| Literature DB >> 31435346 |
Lucky L Nwidu1, Yibala I Oboma2, Ekramy Elmorsy3, Wayne G Carter4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Natural antioxidant products are gaining popularity as treatments for various pathological liver injuries. Musanga cecropioides (Urticaceae) leaf extract is used in ethnomedicine for the management of jaundice and other hepatic ailments in Ibibio, Nigeria. This study evaluated the hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of M. cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf (MCHL) extract against carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced hepatotoxicity in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatoprotection; Hepatotoxicity; Histopathology; Musanga cecropioides leaf; Oxidative stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 31435346 PMCID: PMC6694957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Phytochemical constituents of Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf extracts.
| Phytochemicals | Test | Observations | Inference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | 2 mL of MCHL extract + 2 mL of Dragendoff reagent | Dark orange precipitate | + |
| Saponins | 2 mL of extract shaken vigorously to observe the reaction | Persistent froth unbroken upon standing | ++ |
| Anthraquinone | 2 mL of extract + 10 mL of benzene, followed by the addition of 5 mL of 10% ammonia solution to the filtrate | Presence of reddish colour | − |
| Tannins | 2 mL of MCHL extract + FeCl3 | Resultant solution turns woolly brown | + |
| Flavonoid | 2 mL of MCHL extract + 2 mL of 10% lead acetate | Yellowish green precipitate | + |
| Cardiac glycosides | 2 mL of MCHL extract mixed with 2 mL of chloroform + CH2SO4 | Deep reddish-brown colour at the interface and a steroid ring | + |
(+) to (++) = detected in scant to moderate quantities.
MCHL: Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf.
The effect of Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf extracts on CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity, as indicated by haematological indices.
| Parameter | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCV (%) | 50 ± 6.7 | 40 ± 9.8 | 45 ± 3.0 | 42 ± 9.1 | 44 ± 6.1 | 43 ± 5.1 |
| Hb (g/dl) | 14 ± 1.7 | 12 ± 2.7 | 14 ± 1.0 | 13 ± 2.0 | 12 ± 2.8 | 12 ± 1.5 |
| WBC (×103 cells/μL) | 13 ± 4.0 | 6.7 ± 2.3a | 6.9 ± 2.5a | 12 ± 4.1 | 12 ± 1.5 | 11 ± 2.3 |
| PLT (×103 cells/μL) | 1002 ± 290 | 323 ± 361 | 325 ± 301 | 458 ± 226 | 734 ± 673 | 273 ± 178 |
| RBC (×106 cells/μL) | 8.0 ± 1.0 | 6.5 ± 1.9 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 1.7 | 7.3 ± 0.9 | 7.5 ± 1.0 |
| MCV (%) | 62 ± 2.5 | 59 ± 3.6 | 59 ± 3.4 | 58 ± 2.6 | 60 ± 5.9 | 57 ± 3.1 |
| MCH (pg) | 18 ± 0.9 | 17 ± 1.5 | 17 ± 1.4 | 18 ± 2.6 | 16 ± 3.0 | 16 ± 2.3 |
| MCHC (g/dl) | 28 ± 0.7 | 30 ± 1.7 | 29 ± 1.2 | 31 ± 4.1 | 29 ± 0.8 | 29 ± 1.1 |
| NEU (%) | 38 ± 8.2 | 51 ± 8.0 | 44 ± 12 | 56 ± 11a | 37 ± 8.3 | 45 ± 13 |
| LYM (%) | 63 ± 8.7 | 42 ± 7.1 | 48 ± 13 | 39 ± 13a | 56 ± 8.8 | 49 ± 1.5 |
| MEB (%) | 4.7 ± 1.6 | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 7.5 ± 2.9 | 5.8 ± 2.8 | 7.0 ± 2.9 | 6.7 ± 2.5 |
Values represent mean ± SEM, n = 6. Results are displayed relative to positive control values; ap < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA. Group A received 0.2 mL/kg distilled water; B received CCl4 1 mL/kg; C received 70.7 mg/kg MCHL extract + 1 mL CCl4; D received 140.4 mg/kg MCHL extract + 1 mL CCl4; E received 282.8 mg/kg MCHL extract + 1 mL CCl4; G received 100 mg/kg silymarin.
Abbreviations: PCV: packed cell volume, Hb: haemoglobin, WBC: white blood cells, PLT: platelets, RBC: red blood cells, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular haemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, NEU: neutrophils, LYM: lymphocytes; MEBs: monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils.
Effect of MCHL extract on biochemical parameters.
| Treatment | Dose | TP | ALT | AST | ALP | ALB | CBIL | TBIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight | (mg/kg) | (g/dl) | (IU/L) | (IU/L) | (IU/L) | (g/dL) | (mg/dL) | (mg/dL) |
| Control | 0.0 | 17.7 ± 0.7 | 52.3 ± 2.4 | 41.7 ± 3.8 | 56.7 ± 1.2 | 8.6 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 16.7 ± 0.9 |
| Positive | 1 mL/kg CCl4 | 13.6 ± 0.03∗∗∗ | 102.9 ± 1.1∗∗∗ | 116.7 ± 0.9∗∗∗ | 91.0 ± 3.2∗∗∗ | 3.7 ± 0.3∗∗∗ | 31.3 ± 0.2∗∗∗ | 44.0 ± 0.6∗∗∗ |
| Control | ||||||||
| MCHL extract | CCl4 + 70.7 | 17.8 ± 0.7∗∗∗ | 67.3 ± 0.3∗∗∗ | 62.6 ± 0.8∗∗∗ | 66.0 ± 1.2∗∗∗ | 8.3 ± 0.7∗∗∗ | 17.0 ± 1.1∗∗∗ | 22.0 ± 0.9∗∗∗ |
| CCl4 + 141.4 | 18.2 ± 0.3∗∗∗ | 43.1 ± 1.7∗∗∗ | 30.2 ± 1.8∗∗∗ | 55.3 ± 3.0∗∗∗ | 8.2 ± 0.2∗∗∗ | 16.5 ± 0.2∗∗∗ | 20.2 ± 0.6∗∗∗ | |
| CCl4 + 282.8 | 16.2 ± 0.2∗ | 93.1 ± 1.7 | 100.2 ± 1.6 | 82.2 ± 3.9 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 28.8 ± 2.0 | 42.9 ± 3.1 | |
| Silymarin | CCl4 + 100 | 16.4 ± 0.3∗ | 53.3 ± 0.1∗∗∗ | 53.7 ± 0.3∗∗∗ | 55.0 ± 2.6∗∗∗ | 7.3 ± 0.6∗∗∗ | 10.2 ± 0.1∗∗∗ | 17.2 ± 0.6∗∗∗ |
Values represent means ± SEM, n = 6. Significant results of extracts and pure drug are displayed relative to positive control values; and positive control displayed relative to healthy (negative) control; results with significant changes from controls are marked with asterisks.
For significance: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA.
Abbreviations: MCHL extract, Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic extract; TP: total protein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALB: albumin; CBIL: conjugated bilirubin; TBIL: total bilirubin.
Figure 1Photomicrographs showing the effect of MCHL extract and silymarin on liver histopathology of CCl-treated rats; stains: haematoxylin & eosin; magnification, ×400. A. Vehicle-treated control liver tissue showing normal liver architecture with prominent hepatocytes and numerous sinusoids. B. CCl4-treated control group section or liver biopsy showing ballooning degeneration, massive fatty infiltration, and recruitment of inflammatory cells (predominantly neutrophils) within the portal tract and periportal zone, indicating insult. C. Section from the group treated with the MCHL extract (70.7 mg/kg dose) and CCl4 showing an area of localized and complete necrosis amidst viable hepatocytes. D. Section from the group treated with the MCHL extract (141.4 mg/kg dose) and CCl4 showing fibrin deposition and numerous mitotic bodies, indicating healing. E. Section from the group treated with the MCHL extract (282.8 mg/kg dose) and CCl4 showing moderate hepatic distension with multiple microvesicles, few lipoid cells, and inflammatory cells within the portal tract, indicating injury. F. Section from the group treated with silymarin (100 mg/kg) and CCl4 showing an area of necrosis with numerous mitotic bodies, indicating hepatocyte regeneration. MCHL: Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf; CCl4: carbon tetrachloride.
Figure 2Effects of MCHL extract on markers of oxidative stress. Levels of oxidative stress markers (GSH, CAT, SOD, and TBARS) were measured in homogenised liver samples. Histograms represent mean ± SEM values, with significant changes marked with asterisks. For significance: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. GST: glutathione; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; MCHL: Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf; CCl4: carbon tetrachloride.
Figure 3The effect of CCl4, MCHL extract, and silymarin on weight gain in rats through the course of the experiment. Data presented above demonstrates that there were no significant effects of the MCHL extract on the weights of the animals. MCHL: Musanga cecropioides hydromethanolic leaf; CCl4: carbon tetrachloride.