Literature DB >> 31439258

Can DCE-MRI reduce the number of PI-RADS v.2 false positive findings? Role of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters in prostate lesions characterization.

Giulia Cristel1, Antonio Esposito2, Anna Damascelli3, Alberto Briganti4, Alessandro Ambrosi5, Giorgio Brembilla2, Lisa Brunetti2, Sofia Antunes3, Massimo Freschi6, Francesco Montorsi4, Alessandro Del Maschio2, Francesco De Cobelli2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the potential impact of pharmacokinetic parameters, derived from DCE-MRI analysis, on the diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv.2 classification in prostate lesions characterization.
METHOD: Among patients who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) (January 2016-March 2018) followed by histological evaluation (targeted biopsies/prostatectomy), 103 men were retrospectively selected. For each patient the index lesion was identified and pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp) were assessed. MRI diagnostic performance in the detection of significant tumors [Gleason Score (GS)≥7] was assessed, considering PI-RADS≥3 as positive.
RESULTS: GS ≥ 7 (n = 59) showed higher Ktrans (p < 0.01) and Kep (p = 0.01) compared to GS < 7. At ROC curve analysis, a Ktrans cut-off of 191 × 10-3/min was identified to predict the presence of GS ≥ 7 (AUC:0.75; sensitivity:95%; specificity:61%). Sensitivity and PPV of mpMRI using PI-RADSv.2 were 98% and 61%. Reclassifying PI-RADS≥3 lesions according to Ktrans cut-off, 22 false positives were shifted to true negatives with 3 false negative findings; PPV raised to 79%. Appling Ktrans cut-off to PI-RADS 3 lesions of peripheral zone (n = 18), 12 true negatives, 4 true positives, 2 false positives were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite its high sensitivity prostate mpMRI generates many false positive cases: Ktrans in addition to PIRADS v.2 seems to improve MRI-PPV and may help in avoiding redundant biopsies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion imaging; Prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31439258     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

Review 1.  Arguments against using an abbreviated or biparametric prostate MRI protocol.

Authors:  Felipe B Franco; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

2.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate-Can We Make Better Use of It?

Authors:  Silva Guljaš; Mirta Benšić; Zdravka Krivdić Dupan; Oliver Pavlović; Vinko Krajina; Deni Pavoković; Petra Šmit Takač; Matija Hranić; Tamer Salha
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  The Primacy of High B-Value 3T-DWI Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Bevilacqua; Margherita Mottola; Fabio Ferroni; Alice Rossi; Giampaolo Gavelli; Domenico Barone
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Simultaneous evaluation of perfusion and morphology using GRASP MRI in hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Bo Yun Hur; Robert Grimm; Steven Sourbron; Hersh Chandarana; Yohan Son; Susmita Basak; Kyoung-Bun Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness: a study with Rubidium-82 PET, MRI and Na+/K+-ATPase-density.

Authors:  Mads Ryø Jochumsen; Jens Sörensen; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Jens Randel Nyengaard; Søren Rasmus Palmelund Krag; Jørgen Frøkiær; Michael Borre; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Lars Poulsen Tolbod
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.