| Literature DB >> 31435359 |
Hany M Elgohary1, Soad Kh Al Jaouni2, Samy A Selim3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Nigella sativa oil, ultrasound, and moist-exposed burn ointment (MEBO) have been suggested as noninvasive treatments for a number of inflammatory conditions and to accelerate wound healing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of pulsed and continuous modes of ultrasound either alone or through phonophoresis, with N. sativa oil, or MEBO ointment in the treatment of chemical burns.Entities:
Keywords: Burn; Nigella sativa oil; Pulsed phonophoresis; Ultrasound; Wound
Year: 2018 PMID: 31435359 PMCID: PMC6694951 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Mean and standard deviation (confidence interval 95%) for WSA before and after treatment in all groups.
| Mean, standard deviation, and p-value for WSA before and after the treatment (cm2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 days | 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | |
| Group A | 14.26 ± 0.24 | 13.72 ± 0.28 | 12.84 ± 0.57 | 11.7 ± 0.54 |
| Group B | 14.14 ± 0.34 | 13.64 ± 0.46 | 13.04 ± 0.59 | 11.96 ± 0.74 |
| Group C | 14.4 ± 0.26 | 13.2 ± 0.11 | 11.68 ± 0.19 | 10.52 ± 0.28 |
| Group D | 14.08 ± 0.53 | 13.36 ± 0.26 | 11.36 ± 0.48 | 9.52 ± 0.38 |
| Group E | 14.14 ± 0.28 | 13.14 ± 0.94 | 12.2 ± 0.91 | 11.1 ± 1.13 |
| Group F | 14.28 ± 0.54 | 13.88 ± 0.61 | 13.42 ± 0.93 | 10.18 ± 0.26 |
| Group G | 14.18 ± 0.28 | 14.1 ± 0.20 | 14 ± 0.16 | 13.9 ± 0.19 |
WSA: wound surface area.
Statistically significant.
Mean difference (confidence interval 95%) between all groups in the study after 7, 14, and 21 days.
| Groups and time | Mean difference (confidence interval 95%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 0 days | 7 days | 0.54000 |
| 14 days | 1.42000 | ||
| 21 days | 2.56000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 0.88000 | |
| 21 days | 2.02000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 1.14000 | |
| Group B | 0 days | 7 days | 0.50000 |
| 14 days | 1.10000 | ||
| 21 days | 2.18000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 0.60000 | |
| 21 days | 1.68000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 1.08000 | |
| Group C | 0 days | 7 days | 1.22000 |
| 14 days | 2.70000 | ||
| 21 days | 3.86000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 1.48000 | |
| 21 days | 2.64000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 1.16000 | |
| Group D | 0 days | 7 days | 0.72000 |
| 14 days | 2.72000 | ||
| 21 days | 4.56000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 2.00000 | |
| 21 days | 3.84000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 1.84000 | |
| Group E | 0 days | 7 days | 1.00000 |
| 14 days | 1.94000 | ||
| 21 days | 3.04000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 0.94000 | |
| 21 days | 2.04000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 1.10000 | |
| Group F | 0 days | 7 days | 0.40000 |
| 14 days | 0.86000 | ||
| 21 days | 4.10000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 0.46000 | |
| 21 days | 3.70000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 3.24000 | |
| Group G | 0 days | 7 days | 0.08000 |
| 14 days | 0.18000 | ||
| 21 days | 0.28000 | ||
| 7 days | 14 days | 0.10000 | |
| 21 days | 0.20000 | ||
| 14 days | 21 days | 0.10000 | |
Statistically significant.
Percentage improvement in wound surface area in all groups.
| Percentage improvement in all groups (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | |
| Group A | 3.8 | 6.4 | 8.9 |
| Group B | 3.5 | 4.4 | 8.3 |
| Group C | 8.5 | 11.3 | 9.9 |
| Group D | 5.1 | 14.9 | 16.2 |
| Group E | 7.1 | 7.2 | 9 |
| Group F | 2.8 | 3.3 | 14.2 |
| Group G | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 |