Tiago Kojun Tibana1, Tony Rocha de Carvalho1, Adalberto Arão Filho2, Edson Marchiori3, Thiago Franchi Nunes1. 1. Hospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (HUMAP-UFMS), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 2. MS Diagnósticos Médicos, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 3. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Image-guided puncture techniques are being used with increasing frequency in
interventional radiology([1]-[4]). The appropriate management of a pulmonary nodule
usually requires a definitive pathological diagnosis. The accuracy of computed
tomography (CT)-guided biopsy is significantly lower for small pulmonary nodules
than for nodules > 1 cm([5]). Although minimally invasive video-assisted
thoracoscopic surgery has come to be widely used for the diagnosis of small lesions,
it is difficult for the surgeon to determine the exact location during surgery if
the nodules are small and are located more than 2 cm from the pleural
surface([6]). If they are deeper in the lung, palpation is
necessary in order to locate them for excision([7]). For all other nodules that are
potentially resectable through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, the
preoperative location should be considered([8]).There have been reports of various nodule localization techniques employing markers
such as spiral hookwires, contrast media, cyanoacrylate, and methylene
blue([9]).
Localization using hookwires has been reported in larger studies, sometimes being
performed in combination with methylene blue injection and sometimes being used in
children([10]-[12]). Most of these marker systems have been customized
for use in lung tissue or were not specifically designed for such use, having rather
been designed for the localization of breast lesions.Because of the difficulty in locating a pulmonary nodule intraoperatively and the
increasing role that CT plays in identifying such nodules in clinical lung cancer
screening, there has been extensive investigation to improve localization techniques
in order to facilitate the resection of small nodules during video-assisted
thoracoscopic surgery([8]).The marker system consists of an 18 G coaxial needle, an insertion device, and a
nitinol hookwire. The hookwire can be repositioned if necessary, and the spiral tip
provides firm anchoring in the lung tissue (Figure
1).
Figure 1
Nodule marker system composed of a coaxial needle and hookwire.
Nodule marker system composed of a coaxial needle and hookwire.
PROCEDURE
Depending on the location of the nodule (Figure
2), patients are positioned in the CT scanner in such a way as to achieve
a better assessment of the depth of the lesion, as well as to optimize the hookwire
placement and angulation-in the supine, prone, or oblique position.
Figure 2
Axial PET/CT showing a pulmonary nodule with soft-tissue density and
lobulated contours, located in the upper lobe of the left lung, with a
SUVmax of 2.19.
Axial PET/CT showing a pulmonary nodule with soft-tissue density and
lobulated contours, located in the upper lobe of the left lung, with a
SUVmax of 2.19.After local infiltration with 2% lidocaine, the coaxial needle is inserted, under CT
guidance, adjacent to or within the nodule, on the basis of an analysis made by a
multidisciplinary team (comprising an interventional radiologist, a nuclear
physician, and a thoracic surgeon). Upon withdrawal of the mandrel, the insertion
device is used in order to implant the hookwire marker. The deployment requires no
rotational movement. Before removing the coaxial needle and the insertion device,
the correct position of the marker and the angle between the introducing needle and
the pleural surface should be confirmed (Figure
3). Subsequently, a second CT scan is acquired to identify any immediate
complications, such as pneumothorax and hematoma, or any other additional finding.
Finally, the distance from the spiral tip to the intended target is evaluated.
Figure 3
Axial MIP CT reconstruction showing the hookwire positioning, adjacent to
the nodule with coarse calcifications (arrow).
Axial MIP CT reconstruction showing the hookwire positioning, adjacent to
the nodule with coarse calcifications (arrow).After implantation of the hookwire, the patient is transported directly to the
preoperative holding area. Any complaints are documented, and a brief report of the
procedure, together with copies of the relevant CT images, is sent to the operating
room. After video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and excision of the nodule (Figure 4), the surgeon fills out a form
documenting the position and accuracy of the guidewire location and a brief
assessment of the system used.
Figure 4
Macroscopic aspect of the surgical specimen (nodule) and hookwire
marker.
Macroscopic aspect of the surgical specimen (nodule) and hookwire
marker.
Authors: Chiang J Tyng; Marcus V B Baranauskas; Almir G V Bitencourt; Maria Fernanda A Almeida; João Paulo K Matsushita; Paula N V Barbosa; Marcos D Guimarães; Rubens Chojniak Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Chiang J Tyng; Luiz Henrique O Schiavon; Felipe J F Coimbra; Paula N V Barbosa; Almir G V Bitencourt; Maria Fernanda A Almeida; Ana Carolina S A Schiavon; Alessandro L Diniz; Marcos D Guimaraes; Rubens Chojniak Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Bernhard L Partik; Ann N Leung; Michael R Müller; Martin Breitenseher; Franz Eckersberger; Gerhard Dekan; Thomas H Helbich; Viktor Metz Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lalit Parida; Israel Fernandez-Pineda; John Uffman; Andrew M Davidoff; Robert Gold; Bhaskar N Rao Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Mark Kleedehn; David H Kim; Fred T Lee; Meghan G Lubner; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.959