Literature DB >> 31435079

Household Labor Supply and the Gains from Social Insurance.

Itzik Fadlon1, Torben Heien Nielsen2.   

Abstract

The marginal gains from social income insurance programs are captured by the gap in the marginal utility of consumption across states of nature. To identify this gap in the context of the household, this paper offers a new labor-supply based approach that leverages household-level economic interactions and optimality conditions. We demonstrate that, in frameworks of efficient household allocations, spousal labor supply responses to shocks have direct implications for the gains from more generous government benefits to households. We show that this holds for both intensive and extensive margin responses under fairly general conditions. Our analysis illustrates how labor market data can be used for assessing marginal welfare gains in a general class of social insurance schemes, including the large and important programs of disability insurance and survivors benefits. Hence, household labor supply behavior and responses to shocks, which are widely studied in theoretical and empirical work, hold valuable information for the optimal design of social insurance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation of Welfare Gains; Household Labor Supply; Social Insurance

Year:  2018        PMID: 31435079      PMCID: PMC6703837          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Econ        ISSN: 0047-2727


  4 in total

1.  Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records.

Authors:  Raj Chetty; John N Friedman; Tore Olsen; Luigi Pistaferri
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  Disability Insurance and the Dynamics of the Incentive Insurance Trade-Off.

Authors:  Hamish Low; Luigi Pistaferri
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Earnings, Disposable Income, and Consumption of Allowed and Rejected Disability Insurance Applicants.

Authors:  Andreas Ravndal Kostol; Magne Mogstad
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2015-05

4.  Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F A Sloan; W K Viscusi; H W Chesson; C J Conover; K Whetten-Goldstein
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.