Literature DB >> 31434618

Plasticity induction in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and SMA-proper differentially affects visuomotor sequence learning.

Takahiro Shimizu1, Ritsuko Hanajima2, Yuichiro Shirota3, Ryosuke Tsutsumi3, Nobuyuki Tanaka3, Yasuo Terao4, Masashi Hamada3, Yoshikazu Ugawa5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and SMA-proper (SMA) must play important roles in visuomotor sequence learning. However, functional differences between the pre-SMA and SMA have not been well studied in humans.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the functional differences between the pre-SMA and SMA in sequence learning in humans.
METHODS: To induce LTP/LTD, we administered quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) with an inter-stimulus interval of 5 or 50 ms (QPS-5/50) over the pre-SMA or SMA in healthy volunteers. The sham stimulation was also done as a control. We studied the effects of LTP/LTD in the pre-SMA/SMA on a new sequence learning and the performance of well-learned sequence by using sequence learning task called the "2 × 10 task". Effects on the simple choice reaction time task were also studied for comparison.
RESULTS: QPS-5 over the pre-SMA increased the error rate without any changes in movement speed. When administered over the SMA, QPS-5 decreased, and QPS-50 increased the rate of reaction time reduction across trials without changes in the error rate. QPS over neither the pre-SMA nor SMA affected the performances of a well-learned sequence or a simple choice reaction time task.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings that QPS over the pre-SMA correlated with sequence learning performance and that over the SMA with execution speed are consistent with the previous results in animals and humans. Our results lend further support to the utility of QPS for modulating motor learning in humans.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Plasticity; Presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA); Sequence learning; Supplementary motor area (SMA); Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31434618     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  4 in total

Review 1.  Quadripulse stimulation (QPS).

Authors:  Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Corticocortical paired associative stimulation for treating motor dysfunction after stroke: study protocol for a randomised sham-controlled double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Duan; Xu-Yun Hua; Mou-Xiong Zheng; Jia-Jia Wu; Xiang-Xin Xing; Yu-Lin Li; Jian-Guang Xu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback.

Authors:  Aino E Tervo; Jaakko O Nieminen; Pantelis Lioumis; Johanna Metsomaa; Victor H Souza; Heikki Sinisalo; Matti Stenroos; Jukka Sarvas; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 8.955

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.