| Literature DB >> 31435385 |
Nora Veri1, Emilda As1, Cut Mutiah1, Irma Seriana2, Risnati Malinda3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the effects of green tea in inhibiting uterine atrophy and vascular changes due to the use of depot medroxy progesterone acetate (DMPA).Entities:
Keywords: Contraception; DMPA; Endometrium; Green tea; Tunica adventitia
Year: 2018 PMID: 31435385 PMCID: PMC6694920 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Figure 1Thickness of endometrium in the control and experimental groups. Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; ap < 0.05 compared to the control group; DMPA: depot medroxy progesterone acetate group; DMPA + GT1: DMPA group treated with the first dose of extract; DMPA + GT2: DMPA group treated with the second dose of extract; DMPA + GT3: DMPA group treated with the third dose of extract; μm: micrometre.
Thickness of tunica intima and tunica media in the control and experimental groups.
| Layer | Control | DMPA | DMPA + GT1 | DMPA + GT2 | DMPA + GT3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intima (μm) | 170.095 ± 8.901 | 139.843 ± 18.935 | 156.639 ± 14.973 | 158.111 ± 7.921 | 157.760 ± 18.823 |
| Media (μm) | 179.835 ± 8.509 | 173.900 ± 5.384 | 176.395 ± 6.745 | 176.869 ± 4.946 | 176.948 ± 7.344 |
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. There were no significant differences between groups. DMPA: depot medroxy progesterone acetate group; DMPA + GT1: DMPA treated with the first dose of extract group; DMPA + GT2: DMPA treated with the second dose of extract group; DMPA + GT3: DMPA treated with the third dose of extract group; μm: micrometre.
Thickness of myometrium and perimetrium in the control and experimental groups.
| Layer | Control | DMPA | DMPA + GT1 | DMPA + GT2 | DMPA + GT3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myometrium (μm) | 181.007 ± 4.911 | 175.122 ± 8.908 | 176.230 ± 7.557 | 179.502 ± 8.488 | 178.191 ± 1.485 |
| Perimetrium (μm) | 180.969 ± 6.895 | 170.870 ± 7.098 | 175.806 ± 7.330 | 178.068 ± 3.298 | 179.710 ± 7.802 |
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. There were no significant differences between groups. DMPA: depot medroxy progesterone acetate group; DMPA + GT1: DMPA treated with the first dose of extract group; DMPA + GT2: DMPA treated with the second dose of extract group; DMPA + GT3: DMPA treated with the third dose of extract group; μm: micrometre.
Figure 2Thickness of tunica adventitia in the control and experimental groups. Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; ap < 0.05 compared to the control group; bp < 0.05 compared to the DMPA group; DMPA: depot medroxy progesterone acetate group; DMPA + GT1: DMPA group treated with the first dose of extract; DMPA + GT2: DMPA group treated with the second dose of extract; DMPA + GT3: DMPA group treated with the third dose of extract; μm: micrometre.
Figure 3The number of endothelial cells in the control and experimental groups. Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; ap < 0.05 compared to the control group; bp < 0.05 compared to the DMPA group; cp < 0.05 compared to the DMPA group treated with the first dose of extract; dp < 0.05 compared to the DMPA group treated with the second dose of extract; DMPA: depot medroxy progesterone acetate group; DMPA + GT1: DMPA treated with the first dose of extract group; DMPA + GT2: DMPA treated with the second dose of extract group; DMPA + GT3: DMPA treated with the third dose of extract group.