Literature DB >> 31435672

Navigated Intraoperative 2-Dimensional Ultrasound in High-Grade Glioma Surgery: Impact on Extent of Resection and Patient Outcome.

Alessandro Moiraghi1, Francesco Prada2,3,4, Alberto Delaidelli5,6, Ramona Guatta1, Adrien May1, Andrea Bartoli1, Marco Saini2, Alessandro Perin2, Thomas Wälchli1,7,8,9,10, Shahan Momjian1, Philippe Bijlenga1, Karl Schaller1, Francesco DiMeco2,11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maximizing extent of resection (EOR) and reducing residual tumor volume (RTV) while preserving neurological functions is the main goal in the surgical treatment of gliomas. Navigated intraoperative ultrasound (N-ioUS) combining the advantages of ultrasound and conventional neuronavigation (NN) allows for overcoming the limitations of the latter.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time NN combining ioUS and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on maximizing EOR in glioma surgery compared to standard NN.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 60 cases operated on for supratentorial gliomas: 31 operated under the guidance of N-ioUS and 29 resected with standard NN. Age, location of the tumor, pre- and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), EOR, RTV, and, if any, postoperative complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The rate of gross total resection (GTR) in NN group was 44.8% vs 61.2% in N-ioUS group. The rate of RTV > 1 cm3 for glioblastomas was significantly lower for the N-ioUS group (P < .01). In 13/31 (42%), RTV was detected at the end of surgery with N-ioUS. In 8 of 13 cases, (25.8% of the cohort) surgeons continued with the operation until complete resection. Specificity was greater in N-ioUS (42% vs 31%) and negative predictive value (73% vs 54%). At discharge, the difference between pre- and postoperative KPS was significantly higher for the N-ioUS (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The use of an N-ioUS-based real-time has been beneficial for resection in noneloquent high-grade glioma in terms of both EOR and neurological outcome, compared to standard NN. N-ioUS has proven usefulness in detecting RTV > 1 cm3.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extent of resection; Gliomas; High-grade gliomas; Intraoperative ultrasound; Neuronavigation; Patient outcome; Residual tumor volume

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31435672     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative ultrasound techniques for cerebral gliomas resection: usefulness and pitfalls.

Authors:  Alessandro Moiraghi; Johan Pallud
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

Review 2.  Application of Multiparametric Intraoperative Ultrasound in Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Ji Shi; Ye Zhang; Bing Yao; Peixin Sun; Yuanyuan Hao; Haozhe Piao; Xi Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Current Limitations of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Tumor Surgery.

Authors:  Andrej Šteňo; Ján Buvala; Veronika Babková; Adrián Kiss; David Toma; Alexander Lysak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Intraoperative Ultrasound: Emerging Technology and Novel Applications in Brain Tumor Surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva; Gianluca Ferini; Sofia Musso; Giuseppe Salvaggio; Maria Angela Pino; Rosa Maria Gerardi; Lara Brunasso; Roberta Costanzo; Federica Paolini; Rina Di Bonaventura; Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana; Francesca Graziano; Paolo Palmisciano; Gianluca Scalia; Silvana Tumbiolo; Massimo Midiri; Domenico Gerardo Iacopino; Rosario Maugeri
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Advantages of Using 3D Intraoperative Ultrasound and Intraoperative MRI in Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Hou; Jie Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Hou; Ye Li; Qiongge Li; Yang Yu; Jie Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Safe surgery for glioblastoma: Recent advances and modern challenges.

Authors:  Jasper Kees Wim Gerritsen; Marike Lianne Daphne Broekman; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Philippe Schucht; Brian Vala Nahed; Mitchel Stuart Berger; Arnaud Jean Pierre Edouard Vincent
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Intraoperative B-Mode Ultrasound Guided Surgery and the Extent of Glioblastoma Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fatih Incekara; Marion Smits; Linda Dirven; Eelke M Bos; Rutger K Balvers; Iain K Haitsma; Joost W Schouten; Arnaud J P E Vincent
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Feasibility, Safety and Impact on Overall Survival of Awake Resection for Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial IDH-Wildtype Glioblastomas in Adults.

Authors:  Alessandro Moiraghi; Alexandre Roux; Sophie Peeters; Jean-Baptiste Pelletier; Marwan Baroud; Bénédicte Trancart; Catherine Oppenheim; Emmanuèle Lechapt; Chiara Benevello; Eduardo Parraga; Pascale Varlet; Fabrice Chrétien; Edouard Dezamis; Marc Zanello; Johan Pallud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 10.  Neurosurgery for brain metastasis from breast cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Tomita; Kazuhiko Kurozumi; Kentaro Fujii; Yosuke Shimazu; Isao Date
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.