Literature DB >> 31439237

Quantification of steatosis in alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Evaluation of four MR techniques versus biopsy.

Claire Boudinaud1, Armand Abergel2, Juliette Joubert-Zakeyh3, Mikael Fontarensky4, Bruno Pereira5, Benoit Chauveau6, Jean Marc Garcier6, Pascal Chabrot4, Louis Boyer4, Benoît Magnin6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the growing prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome, the management of hepatic steatosis, especially its quantification, is a major issue. We assessed the quantification of liver steatosis using four different MR methods, in order to determine the one that is best correlated with the reference method which consists of histological measurement by liver biopsy.
METHOD: Seventy-one successive patients requiring liver biopsy for acute or chronic liver disease were enrolled prospectively between March 2017 and March 2018, 11 were excluded and 60 were reported. Liver MR (1.5 T) was organised in order to be performed the same day, using four different steatosis quantification techniques (3-echo MRI, 6-echo MRI, 11-echo MRI and MR Spectroscopy). Quantitative histological and imaging data were compared. In a secondary analysis, we studied the possible influence of alcohol drinking, hepatic iron overload, and the presence of liver fibrosis.
RESULTS: All four MR techniques were found to have excellent correlations with the histological measurements: 3-echo MRI (r = 0.852, p < 0.001), 6-echo MRI (r = 0.819, p < 0.001), 11-echo MRI (r = 0.818, p < 0.001) and MR Spectroscopy (r = 0,812, p < 0,001). Interestingly, we also found that the presence of alcohol consumption, iron overload and fibrosis did not interfere with measurements, whichever technique was used.
CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of hepatic steatosis, our study showed very good correlations of all four MR techniques with the histological standard. There was no confounding factor in a representative group of patients with associated liver conditions such as alcohol consumption, fibrosis and iron overload, for each technique. All four MR techniques may be used in daily practice.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fatty liver; Histological techniques; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spectrum analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31439237     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous hepatic iron and fat quantification with dual-energy CT in a rabbit model of coexisting iron and fat.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Jing Ye; Chang Liu; Hongru Jia; Jun Sun; Jun Ling; Martin Prince; Chang Li; Xianfu Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Unenhanced computed tomography for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis with low tube potential protocol.

Authors:  Dong Kyun Kim; Joon-Il Choi; Yunjung Choi; Seo Yeon Youn; Hokun Kim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Hepatorenal index for grading liver steatosis with concomitant fibrosis.

Authors:  Fabio Lucio Stahlschmidt; Jean Rodrigo Tafarel; Carla Martinez Menini-Stahlschmidt; Cristina Pellegrino Baena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Liver fat accumulation measured by high-speed T2-corrected multi-echo magnetic resonance spectroscopy can predict risk of cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Wei-Ke Zeng; Guang-Zi Shi; Ming Gao; Meng-Zhu Wang; Jun Shen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.