Literature DB >> 31439369

Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups.

Geert J L H van Leenders1, Charlotte F Kweldam2, Eva Hollemans2, Intan P Kümmerlin2, Daan Nieboer3, Esther I Verhoef2, Sebastiaan Remmers4, Luca Incrocci5, Chris H Bangma4, Theodorus H van der Kwast6, Monique J Roobol4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Grade groups (GGs) are an important parameter for therapeutic decision making in prostate cancer (Pca) patients. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) has an independent prognostic value for disease outcome, but are not included in the GG limiting their clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a proof-of-principle study incorporating CR/IDC in the current GG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All prostate biopsies of 1031 men with screen-detected Pca between 1993 and 2000 were reviewed for the current GG (ranging from 1 to 5) and CR/IDC. The cribriform grade (cGrade) was equal to the GG if CR/IDC was present and GG minus 1 if not. GG1 was cGrade1 if intraductal carcinoma was absent. INTERVENTION: Biopsy review for GG and CR/IDC. A total of 406 patients had received radical prostatectomy (RP), 508 radiotherapy (RT), 108 surveillance, and eight hormonal therapy, and the treatment was unknown for one patient. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis disease-specific survival (DSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after 15.1 yr (interquartile range 10.9-19.7 yr) follow-up were compared using Harrell's C-statistic. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The biopsy GGs were 486 GG1, 310 GG2, 104 GG3, 64 GG4, and 67 GG5; cGrade distributions were 738 cGrade1, 102 cGrade2, 91 cGrade3, 58 cGrade4, and 42 cGrade5. The cGrade had a better discriminative value than the GG for DSS (C-index 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.83 vs 0.76; 0.71-0.82) and MFS (0.79; 0.74-0.84 vs 0.77; 0.72-0.82). The discriminative value for BCRFS after RP and RT was similar for both models. Different diagnostic, such as use of sextant biopsies, and therapeutic strategies in the 1990s are the limitations of this study.
CONCLUSIONS: The cGrade is a simple Pca grade modification with better discriminative values for DSS and MFS than the GG, particularly impacting decision making in men with current GG2 Pca. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Microscopic grading is an important factor for decision making in prostate cancer (Pca) patients. We show that a simple grade modification better predicts Pca outcome and might improve treatment choices.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cribriform; Gleason score; Grade; Intraductal carcinoma; Prostate cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31439369     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  18 in total

1.  Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.

Authors:  Chaoyang Yan; Kazuaki Nakane; Xiangxue Wang; Yao Fu; Haoda Lu; Xiangshan Fan; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi; Jun Xu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Kevin Sandeman; Sami Blom; Ville Koponen; Anniina Manninen; Juuso Juhila; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Ropponen; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 3.  Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Maria Destouni; Andreas C Lazaris; Vasiliki Tzelepi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Clinical significance of IDC-P as predictive factor after intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rihito Aizawa; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Hironori Haga; Kiyonao Nakamura; Takashi Ogata; Takahiro Inoue; Takashi Kobayashi; Shusuke Akamatsu; Takayuki Goto; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.518

6.  Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Esther I Verhoef; Eva Hollemans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zanetti; Renata Zelic; Francesca Giunchi; Jonna Fridfeldt; Jessica Carlsson; Sabina Davidsson; Luca Lianas; Cecilia Mascia; Daniela Zugna; Luca Molinaro; Per Henrik Vincent; Ove Andrén; Lorenzo Richiardi; Olof Akre; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Andreas Pettersson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Theodorus H van der Kwast; David J Grignon; Andrew J Evans; Glen Kristiansen; Charlotte F Kweldam; Geert Litjens; Jesse K McKenney; Jonathan Melamed; Nicholas Mottet; Gladell P Paner; Hemamali Samaratunga; Ivo G Schoots; Jeffry P Simko; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Murali Varma; Anne Y Warren; Thomas M Wheeler; Sean R Williamson; Kenneth A Iczkowski
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.298

9.  Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eva Hollemans; Esther I Verhoef; Chris H Bangma; John Rietbergen; Monique J Roobol; Jozien Helleman; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Eszter Szentirmai; Giovanna Angela Giannico
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.