Literature DB >> 31435750

Now you see me, now you don't: detecting sexual objectification through a change blindness paradigm.

Luca Andrighetto1, Fabrizio Bracco2, Carlo Chiorri2, Michele Masini2, Marcello Passarelli3, Tommaso Francesco Piccinno2.   

Abstract

The goal of this work is to provide evidence for the cognitive objectification of sexualized targets via a change blindness paradigm. Since sexual objectification involves a fragmented perception of the target in which individuating features (i.e., the face) have less information potential than sexualized features (i.e., body parts), we hypothesized that changes in faces of sexualized targets would be detected with less accuracy than changes in faces of nonsexualized targets. Conversely, we expected that changes in body parts would be detected with higher accuracy for sexualized than nonsexualized targets. These hypotheses were supported by the results of two studies that employed a change blindness task in which stimuli with changes both to faces and bodies of sexualized and nonsexualized images were presented. Unexpectedly, the hypothesized effects emerged both for female and male targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Change blindness; Information potential; Objectifying gaze; Sexual objectification

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31435750     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00927-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  17 in total

1.  Changing faces: a detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.

Authors:  T Ro; C Russell; N Lavie
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; R A Rensink; J J Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The body-inversion effect.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Valerie E Stone; Senia Bozova; James Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

4.  Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: the sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis.

Authors:  Philippe Bernard; Sarah J Gervais; Jill Allen; Sophie Campomizzi; Olivier Klein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-04-03

5.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.

Authors:  G W McConkie; C B Currie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Facial expression and emotion.

Authors:  P Ekman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1993-04

8.  Change blindness.

Authors:  D J Simons; D T Levin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Understanding the mechanisms behind the sexualized-body inversion hypothesis: The role of asymmetry and attention biases.

Authors:  Carlotta Cogoni; Andrea Carnaghi; Aleksandra Mitrovic; Helmut Leder; Carlo Fantoni; Giorgia Silani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Sexual OBjectification and EMotion database: A free stimulus set and norming data of sexually objectified and non-objectified female targets expressing multiple emotions.

Authors:  Daniela Ruzzante; Bianca Monachesi; Noemi Orabona; Jeroen Vaes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.