.

Authors:  L P Lyons; J B Weinberg; J R Wittstein; A L McNulty
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcomes, failure rates and subsequent processing.

Authors:  Yu-Ping Yang; Xiao Ma; Hua An; Xiao-Peng Liu; Ning An; Ying-Fang Ao
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-20

Review 3.  Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation of Healing Rates After Arthroscopic Repair of Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Dai; Xi Leng; Jian Wang; Xiaoqing Hu; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Alex C DiBartola; Alan Rogers; Peter Kurzweil; Michael V Knopp; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.