Literature DB >> 31438009

Differences Between What Is Said During the Consultation and What Is Recorded in the Electronic Health Record.

Virginie Lacroix-Hugues1,2, Sarah Azincot-Belhassen1, Pascal Staccini3, David Darmon1.   

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can be used for research but this raises the problem of data quality.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of the information recorded in an EHR by a general practitioner (GP) during a regular office consultation.
METHOD: 191 dialogs between the GP and patient were recorded and translated into the International Classification of Primary Care Second edition (ICPC-2) codes. Written information of the corresponding EHR was extracted and coded for comparison.
RESULTS: The primary reason for the consultation was recorded in the EHR in 41.2% of the cases and the diagnosis in 44.1% of the cases. Diagnoses noted in the EHR were less often communicated to the patients than the primary reasons (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: There is a loss of information between the dialog during a consultation and what is reported in the EHR. Consequences in terms of continuity and safety of care can be expected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Health Records; Information Management; Self Report

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31438009     DOI: 10.3233/SHTI190308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of Using Electronic Health Records for Cascade Monitoring and Cost Estimates in Implementation Science Studies in the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions.

Authors:  Tyra Dark; Kit N Simpson; Sitaji Gurung; Amy L Pennar; Marshall Chew; Sylvie Naar
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.