| Literature DB >> 31436070 |
Chenmeng Li1,2,3, Peng Liu1,3, Pengfei Shao1,3, Jing Pei4,5, Yingrui Li1,3, Timothy M Pawlik6, Edward W Martin6, Ronald X Xu1,2.
Abstract
We propose a handheld projective imaging device for orthotopic projection of near-infrared fluorescence images onto target biological tissue at visible wavelengths without any additional visual aid. The device integrates a laser diode light source module, a camera module, a projector, an ultrasonic distance sensor, a Raspberry Pi single-board computer, and a battery module in a rugged handheld unit. It is calibrated at the detected working distance for seamless coregistration between fluorescence emission and projective imaging at the target tissue site. The proposed device is able to achieve a projection resolution higher than 314 μm and a planar projection bias less than 1 mm at a projection field of view of 58 × 108 mm2 and a working distance of 27 cm. Technical feasibility for projective imaging is verified in an ex vivo model of chicken breast tissue using indocyanine green as a fluorescence agent. Clinical utility for image-guided surgery is demonstrated in a clinical trial where sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients are identified and resected under the guidance of projective imaging. Our ex vivo and in vivo experiments imply the clinical utility of deploying the proposed device for image-guided surgical interventions in resource-limited settings.Entities:
Keywords: handheld; near-infrared fluorescence imaging; projective imaging; sentinel lymph node; surgical navigation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31436070 PMCID: PMC6983473 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.8.080503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1A handheld projective device for intraoperative NIRF imaging: (a) schematic design of the projective imaging device, (b) photographic image of the working prototype, (c) illustration of the projection bias induced at different working distances, and (d) projective bias of the device before and after calibration.
Fig. 2System resolution and sensitivity test: resolutions of (a) fluorescence imaging and (b) projective imaging tested by a 1951 USAF resolution target, (c) fluorescence image of ICG samples at different concentrations, and (d) plot of versus .
Fig. 3Demonstration of the projection-guided SLN resection procedure in a chicken breast tissue model ex vivo. (a), (b) Tissue model observed by the projective navigation system before and after the bolus injection of ICG. (c) Fluorescence marked area found under the guidance of projective imaging. (d) Projective fluorescence imaging of the surgical site and the resected tissue sample. (e)–(g) Top and side views of the tissue sample show complete removal of fluorescence marked area.
Fig. 4SLN resection surgery under the guidance of the portable projective navigation system: (a) surgery under the guidance of the portable projective navigation system, (b) lymph vessel observed by the projective navigation system after ICG injection, (c) SLN observed by the projective navigation system during resection, and (d) resected SLN.