| Literature DB >> 31435551 |
Masatoshi Morimoto1, Toshinori Sakai1, Tsuyoshi Goto2, Kosuke Sugiura1, Hiroaki Manabe1, Fumitake Tezuka1, Kazuta Yamashita1, Yoichiro Takata1, Takashi Chikawa1, Koichi Sairyo1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have allowed early diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis (LS). However, few outpatient clinics are equipped with such imaging apparatuses and must rely on plain radiographs for the diagnosis of LS. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify how accurately fracture lines can be detected on plain radiographs in patients with LS.Entities:
Keywords: low back pain; lumbar spine; pediatric stress fracture; spondylolysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 31435551 PMCID: PMC6690120 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Spine Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2432-261X
Figure 1.A reconstructed CT scan and plain radiographs for a 16-year-old boy with early spondylolysis. Staging of the fracture line was based on CT findings using reverse-gantry angles on the plane parallel to the pars interarticularis. (A) An oblique-axial CT scan shows a fissure-like hairline fracture in the pars interarticularis (arrow). (B-D) Plain radiographs including anteroposterior, lateral (B), dynamic lateral views (C) and oblique views (D), on which the fracture line is barely discernible.
Figure 2.A reconstructed CT scan and plain radiographs for a 16-year-old boy with progressive spondylolysis. (A) An oblique-axial CT scan shows an obvious fracture line in the pars interarticularis (arrow). (B-D) Plain radiographs including anteroposterior, lateral (B), dynamic lateral views (C) on which the fracture line is not detectable, but dynamic lateral views (C) and oblique views (D), on which the fracture line is barely discernible.
Figure 3.A reconstructed CT scan and plain radiographs of a 15-year-old boy with terminal spondylolysis. (A) An oblique-axial CT scan shows pseudoarthrotic changes in the pars interarticularis (arrow). (B-D) Plain radiographs including anteroposterior, lateral (B), dynamic lateral views (C) and oblique views (D), on which fracture lines are clearly identified (arrow heads).
Distribution of Lumbar Spinal Level.
| Level | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| L3 | 1 | 1.1 |
| L4 | 24 | 27.3 |
| L5 | 63 | 71.6 |
| Stage | ||
| Early | 44 | 50 |
| Progressive | 24 | 27.3 |
| Terminal | 20 | 22.7 |
Diagnostic Rate of Each Stage of Lumbar Spondylolysis Using Plain X-ray Films.
| Stage | Reliability | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early [n (%) ] | Progressive [n (%) ] | Terminal [n (%) ] | Total [n (%) ] | Inter-rater | Intra-rater | ||||||
| 2-views | 5 | (11.4) | 13 | (54.2) | 17 | (85.0) | 35 | (39.8) | 0.775 | 0.864 | |
| 4-views | 9 | (20.5) | 18 | (75.0) | 20 | (100.0) | 47 | (53.4) | 0.864 | 0.909 | |
| 4-D-views | 9 | (20.5) | 17 | (70.8) | 20 | (100.0) | 46 | (52.3) | 0.841 | 0.909 | |
| 6-views | 10 | (22.7) | 19 | (79.2) | 20 | (100.0) | 49 | (55.7) | 0.886 | 0.888 | |