| Literature DB >> 31438129 |
Shruthi Manas1, Lindsay E Young2, Kayo Fujimoto3, Amy Franklin1, Sahiti Myneni1.
Abstract
Unhealthy behaviors, such as tobacco use, increase individual health risk while also creating a global economic burden on the healthcare system. Social ties have been seen as an important, yet complex factor, to sustain abstinence from these modifiable risk behaviors. However, the underlying social mechanisms are still opaque and poorly understood. Digital health communities provide opportunities to understand social dependencies of behavior change because peer interactions in these platforms are digitized. In this paper, we present a novel approach that integrates theories of behavior change and Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) to understand structural dependencies between users of an online community and the behavior change techniques that are manifested in their communication using an affiliation network. Results indicate population specific traits in terms of individuals' engagement in peer communication embed behavior change techniques in online social settings. Implications for personalized health promotion technologies are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Health Communities; Social networks; Tobacco cessation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31438129 PMCID: PMC7656969 DOI: 10.3233/SHTI190430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform ISSN: 0926-9630
Figure 1.Parameterized Local Configurations among QuitNet Users a and j and Behavior Change Techniques k, l, m, and n. The parameters represent the following processes: (a) the likelihood of QuitNet users mentioning a behavior change technique, (b) the likelihood of QuitNet users mentioning multiple behavior change techniques, (c) the likelihood of male QuitNet users mentioning a behavior change technique, (d) the likelihood of male QuitNet users mentioning multiple behavior change techniques, (e) the likelihood of male QuitNet users mentioning the same behavior change technique, (f) the likelihood of older QuitNet users mentioning a behavior change technique, and (g) the likelihood of older QuitNet users mentioning multiple behavior change techniques.
Illustration of QuitNet Messages and Assigned Behavior Change Technique
| Quit message | Assigned technique |
|---|---|
| To tell you the truth, it’s a new experience for me NOT to cough (I smoked for 38 or so years - YUK!). Good luck to you. | Natural consequences |
| Wow!!! xyxx is correct. You control your attitude. Deep breathing, chew gum, take a walk (or maybe a hike:-) Hang in there. This is not easy, your an addict. | Repetetion and substitution |
| At this point in your Quit it may be best to look at more immediate gains such as money saved or improved self esteem or better health. My dollar savings are $5,293 and that is real and for now. My life saved is an unrealized 15 weeks and 20 minutes that may never happen. | Comparison of outcomes |
Descriptive Statistics of Users and the Behavior Change Techniques within the QuitNet Forum
| Behavior Change Techniques | Full user Sample | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outcomes | 70(55) | 22(61) | 48(53) |
| Feedback and monitoring | 67(53) | 19(53) | 48(53) |
| Reward and threat | 58(46) | 17(47) | 41(45) |
| Social support | 47(37) | 15(42) | 32(35) |
| Self belief | 42(33) | 10(28) | 32(35) |
| Natural consequence | 40(32) | 10(28) | 30(33) |
| Comparison of behavior | 34(27) | 5(14) | 29(32) |
| Goals and planning | 17(13) | 3(8) | 14(15) |
Figure 2.The network structure of mentions of behavior change techniques among 126 members of QuitNet as a 2-mode cessation technique affiliation network: 2014 and 2015.
Exponential Random Graph Model of 2-Mode QuitNet User Affiliation Network with Behavior Change Techniques with Gender Modeled as Covariates
| Parameter | ML Estimate | Standard Error(SE) | t-ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edge density | −0.26 | 1.01 | −0.01 |
| Alternating k-star | −0.3 | 0.6 | −0.02 |
| Gender edge density | −1.23* | 0.6 | −0.02 |
| Age edge density | 0.004 | 0.01 | −0.02 |
| Gender based expansiveness | −0.09 | 0.2 | −0.04 |
| Gender homophily | 0.10* | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Age based expansiveness | 0.0001 | 0.003 | −0.04 |