| Literature DB >> 31435273 |
Shahzad Javed1, Ashfaq Ahmad1, Amer Aziz2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Vascularized or non-vascularized fibula transport is a novel procedure for limb salvage but has been associated with high failure rates and complications. Ipsilateral medial fibular transport (IMFT) using Ilizarov apparatus is a modification of the procedure to prevent complications and increase success rate. This article presents the largest series of limb salvage for massive tibial bone loss in children due to pan-osteomyelitis by IMFT with Ilizarov apparatus.Entities:
Keywords: Docking; Fibular transport; Hypertrophy; Ilizarov; Osteomyelitis
Year: 2017 PMID: 31435273 PMCID: PMC6694945 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Figure 1Figure 1: 9 years old child presented with 7 months old history of road traffic accident. The patient was initially managed by bone setters. On presentation, the patient had discharging sinuses and non weight bearing. Figure 2: Immediate postoperative radiographs. Figure 3: Fibular transport assembly. Figure 4: Radiographs after 47 days. Figure 5: Radiographs after 8 months.
Figure 212 years old male presented to us after 4 weeks of road traffic accident. The patient was initially managed elsewhere with external fixation and wound wash. The Figure 6 shows immediately picture after the patient presentation. Figure 7 shows image after wound debridement. Figure 8 shows the excision of dead bone after 4 months. Figure 9 shows the fibular transport after 2 months. The Figure 10 is radiograph after 8 months and last Figure 11 shows patient picture who have smile on the face and fully satisfied with the treatment.
Demographic data and different steps of surgery.
| Patients serial number | Gender | Age | Control of infection (days) | Days to achieve fibular transport | Length of fibula transported (cm) | Hypertrophy of fibula (mm) | Time to achieve union (days) | PWB with PTB (days) | FWB With brace (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 12 | 27 | 13 | 10.0 | 3.1 | 68 | 28 | 42 |
| 2 | M | 4 | 25 | 20 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 73 | 31 | 51 |
| 3 | M | 11 | 35 | 14 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 75 | 26 | 59 |
| 4 | M | 10 | 15 | 20 | 12.0 | 3.9 | 84 | 40 | 61 |
| 5 | F | 10 | 34 | 26 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 79 | 33 | 49 |
| 6 | M | 10 | 35 | 19 | 9.0 | 3.3 | 71 | 37 | 43 |
| 7 | F | 5 | 31 | 14 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 87 | 48 | 51 |
| 8 | F | 7 | 23 | 14 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 69 | 49 | 50 |
| 9 | M | 6 | 21 | 13 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 74 | 40 | 51 |
| 10 | F | 8 | 25 | 19 | 10.0 | 3.7 | 75 | 42 | 49 |
| 11 | F | 6 | 39 | 14 | 9.0 | 3.6 | 80 | 39 | 60 |
| 12 | M | 10 | 16 | 13 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 84 | 48 | 59 |
Outcome of surgery.
| Patient serial number | Time to achieve full weight bearing without brace (days) | Range of motion of knee (degrees) | Range of motion of ankle (degrees) | Follow up complications | Limb length discrepancy before surgery (cm) | Limb length discrepancy after surgery (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 176 | 112.0 | 20.0 | Nil | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 200 | 100.0 | 28.0 | Nil | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | 209 | 95.0 | 15.0 | Nil | 0.5 | 0.25 |
| 4 | 220 | 100.0 | 29.0 | One pin infection | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 221 | 115.0 | 25.0 | One pin injection | 0.75 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 205 | 110.0 | 20.0 | Nil | 3.0 | 1.5 |
| 7 | 231 | 96.0 | 22.0 | Nil | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | 205 | 100.0 | 21.0 | Nil | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| 9 | 199 | 110.0 | 25.0 | Supracondylar fracture of femur | 0.75 | 0.25 |
| 10 | 210 | 90.0 | 18.0 | One pin site infection | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 11 | 232 | 100.0 | 15.0 | Nil | 3.0 | 1.0 |
| 12 | 220 | 110.0 | 20.0 | Nil | 1.0 | 0.0 |