Literature DB >> 31438078

Network Analysis of Citation in Hypertension Clinical Guidelines.

Youjin Park1, Hyung Woo Kim2, Seng Chan You3, George Hripcsak4,5, Han Eol Cho6,7, Ji Hyuk Han8, Seo Jeong Shin1, Rae Woong Park1,3.   

Abstract

Recently the two most influential clinical guideline were published for diagnosing and treating hypertension in US and Europe: 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) Guideline. Though both of them have most in common, the differences in details between guidelines have confused many clinicians in the world. Because guidelines were evidence- based literature, through the analysis of articles cited in guidelines, these similarities and differences could be explained. Bibliometric analysis is a method of quantifying the contents of literature to analyze literature. So using the bibliometric analysis including co-citation network analysis, articles cited in guideline were analyzed. As a result, we figured out that bibliometrics can analyze the influence of the countries, authors and studies on the guidelines, which might affect on the similarities and the differences between both guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Guideline; Hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31438078     DOI: 10.3233/SHTI190378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  1 in total

1.  Trends in Worldwide Research in Hypertension Over the Period 1999-2018: A Bibliometric Study.

Authors:  Patrick Devos; Joël Ménard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 10.190

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.